Komunikasi simbolik kelompok Gay Semarang

  • Sheila Lestari Giza Pudrianisa Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta
Abstract views: 802 , PDF downloads: 2815
Keywords: symbolic communication, symbolic convergency theory, gay group semarang, verbal and non verbal communication

Abstract

LBHM survey on 2019 mentioned that LGBT groups often experience stigma and discrimination. Although it is widely discussed, it is not easy to access information about these groups. Thus, the problem focuses on how the Semarang gay group uses symbolic communication so that the public can see the symbols used by the Semarang gay group to interact and communicate. This research uses a constructivism paradigm with the qualitative descriptive method and Symbolic Convergence as the main theory. As a result, fantasy exchange creates various communication symbols that converge in the form of verbal (effeminate language/oral and written) and non-verbal (object language, action language and sign language) and are mutually agreed upon as identities to form group cohesiveness. Bad experiences such as stigma/discrimination are the basis for creating safe and easy-to-understand communication symbols between members in exchanging messages and meanings that become the group's motives.

References

Adi, A. N., Erlandia, D. R., dan Venus, A. (2016). Motif Anggota Komunitas Musik B Bandung. Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi Motif, 1(2), 1–158.
Amanda, A. N. N. (2018). Tinjauan HAM terhadap kelompok LGBT di kawasan Asia Tenggara (studi kasus Indonesia - Thailand). Journal Of International And Local Studies, 2(1), 101–110.
Andriani, L., dan Khasiah, Z. (2016). Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Komunikasi ASPIKOM, 2(6).
Ardiyasi. (2019). perilaku seks abnormal perspektif tafsir al-azhar. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Aseri, M. (2018). Politik Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v0i0.57
Bordieu, P., & Bourdieu, P. (1993). Outline of a Sociological Theory of Art Perception. In R. Johnson (Ed.), Cambridge studies in social anthropology (Vol. 16, Issue 16, p. 248). Polity Press.
Budyatna, M. (2015). Teori-teori Mengenai Komunikasi Antar Pribadi. Prenamedia Group.
Dr. Yasir., M. S. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi Sebuah Pendekatan Kritis dan Komperhensif. CV. Budi Utama.
Firdiana, N. (2019). Perilaku Komunikasi Gay di Yayasan Gaya Nusantara Kota Surabaya. April, 33–35.
Hajaroh, M. (2010). Paradigma, Pendekatandan Metode Penelitian Fenomenologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1–21.
Herdanindita, E., Prabamurti, P. N., & Widjanarko, B. (2020). Gambaran Perilaku Pemanfaatan VCT (Voluntary Counseling and Testing) pada LSL di LSM SGC (Semarang Gaya Community) Kota Semarang. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-Journal), 8(2), 284–292.
Jamal, A. (2001). The story of Lot and the Qur'ān's perception of the morality of same-sex sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 41(1), 1–88. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v41n01_01
Khoir, A. B. (2020). LGBT, Muslim, and Heterosexism: The Experiences of Muslim Gay in Indonesia. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v5i1.8067
Kusumawati, T. I. (2016). Komunikasi Verbal Dan Nonverbal. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 6(2).
Listiorini, D., Asteria, D., & Sarwono, B. (2019). Moral panics on lgbt issues: evidence from indonesian tv programme. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 3(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v3i3.1882
Mardiani, D. (2017). Pemaknaan Media Sosial Bagi Kaum Homoseksual : Studi Fenomenologi pada Pengguna Grindr.
Megasari, K., Ardhiyanti, Y., & Syukaisih. (2017). fenomena perilaku penyimpangan seksual LGBT. Fenomena Perilaku Penyimpangan Seksual Oleh LGBT, XI(78), 1–10.
Papilaya, J. O. (2016). Lesbian, gay, biseksual, transgender (LGBT) dan keadilan sosial. Jurnal Humaniora Yayasan Bina Darma, 3(1), 25–34.
Prasanti, D., & Indriani, S. S. (2018). Konvergensi Simbolik Tentang Percakapan Remaja Laki-Laki Dalam Media Sosial Group Line. Jurnal Komunikasi Universitas Garut: Hasil Pemikiran Dan Penelitian, 4(1), 1–8.
Puspitasari, C. I. I. (2019). Opresi kelompok minoritas: Persekusi dan diskriminasi LGBT di Indonesiaa. Takammul : Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam Serta Perlindungan Anak, 8(1), 83–102.
Putra, A., Swandi, I. W., & ... (2021). Perancangan Media Kampanye Menanggulangi Resiko Infeksi Menular Seksual Pada Lgbt Oleh Yayasan Gaya Dewata Di Denpasar. Amarasi: Jurnal …, 152–163.
Ramadhan, Y. F. (2016). Pola Komunikasi Antarpribadi dan Motivasi Intimate Relationship pada Pasangan Pacaran Gay dan Lesbian. Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(1), 1–16.
Setiawan, A. A. dan J. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV Jejak.
Sudarsono, B., & Madura, U. T. (n.d.). Analisis budaya organisasi terhadap manajemen hasil karya pada koperasi darma bakti wanita perumnas kamal. 58–62.
Suryadi, I. (2010). Teori Konvergensi Simbolik. Jurnal Academica Fisip Untad, 2(02), 426–437.
Tamilchelvan, S., & Rashid, R. A. (2017). Being a Muslim gay man: A systematic review. Trames, 21(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2017.3.05
Teresia, G. (2019). Kelompok Minoritas Seksual Dalam Terpaan Pelanggaran HAM.
Yansyah, R., & Rahayu, R. (2018). Globalisasi Lesbian, Gay, Biseksual, Dan Transgender (Lgbt): Perspektif Ham Dan Agama Dalam Lingkup Hukum Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 14(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i1.20242
Yulius, H. (2015). Coming Out. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Published
2022-07-30
How to Cite
Pudrianisa, S. L. G. (2022). Komunikasi simbolik kelompok Gay Semarang. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 6(2), 699-718. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i2.4929
Section
Articles