Press freedom and censorship during Covid-19 pandemic: the case of Cebu City

  • Kenneth Michael M Baba University of the Philippines Cebu
  • Kent Andrei S. Alkuino University of the Philippines Cebu
  • Ezra P. Tictic University of the Philippines Cebu
  • Ana Leah Dungog-Cuizon Dungog-Cuizon University of the Philippines Cebu
Abstract views: 3622 , PDF downloads: 1024
Keywords: cebu city, cencorship, covid-19 pandemic, media, press freedom


Censorship, in all its forms, has always been a means by which freedom is being checked and regulated. In hindsight, for the state and its people, censorship must always be exercised with caution to avoid suppression of the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the press. Moreover, freedom of the press is crucial in times of crisis, as in the case of a global pandemic named COVID-19. The Philippines, regarded as the world's texting capital and one of the widest in social media use, feel the convenience of getting the news right at the fingertips, apart from avoiding physical contact in compliance with health protocols. The study zeroes in on Cebu City, regarded as one of the country's largest voting populations and a newsmaker in terms of its policies vis-a-vis the pandemic. It delves into the juxtaposition of press freedom and censorship in Cebu City against the backdrop of the pandemic. This study is anchored on Bunn’s New Censorship Theory, Scammel’s foundations on the Index of Censorship, and the ever-developing Libertarian Theory. Further, it employed the Colaizzi method to explore the experiences of Cebu-based media practitioners and media institutions. In this vein, press freedom and censorship are not mutually exclusive. The presence of one does not preclude the other; they can actually co-exist. The exercise of press freedom very well depends on the personal values of the media practitioners and institutions.


Abbasl, I.S. & Al-Sharql, L. (2015). Media Censorship: Freedom Versus Responsibility. Academic Journals, 7(4), pp 21-25. DOI: 10.5897/JLCR2015.0207
American Civil Liberties Union. (2017). Anti-protest bills around the country. ACLU.Org. Retrieved from
Annual Report on Press Freedom. (2017). Freedom of the Press 2017 - Venezuela. Freedom House.
Article 19 and the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility. (2005). Freedom of Expression and the Media in the Philippines. A Part of a Series of Baseline Studies on Seven Southeast Asian Countries. ISBN 1 902598 80 6
Bajracharya, Shraddha. (2018). Libertarian Theory of Mass Communication. In Businesstopia. Retrieved from
Bernadas, J. & Ilagan, K. (2020). Journalism, Public Health, and COVID-19: Some Preliminary Insights from the Philippines. Media International Australia 2020, 177(1) 132–138.
Bunn, M. (2015). Reimagining Repression: New Censorship Theory And After. History and Theory, 54(1).
Chavez vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 168338 (15 February, 2008) [Supreme Court of the Philippines]
Dunham, J. (2017). Press Freedom’s Dark Horizon. Freedom House. Retrieved from
European Country of Origin Information Network. (n.d.). Freedom in the World 2021 – Venezuela. Retrieved from
France 24. (2020). Duterte’s History Clashes with Philippine Media. France24. Retrieved from
Freedom for Media, Freedom for All Network. (2020). Press Freedom Further Restricted Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved from
Gunatilleke, G. (2021). Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression. Human Rights Review 22, 91-108.
Gutierrez, J. (2020). Leading Philippine Broadcaster, Target of Duterte’s Ire, Forced Off the Air. The New York Times. Retrieved from
Haggard, S. & You, J. (2014). Freedom of Expression in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 45:1,167- 179. DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2014.947310
History. (2018). Freedom of the Press. Retrieved from constitution/freedom-of-the-press#section_5
Howie, E. (2017). Protecting the Human right to freedom of expression in International Law. International Law Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20:1, 12-15. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1392612
Human Rights Watch. (2021). COVID-19 Triggers Wave of Free Speech Abuse. HRW.Org. Retrieved from
Kurlantzick, J. (2020). Addressing the Effect of COVID-19 on Democracy in South and Southeast Asia. Council on Foreign Relations. ISBN 978-0-87609-250-7.
Lessner, C. (2018). Democracy Needs a Free Press. Maine Policy Review, 27(2), 62-63.
Limpitlaw, J. (2016). Media Law Handbook for Eastern Africa Volume 2. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Regional Media Programme: Sub-Saharan Africa. ISBN: 978-0-9870243-4-3
Ndavula, J. (2020). How COVID-19 Has Worsened Attacks Against Journalists in Kenya. The Conversation. Retrieved from
Park, C.M. & Shin, D.C.(2006). Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?. Asian Survey 46 (3): 341–361.
RSF Reporters Without Borders. (2020). 2020 World Press Freedom Index.
Sapanta, M. (2021). Promotion of Queso Festival: A Socio-Cultural Analysis. [UNPUBLISHED THESIS]
Scammell, M. (1981). How Index on Censorship Started. Index on Censorship, 10(6), 6-69. doi:10.1080/03064228108533274.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19. Retrieved from
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from
UN Human Rights Committee. (2011). General Comment No. 34, Article 19, Freedoms of opinion and expression (Human Rights Committee, 102nd session). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from
Von Münchow, S. (2020). The Security Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Connections, 19(2), 5-9.
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article III Section IV
How to Cite
Baba, K. M. M., Alkuino, K. A. S., Tictic, E. P., & Dungog-Cuizon, A. L. D.-C. (2022). Press freedom and censorship during Covid-19 pandemic: the case of Cebu City. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 6(2), 383-402.