INFORM: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Prodi teknik informatika Universitas Dr. Soetomo

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Scientific research related to information and communication technology fields, including but not limited to informatics engineering, information systems, computer systems, and computer science.

Hasil penelitian ilmiah dibidang yang terkait dengan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada bidang teknik informatika, sistem informasi, sistem komputer, dan ilmu komputer.

 

Section Policies

Volume 1 No. 1 2016

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 3 No. 1 2018

nothing

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Volume 3 No. 2 2018

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for INFORM focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using iThenticate.

The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.

The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published two times a year (January, July)

 

Open Access Policy

This journal is an open access journal which provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles without charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers have right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in Inform Jurnal ilmiah bidang teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic and Malpractice Statement


Etika Penulis

Pelaporan; penulis harus memberikan informasi tentang proses dan hasil penelitiannya kepada redaksi secara jujur, jelas, dan menyeluruh, serta tetap menyimpan data penelitiannya dengan baik dan aman.
Orisinalitas dan plagiarisme; penulis harus memastikan bahwa naskah yang telah dikirim/diserahkan ke redaksi adalah naskah asli, ditulis oleh dirinya sendiri, bersumber dari ide dan gagasan sendiri, dan bukan menjiplak karya tulis atau ide/gagasan orang lain. Penulis dilarang keras untuk mengalih-nama-kan sumber referensi yang dikutip ke nama orang lain.
Pengulangan pengiriman; penulis harus menginformasikan bahwa naskah yang dikirim/diserahkan ke redaksi adalah naskah yang belum pernah dikirimkan/diserahkan ke penerbit jurnal/publikasi lain. Apabila ditemukan adanya “redudansi” pengiriman naskah ke penerbit lain, maka redaksi akan menolak naskah yang dikirimkan penulis.
Status penulis; penulis harus menginformasikan ke redaksi bahwa penulis memiliki kompetensi atau kualifikasi dalam bidang kepakaran tertentu yang sesuai dengan bidang ilmu terbitan, yaitu kepustakawanan. Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah ke redaksi adalah penulis pertama (co-author) sehingga jika ditemukan masalah dalam proses penerbitan naskah dapat segera dituntaskan.
Kesalahan penulisan naskah; penulis harus segera menginformasikan ke redaksi apabila ditemukan kesalahan dalam penulisan naskah, baik hasil review maupun hasil edit. Kesalahan penulisan tersebut mencakup penulisan nama, afiliasi/instansi, kutipan, serta tulisan lain yang dapat mengurangi makna dan susbtansi naskah. Jika hal itu terjadi, penulis harus segera mengusulkan perbaikan naskah.
Pengungkapan konflik kepentingan; penulis harus memahami etika publikasi ilmiah di atas untuk menghindari adanya konflik kepentingan dengan pihak lain, sehingga naskah dapat diproses secara lancar dan aman.

Etika Editor

Keputusan publikasi; editor harus memastikan proses penelaahan naskah secara menyeluruh, transparan, objektif, adil, dan bijaksana. Hal tersebut menjadi dasar editor dalam mengambil keputusan terhadap suatu naskah, ditolak atau diterima. Dalam hal ini, dewan editor berperan sebagai tim seleksi naskah.

Informasi publikasi; editor harus memastikan bahwa panduan penulisan naskah bagi penulis dan pihak lain yang berkepentingan dapat diakses dan dibaca secara jelas, baik versi cetak maupun elektronik.
Pembagian naskah peer-review; editor harus memastikan reviewer dan bahan naskah untuk review, serta menginformasikan ketentuan dan proses review naskah secara jelas ke reviewer.
Objektivitas dan netralitas; editor harus objektif, netral, dan jujur dalam mengedit naskah, tanpa membedakan jenis kelamin, sisi bisnis, suku, agama, ras, antar-golongan, dan kewarganegaraan penulis.
Kerahasiaan; editor harus menjaga setiap informasi dengan baik, khususnya yang terkait dengan privasi penulis dan distribusi naskahnya.
Pengungkapan konflik kepentingan; editor harus memahami etika publikasi ilmiah di atas untuk menghindari adanya konflik kepentingan dengan pihak lain, sehingga proses penerbitan naskah berjalan lancar dan aman.

