Cultural space and communication production at mount Kelud, Indonesia

  • Airlangga University
  • Airlangga University
  • Airlangga University
Abstract views: 1389 , PDF downloads: 291
Statement of Author downloads: 0
Keywords: contestation, space production, cultural construction and communication


The research aimed to understand the process of political communication in the contestation of Mount Kelud between the Blitar and the Kediri Regency Government in regional autonomy era. Mediation and legal efforts have been carried out to resolve Mount Kelud dispute, but the Central Government has not decided the administrative boundaries of the two Regencies since 2003. The research took the perspective of Henri Lefebvre's space production, which stated that space produced in the community’s daily life (social space) and produced by power (political space). The study used a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The findings of the study revealed that the Kediri Regency Government has carried out cultural construction and communication through the “Larung Sesaji” in Kelud Mountain Festival. Meanwhile, Blitar Regency has not done similar activity; even if it has conducted the Sesani “Larung Intan.” The central government could consider the cultural space on Mount Kelud as a synthesis of social space and political space as an effort to resolve disputes over regional boundaries.

Author Biographies

, Airlangga University
The Social Sciences Doctoral Program of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University
, Airlangga University
Professor of Political Science in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University
, Airlangga University
Lecturer of Political Science in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University


Abdullah, I. (2006). Kontruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. In Pustaka Pelajar. Pustaka Pelajar.
Alvarez, I. P. (2016). The production of the segregated city: The case of São Paulo’s nova luz urban redevelopment project. Habitat International, 54, 88–93.
Aminah, S. (2016). Konflik dan Kontestasi Penataan Ruang Kota Surabaya. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(1), 59–79.
Arifin, Z. (2019). Indepth Interview (28 May 2019).
Artanto, E. (2018). Indepth Interview (20 September 2018).
Aulia. (2019). Indepth Interview (11 January 2019).
Basuki, H. (2018). Indepth Interview (23 November 2018).
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1990). Tafsir Sosial Atas Kenyataan (Edisi ke 1). LP3S.
Brøgger, D. (2019). Urban diaspora space: Rural-urban migration and the production of unequal urban spaces. Geoforum, 102(July 2018), 97–105.
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset : Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan (edisi 3). Pustaka Pelajar.
Cuc, M. C. (2014). Development of a Communication System for Capitalizing Cultural Diversity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 63–67.
Dekel, T., Meir, A., & Alfasi, N. (2019). Formalising infrastructures, civic networks and production of space: Bedouin informal settlements in Be’er-Sheva metropolis. Land Use Policy, 81(September 2018), 91–99.
Elden, S. (2005). Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the possible. Choice Reviews Online, 42(06), 42-3339-42–3339.
Elden, S. (2007). There is a Politics of Space because Space is Political. Radical Philosophy Review, 10(2), 101–116.
Elden, S., Lebas, E., & Kofman, E. (2003). Henri Lefebvre : Key Writings. In Henri Lefebvre : Key Writings. Continoum.
Fraser, B. (2015). Toward an Urban Cultural Studies (Henri Lefebvre and the Humanities). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, C. (2019). Henri Lefebvre's theory of the production of space and the critical theory of communication. Communication Theory, 29(2), 129–150.
Glass, M. R. (2016). Book review: Understanding the City: Henri Lefebvre and Urban Studies. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3128–3130.
Glass, M. R., & Rose-Redwood, R. (2014). Performativity, politics, and the production of social space. In Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space. Routledge.
Goonewardena, K. (2008). Space, Difference, Everyday Life (First Publ). Routledge.
Gorbuntsova, T., Dobson, S., & Palmer, N. (2019). Diverse geographies of power and spatial production: Tourism industry development in the Yamal Peninsula, Northern Siberia. Annals of Tourism Research, 76(March 2018), 67–79.
Gudel, B. (2018). Indepth Interview (11 November 2018).
Husserl, E. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology (Die Idee der Phanomenologie) (Lee Hardy (ed.); Published). Springer.
Jawa Pos Radar Blitar. (2015). Jawa Pos Radar Blitar, 14 Agustus 2015.
