Aktivisme digital kebijakan pencegahan dan penanganan kekerasan seksual
Abstract views: 893
,
PDF downloads: 642
Abstract
This article describes the process of digital activism carried out by a coalition of pros and cons regarding the ratification of policies on the prevention and handling of sexual violence in tertiary institutions as well as the effectiveness of digital activism from the two coalitions in terms of the implications for policy implementation. This article uses a qualitative content analysis method by analyzing Twitter messages containing the hashtags and keywords Permendikbudristek, Permendikbud, #RevokePermendikbudristekNo30, and #DukungPermendikbud30. The choice of these hashtags was based on the urgency to be able to review public opinion on the ratification of Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 based on the pros and cons categories so that the implications could then be analyzed for the policy implementation of preventing and handling sexual violence. The data obtained in this study were analysed using the theory of digital activism stages which consist of triggering phases, media reactions, viral organizations, and direct action. In addition, data analysis is also focused on reviewing the effectiveness of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions based on several factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism in achieving its goals, starting from public involvement, long-term strategic plans, mass mobilization, and the level of support received. The results of the analysis show that the stages of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions started with the emergence of a triggering phase which was based on the incompatibility of the substance of the policy with the values shared by several community groups, then was strengthened by the presence of a fairly high media reaction, in this case, social media Twitter. Even though it was not accompanied by the emergence of a viral organisation, there was a direct action by the counter coalition. Furthermore, the results of the analysis also show that the effectiveness of digital activism by counter-parties is categorized as low compared to digital activism carried out by pro-parties based on the achievement of factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism.
References
Abdo, A. (2018). Facebook is Shaping Public Discourse, We Need to Understand How. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/15/facebook-twitter-social-media-public-discourse
Amal, B. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Frasa “Tanpa Persetujuan Korban” dalam Permendikbud Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual. CREPIDO, 3(2), 86-95.
BBC. (2021). Pandemi Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus dan Permendikbud 30: Mengapa Tanpa Persetujuan Korban Dimaknai Pelegalan Kebebasan Seks? https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-59265939
Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of political marketing, 10(1-2), 189-213.
Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. John Wiley & Sons.
Galego, D. (2018). Social Movements’ Influence on Public Policy: Goals, Actions and Outcomes. Public Governance Institute.
George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100249.
Global Health Advocacy Incubator. (2020). Ghai Releases New Digital Tools for Advocacy Campaign Planning. https://advocacyincubator.org/2020/06/22/ghai-releases-new-digital-tools-for-advocacy-campaign-planning/
Jati, W. R. (2016). Aktivisme kelas menengah berbasis media sosial: Munculnya relawan dalam pemilu 2014. Jurnal Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.
Johansson, H., & Scaramuzzino, G. (2019). The logics of digital advocacy: Between acts of political influence and presence. New media & society, 21(7), 1528-1545.
Katadata. (2021). Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Pendidikan Terus Meningkat, Ini Datanya. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/03/10/kekerasan-seksual-di-lingkungan-pendidikan-terus-terjadi-ini-datanya
Kaun, A & Uldam, J. (2017). Digital Activism: Aer the Hype. New Media & Society, 00(0), hal.1–8.
Kemdikbud. (2022). MA Tolak Gugatan Judicial Review Permendikbudristek Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2022/04/ma-tolak-gugatan-judicial-review-permendikbudristek-pencegahan-dan-penanganan-kekerasan-seksual
Klandermans, P. G. (2015). Motivations to Action. In D. Della Porta, & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements Oxford Universitypress. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.30
Komnas Perempuan. (2020). Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Pendidikan. http://komnasperempuan.go.id/uploadedFiles/webOld/file/pdf_file/2020/Lembar%20Fakta%20KEKERASAN%20SEKSUAL%20DI%20LINGKUNGAN%20PENDIDIKAN%20(27%20Oktober%202020).pdf
Kou, Y., Kow, Y. M., Gui, X., & Cheng, W. (2017). One social movement, two social media sites: A comparative study of public discourses. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(4), 807-836.
Kristina. (2021). Poin-poin Penting Permendikbud Nomor 30 Tahun 2021. https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-5810594/poin-poin-penting-permendikbud-nomor-30-tahun-2021
Lubis, S. (2007). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Demokrasi, 6(1).
MaPPI FHUI. (2022). Komentar Tertulis sebagai Amicus Curiae (Sahabat Pengadilan) pada Perkara dengan Register No. 34P/HUM/2022 di Mahkamah Agung RI.
Pradana, A. P. (2020). Aktivisme Siber dan Jejaring Aktor: Studi Kasus Tagar# JogjaOraDidol di Media Sosial Twitter (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Ringeling, A. (2015). How public is public administration? A constitutional approach of publicness. Teaching Public Administration, 33(3), 292-312.
Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130-143.
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements. Government information quarterly, 31(3), 365-378.
Scott, J. B. (2021). Digital Failures in Abolitionist Ethnography. Social Analysis, 65(1), 123-132.
Selander, L., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2016). Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS quarterly, 40(2), 331-352.
Sellers, M. N. S. (2003). The Origins of Republican Legal Theory. In Republican Legal Theory (pp. 6-15). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Selvia, F. (2020). Jejaring Aktor Gerakan Sosial Gejayan Memanggil (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Silva, G. E. (2015). Social movements, protest, and policy. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 27-39.
Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of public relations research, 26(5), 384-398.
Taylor, M. P. (2021). All talk and No action? A comparative analysis of nonprofit twitter chats. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1-16.
Tempo. (2022). Gugatan Permendikbud 30 Ditolak, Kemendikbud Apresiasi Dukungan Masyarakat Sipil. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1583646/gugatan-permendikbud-30-ditolak-kemendikbud-apresiasi-dukungan-masyarakat-sipil
Werenfridus, M. (2022). Map Analysis of The Pro-Con Arguments Against Permendikbud 30 Of Sexual Violence (Doctoral dissertation, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik).
Zahira, D. & Hermanadi, H. (2021). Memetakan Aliran Aktivisme Digital: Sebuah Pergerakan Sosial. Center for Digital Society (CFDS).6
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Studi Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal (comments to the editor can be added below).