Etika Reviewer

Objektivitas dan netralitas; reviewer harus jujur, objektif, tidak bias, independen, dan hanya berpihak pada kebenaran ilmiah. Proses penelaahan naskah dilakukan secara profesional tanpa membedakan jenis kelamin, sisi bisnis, suku, agama, ras, antar-golongan, dan kewarganegaraan penulis.
Kejelasan sumber referensi; reviewer harus memastikan bahwa sumber referensi/kutipan naskah telah sesuai dan kredibel (dapat dipertanggungjawabkan). Jika ditemukan kesalahan atau penyimpangan dalam penulisan sumber referensi/kutipan, reviewer harus segera menginformasikan ke redaksi untuk dilakukan perbaikan oleh penulis sesuai catatan dari reviewer.
Efektivitas peer-review; reviewer harus merespon naskah yang telah dikirim oleh redaksi dan bekerja sesuai dengan waktu penelaahan naskah (peer-review) yang telah ditetapkan (maksimal 2 minggu). Apabila membutuhkan waktu tambahan dalam review naskah harus segera melaporkan (konfirmasi) ke sekretariat redaksi.
Pengungkapan konflik kepentingan; reviewer harus memahami etika publikasi ilmiah di atas untuk menghindari adanya konflik kepentingan dengan pihak lain, sehingga proses penerbitan naskah berjalan lancar dan aman.


Etika Pengelola Jurnal

Pengambilan keputusan; pengelola jurnal/dewan redaksi harus menjabarkan misi dan tujuan organisasi, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan penetapan kebijakan dan keputusan penerbitan jurnal tanpa adanya kepentingan tertentu.
Kebebasan; pengelola jurnal harus memberikan kebebasan kepara reviewer dan editor untuk menciptakan suasana kerja yang nyaman serta menghargai privasi penulis.
Jaminan dan promosi; pengelola jurnal harus menjamin dan melindungi hak kekayaan intelektual (hak cipta), serta transparan dalam mengelola dana yang diterima oleh pihak ketiga. Selain itu, pengelola jurnal harus mempublikasikan dan mempromosikan hasil terbitan ke masyarakat dengan memberikan jaminan kemanfaatan dalam penggunaan naskah.
Pengungkapan konflik kepentingan; pengelola jurnal harus memahami etika publikasi ilmiah di atas untuk menghindari adanya konflik kepentingan dengan pihak lain, sehingga proses penerbitan naskah berjalan lancar dan aman.

===============================

Author Ethics

Reporting; the author must provide information about the process and the results of research to the editor in an honest, clear, and comprehensive, and keep the data research properly and safely.
Originality and plagiarism; The author must make sure that the manuscript that has been sent to the editor is the original, written by himself, sourced from ideas and ideas, and not plagiarize the works or ideas of others. Authors are strictly prohibited from transferring the Sources available to anyone else's name.
Repetition of delivery; the author should mention the script sent / sent to the editor is a script that has never been delivered. If there is any redundancy submitting the manuscript to another publication, then the editor will reject the submitted manuscript.
Author status; the author must submit to the editor that the author has the requirements in the field of expertise in accordance with the field of publications, namely librarianship. The author who subscribes the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) if found problems in the process can be completed immediately.
Error of vegetable manuscript; the author should immediately find errors found in the discussion of the manuscript, both the results of reviews and edits. Errors used to refer names, affiliations, information, and other posts that may reduce the meaning and susceptibility of the manuscript. If that happens, the author should immediately announce the repair of the manuscript.
Disclosure of conflict of interest; writers must understand what is happening to others, allowing to translate and help.

Editor Ethics 

Publication Decision; editors should make the review process thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and wise. It becomes the basis of the editor in making decisions of folders, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as a complete team of manuscripts.

Publication information; editors should ensure that you can use and use clear, both printed and electronic information.
The distribution of peer-reviewed manuscripts; editors to review reviews and materials for reviews, and evaluation and review process.
Objectivity and neutrality; editors must be objective, neutral, and honest in understanding the manuscript, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and author's citizenship.
Confidentiality; editors should keep all information well, especially with the author's privacy and distribution of the manuscript.
Disclosure of conflict of interest; editors must understand the ethics of publications to avoid conflicts with others, making the process toward the script work smoothly and safely.

Ethics Review

Objectivity and neutrality; the reviewer must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The process of manipulation is done professionally regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and author's citizenship.
Source clarity; the reviewer should ensure that the reference / quotation is appropriate and credible (accountable). If errors or irregularities are found in the use of reference / quotation sources, the reviewer should be promptly submitted to the editor for improvement by the author according to the reviewer's record.
Peer-reviewed effectiveness; reviewers have responded the manuscript submitted by the editors and cooperated with the specified peer-review period (maximum 2 weeks). The time required in the review should immediately report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.
Disclosure of conflict of interest; observers must understand the ethics of publications to avoid conflicts with others, making the process toward the manuscript run smoothly and safely.

Journal Manager Ethics

Decision-making; the manager of the journal / editorial board should describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially those relating to the determination of policy and decision of journal publishing without any particular interest.
Freedom; journal managers should give the reviewers and editors the freedom to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the privacy of the author.
Warranty and promotion; journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal organizers should publish and promote the results of publications to the public by providing assurance of usefulness in the use of the manuscript.
Disclosure of conflict of interest; journal managers must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with other parties, so the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.