Jones, A. J. H. (2016). On South Bank: The Production of Public Space. In On South Bank: The Production of Public Space. Ashgate Publishing.
Kamalipour, H., & Dovey, K. (2020). Incremental production of urban space: A typology of informal design. Habitat International, 98(July 2019), 102133.
Kamayanti. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi. Pengantar Religiusitas Keilmuan. Yayasan Rumah Paneleh.
Karplus, Y., & Meir, A. (2014). From congruent to non-congruent spaces: Dynamics of Bedouin production of space in Israel. Geoforum, 52, 180–192.
Leary, M. E. (2013). A Lefebvrian analysis of the production of glorious, gruesome public space in Manchester. Progress in Planning, 85, 1–52.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. The Production of Space, 435.
Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution (p. 189). University of Minnesota Press.
Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis space-time and Everyday Life (p. 111). Continuum.
Lefebvre, H., Brenner, N., Elden, S., Moore, G., Brenner, N., & Elden, S. (2009). State, Space, World (First Publ). University of Minnesota Press.
Legenda Rakyat Kediri. (2018). Legenda Rakyat Kediri. Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri.
Luo, F., Moyle, B. D., Bao, J., & Zhong, Y. (2016). The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism: National Forest Parks in China. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 47–55.
Luo, Y., & Chan, R. C. K. (2020). Production of coworking spaces: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Geoforum, 110(July 2019), 97–105.
M. Gottdiener. (1997). The Social Production of Urban Space (p. 317). University of Texas Press.
McGann, S. (2016). The production of Hospice space: Conceptualising the space of caring and dying. In The Production of Hospice Space: Conceptualising the Space of Caring and Dying (First Publ). Ashgate.
Merkin, R., Taras, V., & Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38(1), 1–23.
Merrifield, A. (2006). Henri Lefebvre: A critical introduction. In Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.
Nicolosi, E. (2020). Counterspaces against the odds? The production and emancipatory potential of alternative spaces. Geoforum, 108(April 2018), 59–69.
Priyatno, E. (2019). Indepth Interview (21 May 2019).
Profil Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri. (2018). Profil Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri. Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kediri.
Robin, E. (2018). Performing real estate value(s): real estate developers, systems of expertise and the production of space. Geoforum, January, 0–1.
Ronggo. (2020). Indepth Interview (10 March 2020).
Sapta. (2019). Indepth Interview (23 January 2019).
Seo, S., & Skelton, T. (2017). Regulatory migration regimes and the production of space: The case of Nepalese workers in South Korea. Geoforum, 78, 159–168.
Soltani, B. (2018). Academic socialisation as the production and negotiation of social space. Linguistics and Education, 45, 20–30.
Theodoru. (2015). Hussler and Heideger on Reduction, Primordiality and Categorical, Contribution to Phenomenology. Springer Publishing.
Tombleson, B., & Wolf, K. (2017). Rethinking the circuit of culture: How participatory culture has transformed cross-cultural communication. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 14–25.
Van den Berg, M., & Chevalier, D. (2018). Of “city lounges” “bans on gathering” and macho policies - Gender, class and race in productions of space for Rotterdam’s post-industrial future. Cities, 76, 36–42.
Widodo, A. (2019). Eksplorasi Peradaban Maritim Delta Sungai Brantas. November, 2019.
Winarso, S. (2018). Indepth Interview (9 November 2018). (2017). (2014).
Yanow, D. (2017). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 405–415). CRC Press.
Ye, C., Chen, M., Duan, J., & Yang, D. (2017). Uneven development, urbanisation and production of space in the middle-scale region based on the case of Jiangsu province, China. Habitat International, 66, 106–116.
Ye, C., Ma, X., Gao, Y., & Johnson, L. (2020). The lost countryside: Spatial production of rural culture in Tangwan village in Shanghai. Habitat International, 98(January), 102137.
Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., & Bosman, C. (2018). Towards a framework of public space governance. Cities, 78(January), 155–165.
Zhou, L., & Shin, J. H. (2017). Does stealing thunder always work? A content analysis of crisis communication practice in different cultural settings. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 1036–1047.
How to Cite
, , & . (2020). Cultural space and communication production at mount Kelud, Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 4(3), 682-699.