Legal Protection for Customers in Electronic Goods Pawn-Deposit Agreements at PT Sarara Gadai Indonesia in Palu City

Authors

  • Rizky Sabrina
  • Rosnani Lakunna
  • Moh. Saleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.12053

Keywords:

Electronic Goods, Agreements, PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia, Pawnbroking Services

Abstract

Pawnshops play a strategic role in meeting the need for quick financing, especially for the general public and MSMEs that have limited access to formal banking services. Pawnshops in Indonesia that play a particularly strategic role are private pawnshops, which are regulated by OJK Regulation No. 31/POJK.05/2016 on the pawnshop business. One of the private pawnshops currently operating in Palu is PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia; however, the pawn practices currently carried out by Sarara Gadai do not align with applicable laws, and the standard clauses in the agreements drafted by PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia appears to be biased against the interests of consumers (customers). This study aims to examine how the pawn agreement for electronic goods is implemented at PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia in Palu City, and to assess the compliance of the standard clauses in the pawn agreement for electronic goods at PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia in Palu City, with the provisions of the Civil Code and OJK Regulation No. 31/POJK.05/2016. The research design employed is empirical legal research. The study was conducted at the PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia branch is located at I Gusti Ngurah Rai. The results indicate that the implementation of electronic goods pawn agreements at PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia constitutes a supplementary agreement to a debt-credit agreement, serving as collateral for debt repayment. In practice, the implementation of the agreement is supported by straightforward requirements, flexible payment terms, and a fast disbursement process. In terms of compliance, the clauses of the pawn agreement meet some of the legal requirements for pawn agreements, including the conditions for a valid agreement; however, they are not fully compliant because there are still several clauses that deviate from the legal provisions outlined in the Civil Code and the OJK Regulation.

References

AGREEMENT FORM

Pawn Agreement Letter from PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia, 2026.

BOOK

Irwansyah, Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Ahsan Yunus, ed. (Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2024).

Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).

Purwaningsih, Sri Budi, Hukum Jaminan dan Agunan Kredit dalam Praktik Perbankan di Indonesia (Sidoarjo: Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, 2019).

JOURNAL

Aprilia, Rohmawati Putri & Mas Anienda Tien Fitria, “Kedudukan Hukum Surat Bukti Gadai dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Kepada Pemberi Gadai” (2022) 6:2 J Pendidik Tambusai 10596–10604.

Aribawa, Muhammad Yustino et al, “Unraveling the Ratio Legis of the HKPD Law on Local Taxes and its Implications for the Community” (2025) 1:1 Soetomo Justice 32–41.

Dewi, Marini Citra, Sitti Fatimah Maddisila & Ratu Ratna Korompot, “Peran Merek dan Indikasi Geografis dalam Mendukung Industri Produk Kopi untuk Mendukung Ekonomi Daerah yang Berkelanjutan” (2024) 12:2 Suloh J Fak Huk Univ Malikussaleh 481–495, online: <https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/suloh/article/view/18119>.

Fauzia, Ana, Deva Gama Rizky Octavia, & Fathul Hamdani, “The Conflict of the Norms in the Execution of Secured Objects Which are Enforced by Liability Rights When the Debtor is Bankrupt” (2022) 4:1 Progress Law Rev 1–9.

Hayati, Winta, “Analisis Yuridis Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Nasabah terhadap Barang Jaminan dalam Perjanjian Gadai” (2024) 6:3 J Ilm Metadata 122–136.

Ikbal, Mohammad, “Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Elektronik (E-commerce) Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015” (2015) 7:14 Al-Adl J Huk, online: <https://www.neliti.com/publications/225117/aspek-hukum-perlindungan-konsumen-dalam-transaksi-elektronik-e-commerce-menghada>.

Kunu, Andi Bustamin Dg et al, “Penyuluhan Hukum tentang Pemahaman Perjanjian Kerja di SMKN 7 Palu” (2023) 3:6 J Abdi Masy Indones 1707–1712, online: <https://jamsi.jurnal-id.com/index.php/jamsi/article/view/986>.

Ningrum, Wulan Cahya, Yuniar Rahmatiar & Muhamad Abas, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Gadai Yang Objek Gadai Bukan Hak Milik Debitur (Studi Putusan Nomor 170/Pdt.G/2018/Pn Skt)” (2023) 5:1 UNES Law Rev 4219–4227.

Ramdhan, Satria Ilham & Ana Silviana, “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Gadai Swasta Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia” (2025) 18:1 J NOTARIUS 1–18.

Suwandi, “Kedudukan Jaminan Antara Utang-Piutang dan Rahn” (2021) 7:2 Jurisdictie J Huk dan Syariah.

INTERVIEW

Farlid, Rifki, Employee Interview at PT. Sarara Gadai Indonesia, by Rifki Farlid (2026).

WEBSITE

Hermanto, Rudi, “Perjanjian Utang Piutang dapat Mengalihkan Hak Atas Jaminan kepada Kreditur?”, (2025), online: <https://rhp-lawfirm.com/2025/05/02/perjanjian-utang-piutang-dapat-mengalihkan-hak-atas-jaminan-kepada-kreditur/>.

Usanti, Trisandini Prasastinah, “Bolehkah Penerima Gadai Menggunakan Barang Gadai?”, (2021), online: Huk Online <https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/bolehkah-penerima-gadai-menggunakan-barang-gadai-lt5e6cd571381af/>.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

Sabrina, R., Lakunna, R., & Saleh, M. (2026). Legal Protection for Customers in Electronic Goods Pawn-Deposit Agreements at PT Sarara Gadai Indonesia in Palu City. Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(2), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.12053

Issue

Section

Articles