Digital Vigilantism and the Crisis of Formal Legal Legitimacy: A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Influence of Social Media on Law Enforcement in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.11861Keywords:
Digital Vigilantism, Legal Legitimacy, Social Media, Rule of Law, Due Process of LawAbstract
The rise of social media has given rise to the phenomenon of digital vigilantism—a form of social punishment through naming, shaming, and online campaigns that occurs before formal judicial proceedings are concluded. This phenomenon not only reflects an expression of collective anger but also indicates a transformation in the relationship between society and the formal legal system. This study aims to analyze digital vigilantism as a response to the crisis of legal legitimacy and its implications for the independence of law enforcement and the rule of law through a normative legal method using a qualitative approach based on literature review and case analysis in Indonesia. Research findings indicate that digital vigilantism is a form of public participation influenced by shifts in social structure and legal awareness, with social media serving as a new arena for the establishment of legal legitimacy that can expedite official responses, enhance transparency, and create opportunities for victim advocacy; however, it also gives rise to ambivalence due to its potential to foster selective justice based on virality, legal populism, and the erosion of the presumption of innocence through trial by social media. Philosophically, this phenomenon risks fueling moral panic, the tyranny of the majority, cancel culture, and digital authoritarianism—trends that shift the legitimacy of the law from procedural rationality toward collective emotion. Therefore, a balance is needed between digital public participation and the protection of due process of law through enhanced government responsiveness and transparency, as well as the strengthening of the public’s legal literacy and digital ethics, to support substantive justice within Indonesia’s legal system.
References
BOOK
Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, 1951).
Banet-Weiser, R, Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny (Durham: Duke University Press, 2018).
Citron, D, Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014).
Cohen, Stanley, Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers, 3d ed (London: Routledge, 2002).
Ehrlich, Eugen, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936).
Ewick, Patricia & Susan S Silbey, The Common Place of Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Friedman, Lawrence M The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975).
Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels, Manifesto Partai Komunis, Ted Sprague, ed (Marxists Internet Archive, 2023).
McLoughlin, M, Social Movements and Legal Change (London: Routledge, 2018).
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Hukum dan Masyarakat (Bandung: Angkasa, 1981).
———, Hukum dan Masyarakat (Bandung: Angkasa, 1986).
Sobieraj, Sarah, Credible Threat: Attacks Against Women Online and the Future of Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).
Tyler, T. R., Why People Obey the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).
Wardani, Azzara Mustika & Rina Sari Kusuma, Budaya Partisipatoris Online Pada Fenomena Cybervigilantism Fans K-Pop (Studi Kasus Pada Akun @Protect_Riize) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2023) [unpublished].
Zuboff, Shoshana, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (New York: Public Affairs, 2019).
JOURNAL
Bourdieu, Pierre, “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field” (1987) 38 Hastings Law J.
Favarel-Garrigues, Gilles, Samuel Tanner & Daniel Trottier, “Introducing Digital Vigilantism” (2016) 17:3–4 Glob Crime.
Hamdani, Fathul et al, “Media Vs. Law: Which Acts as a Tool of Social Engineering?” (2023) 2:2 Indones Media Law Rev.
Iskandar, Dedi et al, “Perkembangan Teori dan Penerapan Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia” (2024) 1:3 JIMMI J Ilm Mhs Multidisiplin 293–305, online: <https://jurnal.fanshurinstitute.org/index.php/jimmi/article/view/147>.
Isnaini, Muhamad et al., “Praktik vigilantisme digital di media sosial dalam konflik antarkelompok” 4:3 J Stud Komun (Indonesian J Commun Stud.
Lazzini, Arianna et al, “Emotions, Moods and Hyperreality: Social Media and the Stock Market during the First Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic” (2022) 35:1 Accounting, Audit Account J, online: <https://www.emerald.com/aaaj/article/35/1/199/2217/Emotions-moods-and-hyperreality-social-media-and>.
Lengkong, Mario Randy et al, “Media Sosial dan Pembentukan Opini Publik: Implikasi Hukum terhadap Proses Peradilan yang Adil” (2025) 6:1 J Paradig J Sociol Res Educ 179–191, online: <https://ejurnal.unima.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/view/11857>.
Lim, H, “Viral Justice and Social Media” (2021) Asian J Law Soc.
Loveluck, B, “The Many Shades of Digital Vigilantism: A Typology of Online Self-Justice” (2019) Glob Crime.
Matogu, Faisal & Elis Rusmiati, “Prinsip Due Process of Law dalam Ketentuan Pasal 29 UU No. 46 Tahun 2009” (2023) 16:2 Mercat J.
Mayal, Tanya, “Presumption of Innocence and Dilution of Facts by Media Trials” (2021) 3:3 Int J Leg Sci Innov.
Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose & Jessalynn Keller, “#MeToo and the Promise of Digital Feminism” (2019). Fem Media Stud, online: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350506818765318>.
Muhammad, Rustamaji et al, “The Reduction of Criminal Justice Policy in Indonesia: Justice versus Virality” (2025) 5:2 J Hum Rights, Cult Leg Syst, online: <https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/637>.
Ningrum, A. J. & Aminulloh, “Vigilantisme Digital dalam Aksi Boikot Produk Israel di Media Sosial” (2024) 6:1 J Komun Nusant.
Nugroho, S E, “Digital Activism and Public Pressure in Indonesia” (2020) J Legal Stud.
Pradhana, Ghozian Aulia & Syaifa Tania, “Hyperreality of #BlackLivesMatter Movement on Social Media” (2021) 37:3 J Komun Malaysian J Commun.
Pramesthi, Jasmine Alya, “Parasocial Relationships and the Formation of Hyperreality in the BTS World Game” (2021) 14:1 Mediat J Komun, online: <https://library.kab.ac.ug/Record/doaj-art-792676cfc3ba46a2b29600510f8318b4?sid=1494504>.
Purwadi, Didik, Amiruddin & Rina Khairani Pancaningrum, “Konsep Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri dalam Hukum Pidana” (2022) 10:3 Kertha Semaya J Ilmu Huk.
Rahman, Taufik, “Trial by Netizen: Dinamika Penghakiman Publik di Era Digital” (2020) 5:2 J Sosiol Huk.
Rinaldi, Kasmanto, “Strategi Pencegahan Eigenrechting di Lingkungan Masyarakat” (2022) 24:1 J Kaji Ilmu Sos dan Budaya.
Tanzilulloh, M Ilham, “Virality, Justice and the Principle of Blocking the Means to Evil” (2024) 16:2 Jure J Huk dan Syar’iah.
Valenzuela, S, T Correa & H Gil de Zúñiga, “Social media campaigns and public attention to legal cases: A longitudinal analysis” (2021) 26:3 J Comput Commun 135–155.
WEBSITE
Tempo, “Presiden Didesak Berikan Amnesti untuk Baiq Nuril”, (2019), online: <https://www.tempo.co/politik/presiden-didesak-berikan-amnesti-untuk-baiq-nuril-877523>.
Tirto, “Rangkuman Kasus Mario Dandy, Kronologi David hingga Ayah Dipecat”, (2023), online: <https://tirto.id/rangkuman-kasus-mario-dandy-kronologi-david-hingga-ayah-dipecat-gCQd>.
Tv One, “Kasus KDRT yang Viral di Media Sosial Sudah Masuk Tahap Penyidikan”, (2022), online: <https://www.tvonenews.com/channel/news/96613-kasus-kdrt-yang-viral-di-media-sosial-sudah-masuk-tahap-penyidikan>.