Cultural space and communication production at mount Kelud, Indonesia

Agus Wahyudi, Kacung Marijan, Siti Aminah

Abstract


The research aimed to understand the process of political communication in the contestation of Mount Kelud between the Blitar and the Kediri Regency Government in regional autonomy era. Mediation and legal efforts have been carried out to resolve Mount Kelud dispute, but the Central Government has not decided the administrative boundaries of the two Regencies since 2003. The research took the perspective of Henri Lefebvre's space production, which stated that space produced in the community’s daily life (social space) and produced by power (political space). The study used a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The findings of the study revealed that the Kediri Regency Government has carried out cultural construction and communication through the “Larung Sesaji” in Kelud Mountain Festival. Meanwhile, Blitar Regency has not done similar activity; even if it has conducted the Sesani “Larung Intan.” The central government could consider the cultural space on Mount Kelud as a synthesis of social space and political space as an effort to resolve disputes over regional boundaries.

Keywords


contestation; space production; cultural construction and communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, I. (2006). Kontruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. In Pustaka Pelajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Alvarez, I. P. (2016). The production of the segregated city: The case of São Paulo’s nova luz urban redevelopment project. Habitat International, 54, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.002

Aminah, S. (2016). Konflik dan Kontestasi Penataan Ruang Kota Surabaya. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v20i1.4751

Arifin, Z. (2019). Indepth Interview (28 May 2019).

Artanto, E. (2018). Indepth Interview (20 September 2018).

Aulia. (2019). Indepth Interview (11 January 2019).

Basuki, H. (2018). Indepth Interview (23 November 2018).

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1990). Tafsir Sosial Atas Kenyataan (Edisi ke 1). LP3S.

Brøgger, D. (2019). Urban diaspora space: Rural-urban migration and the production of unequal urban spaces. Geoforum, 102(July 2018), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.003

Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset : Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan (edisi 3). Pustaka Pelajar.

Cuc, M. C. (2014). Development of a Communication System for Capitalizing Cultural Diversity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.358

Dekel, T., Meir, A., & Alfasi, N. (2019). Formalising infrastructures, civic networks and production of space: Bedouin informal settlements in Be’er-Sheva metropolis. Land Use Policy, 81(September 2018), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.041

Elden, S. (2005). Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the possible. Choice Reviews Online, 42(06), 42-3339-42–3339. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-3339

Elden, S. (2007). There is a Politics of Space because Space is Political. Radical Philosophy Review, 10(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev20071022

Elden, S., Lebas, E., & Kofman, E. (2003). Henri Lefebvre : Key Writings. In Henri Lefebvre : Key Writings. Continoum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472546869

Fraser, B. (2015). Toward an Urban Cultural Studies (Henri Lefebvre and the Humanities). Palgrave Macmillan.

Fuchs, C. (2019). Henri Lefebvre's theory of the production of space and the critical theory of communication. Communication Theory, 29(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty025

Glass, M. R. (2016). Book review: Understanding the City: Henri Lefebvre and Urban Studies. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3128–3130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016664480

Glass, M. R., & Rose-Redwood, R. (2014). Performativity, politics, and the production of social space. In Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094587

Goonewardena, K. (2008). Space, Difference, Everyday Life (First Publ). Routledge.

Gorbuntsova, T., Dobson, S., & Palmer, N. (2019). Diverse geographies of power and spatial production: Tourism industry development in the Yamal Peninsula, Northern Siberia. Annals of Tourism Research, 76(March 2018), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.03.006

Gudel, B. (2018). Indepth Interview (11 November 2018).

Husserl, E. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology (Die Idee der Phanomenologie) (Lee Hardy (ed.); Published). Springer.

Jawa Pos Radar Blitar. (2015). Jawa Pos Radar Blitar, 14 Agustus 2015.

Jones, A. J. H. (2016). On South Bank: The Production of Public Space. In On South Bank: The Production of Public Space. Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315598833

Kamalipour, H., & Dovey, K. (2020). Incremental production of urban space: A typology of informal design. Habitat International, 98(July 2019), 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102133

Kamayanti. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi. Pengantar Religiusitas Keilmuan. Yayasan Rumah Paneleh.

