Peran Filsafat Ilmu Fondasi Utama dalam Penelitian Akuntansi Multiparadigma

  • Marini Puwanto Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala
Abstract views: 332 , PDF downloads: 741
Keywords: Science phylosophy; Accounting Research; Multiparadigm

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of philosophy of science as the main foundation in multi-paradigm accounting research and the impact of accounting on social and environmental phenomena. Philosophy of science has a role in seeing multiparadigm in the development of accounting science. Accounting practice shows that accounting is growing, so there is a need for accounting research that can be carried out with a multi-paradigm approach. The emergence of multiparadigm, the interpretive paradigm was actually born because it saw a fundamental weakness of the functionalist paradigm, continued the critical paradigm which was born because it saw the weaknesses in the interpretive paradigm, the postmodernism paradigm appeared which was born because it found deviations in thinking that were fundamental to the functionalist paradigm with aspects of modernism. The new paradigm is complementary to the shortcomings of the previous paradigm, and in its development, each paradigm exists independently. Accounting is increasingly becoming a foundation for users of accounting information who can explain facts empirically through the results of research in the field of accounting with various paradigms in responding to increasingly dynamic social and environmental phenomena.

References

Burrell, Gibson and Gareth Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann.
Chua, Wai Fong. 1986. Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review LXI (4): 601-32.
Fay, B. 1987.Critical Social Science: Liberation and its Limits. NewYork: Cornell UP.
Fokkema, Doune. 1984. Literary History, Modernism,and Postmodernism. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co.
Gioia, Dennis A. and Evelyn Pitre. 1990. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review 15 (4): 584-602.
Hadiwinata, Bob Sugeng, 1994. ―Theatrum Politicum‖: Posmodernisme dan Krisis Kapitalisme Dunia. Kalam. Edisi 1: 23-31.
Lather, P. 1992. Critical frames in educational research: feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice Vol. XXXI, No. 2: 87-99.
Maricar, M. Husni, 2008. Filsaat Ilmu. Handout Kuliah. Jakarta.
Morgan, Gareth. 1988. Accounting as reality constuction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organization, and Society 13 (5) : 477 – 85.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1993. The Need for a Sacred Science. Richmond: Curzon Press.
Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
Rosenau, Pauline Marie. 1992. Post-modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roslender, Robin. 1992. Sociological Perspective on Modern Accountancy. London. Routledge.
Sarantakos, S. 1993. Social Research. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia Pty., Ltd.
Sugiharto, I. Bambang. 1996. Posmodernisme: Tantangan bagi Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Published
2022-12-31
Section
Articles