Legal Protection of Justice Collaborators in Planned Criminal Actions
(Study of the Case on the Decision of the Defendant Richard Eliezer at the South Jakarta District Court)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v8i2.11202Keywords:
Ferdy Sambo, Richard Eliezer, Premeditated Murder, Justice CollaboratorAbstract
The main objective of this study is to determine the legal force that binds the testimony of Justice Collaborators in making decisions by judges and forms of legal protection as Justice Collaborators in the case study of Richard Eliezer at the South Jakarta District Court. This research uses a case approach that involves observation or research on legal phenomena, court decisions, then uses judgments linked to applicable laws such as Law Number 31 of 2014 Concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, which has been ratified into Law Number 31 of 2014. 7 of 2006 concerning Ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, the 2003 United Nations Convention Against Corruption, and SEMA Number 04 of 2011 concerning the Treatment of Whistleblowers and Witnesses of Collaborating Actors (Justice Collaborators) in Criminal Cases Certain. The results of this study where Ferdy Sambo as the main accused in the premeditated murder case against Nofriansyah Yoshua Hutabarat, and three other people were also named as suspects namely Richard Eliezer, Ricky Rizal, and Strong Ma'ruf by being charged with violating Article 340 subsidiary article 338 Jucto article 55 Paragraph 1 Criminal Code. Richard Eliezer was legally and convincingly guilty of participating in the murder, but because of his courage in submitting himself to become a Justice Collaborator, the Panel of Judges only sentenced the defendant Richard Eliezer to imprisonment for 1 year and 6 months. The defendant Richard Eliezer has the right to obtain this right because of his courage in revealing the case of premeditated murder committed by Ferdy Sambo in accordance with Law Number 31 of 2014 Article 5 Paragraph 1 and Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 04 of 2011 Concerning Treatment for Whistleblowers and witness of the Cooperating Actor (Justice Collaborator).
References
Arifin, S., & Yulianto, A. (2023). Quo Vadis Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Formil. Jurnal Spektrum Hukum, 20(1), 48–57.
Azzahra, A. N. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut UU Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Jurnal Verstek, 10(1), 1–9.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, 5 1 (1981).
Chandra, T. Y., & Putra, Y. (2022). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Sangir Multi Usaha.
Larantukan. (2017). Analisis Bahan Hukum. Repository Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 59–65.
Lestari, N. N. R. D., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. (2023). Justice Collaborator dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), 8–13.
Machmud, B., Junaidi, M., Sihotang, A. P., & Collaborator, J. (2021). Reposisi Kedudukan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(1), 362–377.
Mentari, B. M. R. (2020). Saksi Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Hukum Islam. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i1.33
Tim Detik Sumut. (2023). Perlindungan ke Eliezer di Cabut LPSK, Ini Alasannya. Detik Sumut. https://www.detik.com/sumut/berita/d-6612375/perlindungan-ke-eliezer-di-cabut-lpsk-ini-alasannya
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, (2014).
Yacob, M. F., & Mohamad, K. N. (2023). Hadiah untuk Justice Collaborator Hakim Gunakan Akal Sehat. Harian Disway, 1–3.
