Authority in Resolving Disputes Over the Results of Simultaneous Village Head Elections in Central Lombok Regency Based on Applicable Laws and Regulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v4i1.10763Keywords:
Authority, Dispute Resolution, Simultaneous Village Head ElectionsAbstract
This study was conducted to determine the Authority for Settlement of Disputes over the Results of Simultaneous Village Head Elections in Central Lombok Regency Based on Applicable Laws and Regulations so that it discusses how to resolve disputes over the results of simultaneous Village Head Elections in Central Lombok Regency and how the legal rules for resolving disputes over the results of village head elections are by applicable laws and regulations. This study uses an empirical legal research method with an empirical juridical approach so that it is carried out by observing the events that occur in resolving disputes over the results of simultaneous village head elections in Central Lombok Regency which focuses on the period of 2022 and 2025 and examines the applicable laws and regulations to resolve disputes over the results of simultaneous village head elections. Conclusions are drawn by referring to the theory of Justice, Legal Certainty, Benefit, and Dispute Resolution. The implementation of the settlement of disputes over the results of simultaneous Village Head Elections in Central Lombok Regency has not been able to produce legal certainty for the parties who filed the dispute. Based on the theory of legal certainty, according to Jan Michiel Otto, one of the elements that causes the Determination of the Simultaneous Village Head Election Results Dispute Resolution Team to not be able to provide legal certainty is the lack of clear rules as a guideline for resolving Village Head Election Results Disputes. The legal rules for resolving disputes over the results of the simultaneous village head elections are quite comprehensive. However, in its implementation, there is regulatory space for regional governments (Regents/Mayors), which cannot yet be regulated clearly and effectively in order to provide legal certainty for the parties.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Acara Pengajuan Undang-Undang. Sekertariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkama konstitusi RI.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Konstitusi Press.
Attamimi, A. H. S. (1993). Peranan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara: Suatu Studi Analisis mengenai Keputusan Presiden yang Berfungsi Pengaturan dalam Kurun Waktu Pelita I – Pelita IV. Disertasi.
Damayanti, S. S., & Marwiyah, S. (2025). Mediation in Pancasila Philosophy: A Value Analysis of the Fourth Precept of Consultative Consensus. Iuris Philosophia Journal, 1(1), 81–90. https://jurnal.jurisprudenceinsights.com/index.php/Iurisphilosophiajournal/article/view/10
Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2022). The Authority of the Village Government in the Management of Village Funds during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 4(1), 195–222.
Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Peryitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.
Hoessein, B. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Desa dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat. Rajawali Pers.
MD, M. M. (1993). Demokrasi dan Konstitusi di Indonesia. Liberty.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Penerbit Liberty.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (1981). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Angkasa.
Sirajuddin, Sukriono, D., & Winardi. (2011). Hukum Pelayanan Publik. Setara Press.
Waluyo, B. (2002). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika.
