The impact of public information awareness and service towards public engagement

Cut Medika  Zellatifanny; Vience Mutiara  Rumata; Awit Marwati  Sakinah

doi:10.25139/jsk.v5i2.3477

Cut Medika Zellatifanny Ministry of Communication and Informatics
Vience Mutiara Rumata Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia
Awit Marwati Sakinah STMIK Tasikmalaya

https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i2.3477

Abstract views: 385 ,

PDF downloads: 415

Keywords: Public Information Disclosure, Public Information Service, public praticipation, Indonesia

Abstract

Public participation in policymaking remains a significant challenge in Indonesia. Previous studies found that public participation in the policymaking process is still dominated by the elite (i.e. policymakers). This paper argues that a lack of well-informed public causes diminishing public involvement in policymaking. This study aims to fill the gap in public participation study in Indonesia, particularly the impact of public information on public participation. This study measures to what extent public information awareness and public information service may form public participation behaviour. As quantitative research, this study uses a survey as the primary method to collect data. The questionnaire was constructed through concepts and legal documents related to public information disclosure and public information services. The multi-stage proportional random sampling is applied with the number of samples in this study is 1,584 in 25 provinces (out of 34 provinces). The results show that public information awareness significantly impacts public participation, while public information service satisfaction does not affect public participation.

References

Alibegović, D. J., & Slijepčević, S. (2015). Attitudes Towards Citizen Decision-Making Process: a Comparative Analysis. Dru[. Istra@. Zagreb God., 27(1), 155–175.

Arista, D. (2015). Transparansi informasi situs web pemerintah daerah di sulawesi selatan sebagai implementasi keterbukaan informasi publik. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Arnstein, S. R. (2007). Journal of the American Institute of Planners A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. (August 2012), 37–41.

Benitez, J. ., Henseler, J. ., Castillo, A. ., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least square: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2020), 1–16.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 107(2), 238–246.

BPS. (2018). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI) Tingkat Nasional 2017 Mengalami Peningkatan Dibandingkan dengan IDI Nasional 2016.

Duadji, N. (2013). Partisipasi publik dalam pengambilan keputusan anggaran pendapatan dan belanja daerah (APBD) Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 5(3), 197–203.

Édes, B. W. (2000). The Role of Public Administration in Providing Information Information Offices & Citizens Information Services.

Fudin, M., & Rahayu, A. (2019). Public Participation and the Disclosure of Public Information to Achieve Good Governance. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-6-2019.2288002

Gudowsky, N., & Bechtold, U. (2013). The Role of Information in Public Participation. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.152

Hair Jr, J. F., et al. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Harlow Pearson Education Limited.

He, G., Yeerkenbieke, G., & Baninla, Y. (2020). Public participation and information disclosure for environmental sustainability of 2022 winter Olympics. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187712

Hikmawati. (2013). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 1(1).

Komisi Informasi Pusat. The Regulation of Central Information Commission number 1 the year 2010 on Standard of Public Information Service. (2010).

Kristiyanto, E. N. (2016). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(2), 231–244.

Larasari, E. (2008). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik (Public Services Reform) dan Partisipasi Publik. DIALOGUE, 5(2), 254–267.

Li, W., Feng, T., Timmermans, H. J. P., Li, Z., Zhang, M., & Li, B. (2020). Analysis of citizens’ motivation and participation intention in urban planning. Cities, 106(September), 102921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102921

Liu, B., & Zhong, D. (2018). Evaluation of Government Information Service: A Case Study in China. Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Government, 125–134.

Lubis, M. ., Kusumasari, T. F. ., & Hakim, L. (2018). The Indonesia Public Information Disclosure Act (UU-KIP): Its Challenges and Responses. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 8(1).

Mardikanto, T. ., & Soebiato, P. (2017). Pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam perspektif kebijakan publik (fourth). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Mardiyanta, A. (2013). State of the art: Konsep partisipasi dalam ilmu administrasi publik. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 26, 227–242.

Mariana, D. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Kebijakan. Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(12), 216–229.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2019). Indonesia Kembali Dipercaya untuk Mendorong Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Tata Kelola Pemerintahan di Tingkat Global. Retrieved from https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/253/berita/indonesia-kembali-dipercaya-untuk-mendorong-transparansi-dan-akuntabilitas-tata-kelola-pemerintahan-di-tingkat-global

OECD. (2016). Open Government in Indonesia. In Far Eastern Survey.

Olsson, U. H., Foss, T. ., Troye, S. V. ., & Howell, R. . (2000). The Performance of ML, GLS, and WLS Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling Under Conditions of Misspecification and Nonnormality. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING, 7(4), 557–595. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_3

Open Government Partnership. (2018). Indonesia Open Government Partnership National Action Plan 2018-2020. Jakarta.

Parlindungan, R. (2019). Partisipasi Publik Dalam Proses Kebijakan Di Masa Reformasi. Jurnal Trias Politika, 3(1), 10–21.

Pew Research Center. (2019). Indonesians optimistic about their country’s democracy and economy as elections near. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/04/indonesians-optimistic-about-their-countrys-democracy-and-economy-as-elections-near/

President Decree No. 39 Year 2019 on Indonesian One Data. , (2019).

Quick, K., & Bryson, J. (2016). Theories of public participation in governance. In A. C. Torbing J (Ed.), Handbook of Theories of Governance.

Rahma, I. (2019). Partisipasi Publik Dan Keterbukaan Informasi Dalam Penyusunan Kebijakan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(1), 80–95.

Retnowati, E. (2012). Keterbukaan informasi publik dan good governance (antara das sein dan das sollen). Perspektif, 17(1), 54–61.

Rizky, R. C., Setiawan, E. ., & Nusyirwan. (2013). Ketakbiasan Dalam Model Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori (CFA) Pada Metode Pendugaan Kuadrat Terkecil Terboboti (Weighted Least Square) Untuk Data Ordinal. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 435–440.

Sebola, M. P. (2017). Communication in the South African Public Participation Process The Effectiveness of Communication Tools. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(6), 25–35. Retrieved from https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-754d2f95f?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf

Septiani, M. (2020). Strategi Mewujudkan Transparansi dan Partisipasi dalam Pelayanan Publik. 2020.

Steiger, J. . (2007). Understanding the Limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(2), 893–898.

The Law number 14 year 2008 on The Public Information Disclosure. , (2008).

Witarsyah, D., Sjafrizal, T., Fudzee, M. F., & Salamat, M. A. (2017). The Critical Factors Affecting E-Government Adoption in Indonesia : A Conceptual Framework. 7(1), 160–167.

Witianti, S., & Solihah, R. (2018). Faktor Kegagalan Dan Upaya Mengatasinya Dalam Proses Perumusan Kebijakan Publik Partisipatif Di Indonesia. Open Society Conference, Social and Political Challenges in Industrial Revolution 4.0 (BNBB), 635–649. UTCC.

Zaidi, F., Abdul, B., Muneerah, N., Kasim, B., Aminah, S., Harun, B., & Author, C. (2018). Relationship between Service Quality and e-Government Acceptance : The Role of Gender as a Moderator. 10(3), 859–866.