Ruang publik dan media sosial: partisipasi politik mahasiswa indonesia
Abstract views: 1034
,
PDF downloads: 2262
Untitled downloads: 0
Abstract
The public sphere has not been effective and is considered lacking a significant benefit to the development of democracy in Indonesia. The assumption of Habermas (1987) in the theory of communicative action is to consider public sphere that have political influence. Social media as a public sphere through communicative action theory Habermas believes that students are free to communicate with each other. Therefore, there is a need for studies to study which social media is needed to increase student political participation. By using a mixed method, namely discussing quantitative and qualitative to find out the use of social media as a public space through more contemporary political communication. The results show that social media has proven to be effective as a public sphere for students and has become the most important part for the interaction, discussion and political aspirations of students in a country that supports democracy. This can be clearly seen that social media has contributed massively and significantly to the development of universal public sphere, accessible to students without sphere and time limits. The reason is that students can hardly access information and challenge their political aspirations. The more open public sphere for students through social media can increase student political participation through dialogic dialogue and this is a good step for the realization of deliberative democracy in Indonesia.
Keywords: Social Media; Public Sphere; Communicative Action
References
Bhakti, S. E. (2015). The Uses and Effects of Online Social Media among Acehnese Students.
Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
Chaffey, D. (2019). Global Social Media Research Summary 2019.
Chaffey, D. (2020). Global social media research summary 2020.
Creswell, J. (2007). Creswell , J . W . ( 2007 ). Qualitative inquiry and research design : Choosing among five approaches ( 2 " ’ ’ Edition ). Thousand Oaks : Sage . Qualitative Inquiry.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.
Habermas, J. (2010). Ruang Publik: Sebuah Kajian Tentang Kategori Masyarakat Borjuis terj. Yudi Santoso. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hidayah, Y., Sapriya, S., Darmawan, C., & Malihah, E. (2020). Protes Sosial Dalam Komunikasi Politik di Era Digital Melalui Civic Community Pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 4(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i1.1964
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
Musa, H. G., Mulyana, D., Bajari, A., & Navarro, C. J. S. (2020). Promoting Indonesian tourism through Sudanese tourists communication experiences in Bandung. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i1.2150
Putranto, T. D. (2019). Wacana Berita PT. Djarum dan Bulu Tangkis Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v3i1.1052
Saidah, M., & Rusfian, E. Z. (2020). Hoax management of presidential staff office: An example of government public relations strategies. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 4(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i1.1769
Salman. (2017). Media Sosial Sebagai Ruang Publik. Kalbisocio, Volume 4 N(Agustus 2017).
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation/James P. Spradley. Published: New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Subijanto, R. (2014). Ruang Publik Dulu dan Sekarang.
Susilo, D. (2020). Penitipan Handphone Sebagai Komunikasi Non Verbal Santri PPP Walisongo Desa Cukir Jombang. Communication, 11(1), 94–111.
Susilo, D., Christantyawati, N., Joko Prasetyo, I., & Rodrick Juraman, S. (2019). Content analysis of LINE application user: Intersecting technology and social needed. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012224
Susilo, D., Prabowo, T. L., & Putranto, T. D. (2019). Communicating secure based feeling: Content analysis on indonesian police official account. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F8377.088619
Susilo, D., Putranto, T. D., Neu, M. T. L. M., & Navarro, C. J. S. (2020). NAGEKEO WOMEN’S CULTURAL STRUGGLE AS A FLORES SUB-CULTURE AGAINST THE FLOW OF CIVILIZATION’S PROGRESS. Bricolage : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(01), 001. https://doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v6i01.2064
Taiminen, H. M., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2013-0073
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Kajian Media
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