Karplus, Y., & Meir, A. (2014). From congruent to non-congruent spaces: Dynamics of Bedouin production of space in Israel. Geoforum, 52, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.005

Leary, M. E. (2013). A Lefebvrian analysis of the production of glorious, gruesome public space in Manchester. Progress in Planning, 85, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2012.12.002

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. The Production of Space, 435. https://doi.org/10.2307/490789

Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution (p. 189). University of Minnesota Press.

Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis space-time and Everyday Life (p. 111). Continuum.

Lefebvre, H., Brenner, N., Elden, S., Moore, G., Brenner, N., & Elden, S. (2009). State, Space, World (First Publ). University of Minnesota Press.

Legenda Rakyat Kediri. (2018). Legenda Rakyat Kediri. Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri.

Luo, F., Moyle, B. D., Bao, J., & Zhong, Y. (2016). The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism: National Forest Parks in China. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.021

Luo, Y., & Chan, R. C. K. (2020). Production of coworking spaces: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Geoforum, 110(July 2019), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.008

M. Gottdiener. (1997). The Social Production of Urban Space (p. 317). University of Texas Press.

McGann, S. (2016). The production of Hospice space: Conceptualising the space of caring and dying. In The Production of Hospice Space: Conceptualising the Space of Caring and Dying (First Publ). Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553870

Merkin, R., Taras, V., & Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.10.004

Merrifield, A. (2006). Henri Lefebvre: A critical introduction. In Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203956779

Nicolosi, E. (2020). Counterspaces against the odds? The production and emancipatory potential of alternative spaces. Geoforum, 108(April 2018), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.016

Priyatno, E. (2019). Indepth Interview (21 May 2019).

Profil Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri. (2018). Profil Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri. Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri.

Robin, E. (2018). Performing real estate value(s): real estate developers, systems of expertise and the production of space. Geoforum, January, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.006

Ronggo. (2020). Indepth Interview (10 March 2020).

Sapta. (2019). Indepth Interview (23 January 2019).

Seo, S., & Skelton, T. (2017). Regulatory migration regimes and the production of space: The case of Nepalese workers in South Korea. Geoforum, 78, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.001

Soltani, B. (2018). Academic socialisation as the production and negotiation of social space. Linguistics and Education, 45, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.003

Theodoru. (2015). Hussler and Heideger on Reduction, Primordiality and Categorical, Contribution to Phenomenology. Springer Publishing.

Tombleson, B., & Wolf, K. (2017). Rethinking the circuit of culture: How participatory culture has transformed cross-cultural communication. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.017

Van den Berg, M., & Chevalier, D. (2018). Of “city lounges” “bans on gathering” and macho policies - Gender, class and race in productions of space for Rotterdam’s post-industrial future. Cities, 76, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.006

Widodo, A. (2019). Eksplorasi Peradaban Maritim Delta Sungai Brantas. November, 2019.

Winarso, S. (2018). Indepth Interview (9 November 2018).

www.merdeka.com. (2017). www.merdeka.com.

www.nasional.kompas.com. (2014). www.nasional.kompas.com.

Yanow, D. (2017). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 405–415). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192-41

Ye, C., Chen, M., Duan, J., & Yang, D. (2017). Uneven development, urbanisation and production of space in the middle-scale region based on the case of Jiangsu province, China. Habitat International, 66, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.013

Ye, C., Ma, X., Gao, Y., & Johnson, L. (2020). The lost countryside: Spatial production of rural culture in Tangwan village in Shanghai. Habitat International, 98(January), 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102137

Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., & Bosman, C. (2018). Towards a framework of public space governance. Cities, 78(January), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.010

Zhou, L., & Shin, J. H. (2017). Does stealing thunder always work? A content analysis of crisis communication practice in different cultural settings. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.08.004




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i3.2663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed By:

 

   

  

  

  

 

 

.

JSK' StatCounter Report