THE INFLUENCE OF MOTIVATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES

  • University DarulUlulm
Abstract views: 9746 , PDF downloads: 6055
Keywords: Keywords, keja motivation, work environment, employee performance

Abstract

Abstract.ThisĀ  aims to determine the factors that affect the performance of employees of the University PGRI RonggolaweTuban. These factors are motivation and work environment. Employees who have a high motivation to work will have a positive impact for the organization, so as to achieve organizational goals. Hypothesis testing is done by spreading the questionnaire as many as 52 employees of the University PGRI RonggolaweTuban. Analysis using multiple linear regression analysis. Results of testing the hypothesis that the value F = 4,312; and p = 0.019 (p <0.05) that there is influence motivation and work environment on employee performance PGRI University RonggolaweTuban. The results of the partial test (t test) on the motivation variable, obtained t = 0.136, p = 0.892 (p> 0.05), meaning that work motivation has no significant effect on employee performance. On the environment variable obtained value t = 2,376; and p = 0.021 (p <0.05), which means that the working environment have a significant effect on employee performance. R2 = 0.115 shows that simultaneously motivated and able to contribute to the environmental performance of 11.5% on the employees of the University of PGRI RonggolaweTuban..

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006 ProsedurPenelitian:suatuPendekatanPraktik. CetakanKetigabelas. Jakarta: PT. RinekaCipta.
Bakotic, DanicadanTomislavBabic. 2013. Relationship Between Working Conditions and Job Satisfaction: The Case Of Croatian Shipbuilding Company. International Journal of Buisiness and Social Science. 4 (2): pp:206-213.
Bernardi G. 2001. Dispersal of the coral reef three-spot dascyllus, Dascyllustrimaculatus, at three spatial scales. Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
Edwin B. Flippo. 1998. ManajemenPersonalia. Jilid 2. Jakarta :Erlangga
Ghozali, Imam. 2009. AplikasiAnalisis Multivariate denganProgramSPSS. Semarang: B-PUNDIP.
Gomes, F. Cardosa. 2003. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset.
Hamzah, B. Uno.2008. TeoriMotivasidanPengukurannyaAnalisis di BidangPendidikan Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Handayani, Nurlaila. (2010). Pengembangan Model IntqualUntukMeningkatkanKualitasLayanan Internal Di PendidikanTinggi.InstitutTeknologiSepuluh November, Surabaya.
Handoko, T. Hani. 2001.Manajemen PersonaliadanSumberDayaManusia. Yogyakarta : BPFE Press.
Hasibuan, M. 2002.ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.
Hasibuan, M., 2003.OrganisasidanMotivasi.DasarPeningkatanProduktivitas. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Mangkunegara, Anwar P., 2001, ManajemenSumberDayaManusia Perusahaan. Bandung :RemajaRosdaKarya.
Mangkunegara, Anwar P.,2003. PerencanaandanPengembanganSumberDayaManusia. Bandung: PT. RefikaAditama.
Mangkunegara, Anwar P.,2009. EvaluasiKinerjaSumberDayaManusia. Bandung: PenerbitRefikaAditama.
Mangkunegara, Anwar P.,2010. PerilakudanBudayaOrganisasi.Bandung:RefikaAditama.
Mangkunegara, Anwar P.,2011. ManajemenSumberDayaManusiaPerusahaan. Bandung: RefikaAditama.
Mathis, Robert L. dan Jackson. John H. 2006. Human Resource Management (ManajemenSumberDayaManusia).Edisi 10. Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 1999. KebijakanKinerjaKaryawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Richard L. 2003. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Jakarta: PenerbitErlangga.
Robbins, Stephen, P. 2003. Prinsip-PrinsipPerilakuOrganisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rumada, Gede. I WayanMudiarthaUtama. 2013. PengaruhKompensasi, Kepemimpinan, danLingkunganKerjaFisikTerhadapKepuasanKerjaKaryawan Hotel Taman HarumUbudGianyar. 2 (1): pp: 106-120.
Sari, Emilia NovianiAsta. 2009. PengaruhLingkunganKerjaTerhadapKinerjaKaryawanBagianProduksi PT. Glory Industrial Semarang II. Semarang. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sedarmayanti, 2007. (ManajemenSumberDayaManusia) ReformasiBirokrasidanManajemenPegawaiNegeriSipil. Bandung: PT. RefikaAditama
Sedarmayanti, 2011. Tata KerjadanProduktivitasKerja :SuatuTinjauanDariAspekErgonomiAtauKaitanAntaraManusiaDenganLingkunganKerjanya. CetakanKetiga. Bandung: MandarMaju.
Sedarmayanti. 2001. Tata KerjadanProduktivitasKerja.CetakanKetujuh Bandung: MandarMaju.
Siagian, Sondang P,2004. TeoriMotivasidanAplikasinya.CetakanKetiga. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Siagian, Sondang P. 2003. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Simamora, Henry. 1997. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.
Sinambela, LijanPoltak. (2012). KinerjaPegawai: Teori, Pengukuran, danImplikasi, Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.
SofyandidanGarniwa. 2007. PerilakuOrganisasional. EdisiPertama. GrahaIlmu. Yogyakarta.
Sudarmanto. 2009. Kinerja DanPengembanganKompetensi SDM. CetakanPertama. PustakaPelajar. Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. 2008. MetodePenelitianKuantitatifKualitatifdan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Umar, Husein. 2005. MetodePenelitianuntukSkripsidanTesisBisnis. EdisiBaru. PT. Raja GrafindoPersada. Jakarta.
Wursanto, Ig. 2005.Dasar-Dasar Ilmuorganisasi. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset.
Yahyo. 2013. Pengaruh Motivasi, Lingkungan Kerja, dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Semangat Kerja Karyawan CV. Putra Jaya Sahita guna, Semarang. Diponegoro Journal of Social and Politic. Universitas Diponegoro.
Published
2017-07-21
Section
Articles