Construction of radicalism and communication in groups that are considered radical

  • Alfarabi Universitas Bengkulu
  • Panji Suminar Universitas Bengkulu
Abstract views: 219 , PDF downloads: 155
Keywords: construction, mass media, radicalism, SS group, stigma

Abstract

This study aims to determine the conditions that encourage the construction of radicalism in Bengkulu and how it affects the formation of communication patterns in the SS group who are considered exposed to radicalism. The theory used to understand the formation of the narrative of radicalism is the construction of social reality from Berger and Luckman. The research method uses a constructivist paradigm with a case study approach. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation, and literature review. The results of the study found that the construction of radicalism in the SS group was formed by two factors– the first was the SS group's rejection of long-standing community traditions such as tahlilan, grave pilgrimage, and yasinan; the second is the factor of the mass media showing terrorist actors who use the same symbols as the symbols worn by the SS group. The impact of the radicalism label is that the communication formed in the SS group is exclusive, while the village community applies one-way communication in understanding the SS group.

References

Adnan, M., & Amaliyah, A. (2021). Radicalism Vs Extremism: The Dilemma Of Islam and Politics in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.20.1.2021.24
Agastia, I. G. B. D., Perwita, A. A. B., & Subedi, D. B. (2020). Countering violent extremism through state-society partnerships: a case study of de-radicalisation programmes in Indonesia. Journal of Policing, Intelligence, and Counter-Terrorism, 15(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2020.1722317
Bakhori, S. (2004). Sardona Dihukum Sepuluh Tahun Penjara. Https://Nasional.Tempo.Co/Read/40076/Sardona-Dihukum-Sepuluh-Tahun-Penjara.
Chalmers, I. (2017). Countering Violent Extremism in Indonesia: Bringing Back the Jihadists. Asian Studies Review, 41(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2017.1323848
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset: Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan (I). Pustaka Pelajar.
Dharma, F. A. (2018). Konstruksi Realitas Sosial:Pemikiran Peter L. Berger Tentang Kenyataan Sosial. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v6i2.101
Febrini, D., Aisyah, & Khoiri, Q. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat Kota Bengkulu Mengenai Gerakan Islam Radikal. Manhaj, 4(1), 69–78.
Firmansyah. (2004). Mengapa Bengkulu Jadi Tempat Nyama Bagi Teroris. Https://Regional.Kompas.Com/Read/2014/08/07/15541731/Mengapa.Bengkulu.Jadi.Tempat.Nyaman.Bagi.Teroris.
Fitriana, A. (2016). Ini 12 Daerah yang Masuk Zona Merah Terorisme. Https://Regional.Kompas.Com/Read/2016/06/01/07410011/Ini.12.Daerah.Yang.Masuk.Zona.Merah.Terorisme.
Fuad, M. (2020). International Publications on Radicalism and Terrorism in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Assessment. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 5(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v5i1.8028
Hwang, J. C. (2017). The Disengagement of Indonesian Jihadists : Understanding the Pathways. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29(2), 277–295.
Julikawati, P. E. (2010). Kepala Polisi Bengkulu Minta Warga waspadai Teroris. Https://Nasional.Tempo.Co/Read/270671/Kepala-Polisi-Bengkulu-Minta-Warga-Waspadai-Teroris/Full&view=ok.
Karman. (2015). Konstruksi Realitas Sosial Sebagai Gerakan Pemikiran (Sebuah Telaah Teoretis Terhadap Konstruksi Realitas Peter L. Berger). Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Komunikasi Dan Informatika, 5(3), 11–23.
Lumentut, G. F., Paantow, J. T., & Waleleng, G. J. (2017). Pola Komunikasi Pemimpin Organisasi Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Kerja Anggota di LPM (Lembaga Pers Mahasiswa) Inovasi UNSRAT. Acta Diurna, VI(1), 1–14.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Muthohirin, N. (2015). Radikalisme Islam dan Pergerakannya di Media Sosial. Afkaruna, 11(2), 240–259. https://doi.org/DOI 10.18196/AIIJIS.2015. 0050. 240-259
Nursanti, S., Utamidewi, W., & Tayo, Y. (2021). Kualitas Komunikasi Keluarga tenaga kesehatan dimasa Pandemic Covid-19. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi 5(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i1.2817
Pektas, S. (2021). A comparative analysis of three Sunni Muslim organisations on ‘moderate’ and ‘radical’ Islam in Egypt, Morocco, and Indonesia. Religion, 51(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1868383
Putra, M. Y. (2020). Cadar, Jenggot Dan Terorisme Serta Sudut Pandang Ulama Klasik, Kontemporer Dan Ulama Indonesia. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 2(2), 202–232. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v2i2.402
Putro, Y. H. (2018). Densus 88 Gelar Operasi Senyap di Bengkulu, 6 Anggota JAD Ditangkap. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/Regional/Read/3616216/Densus-88-Gelar-Operasi-Senyap-Di-Bengkulu-6-Anggota-Jad-Ditangkap.
Sary, N. (2017). Mencegah Penyebaran Paham Radikalisme Pada Sekolah. Manthiq, 2(2), 191–200.
Schmidt, L. (2021). Aesthetics of authority: ‘Islam Nusantara’ and Islamic ‘radicalism’ in Indonesian film and social media. Religion, 51(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1868387
Siswoyo, H. (2017, November 29). Benih-Benih Radikal Tumbuh di Tanah Sunyi. Https://Www.Viva.Co.Id/Indepth/Fokus/982497-Benih-Benih-Radikal-Tumbuh-Di-Tanah-Sunyi.
Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., & Hidayat, M. A. (2020). Channelization strategies of radicalism among Muslim university students in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 14(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2020.14.2.309-334
Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., & Sirry, M. (2020). The shift from consumers to prosumers: Susceptibility of young adults to radicalization. Social Sciences, 9(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9040040
Supono, A. (2017, November 28). Survei: Potensi Radikalisme Patut Diwaspadai. Http://Rri.Co.Id/Post/Berita/461816/Nasional/Survei_potensi_radikalisme_patut_diwaspadai.Html.
Suyono, S., Nugroho, K., & Windyastuti, D. (2021). Analysis of patron-client political communication in building a network of political power in the village community. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 5(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i1.3099
Syafirdi, D. (2017, November 28). Survei BNPT; Lima Daerah Ini Memiliki Potensi Radikal Cukup Tinggi. Https://Www.Merdeka.Com/Peristiwa/Survei-Bnpt-Lima-Daerah-Ini-Memiliki-Potensi-Radikal-Cukup-Tinggi.Html.
Terkini, R. (2019). Teroris Bebas Bersyarat. Https://Bengkuluekspress.Com/Teroris-Bebas-Bersyarat/.
Widyaningrum, A. Y., & Dugis, N. S. (2018). Terorisme Radikalisme dan Identitas Keindonesiaan. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 2(1), 32–67. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v2i1.368
Published
2022-03-20
How to Cite
Alfarabi, & Suminar, P. (2022). Construction of radicalism and communication in groups that are considered radical. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 6(1), 54-72. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/jsk/article/view/4431
Section
Articles