Exploring indirect communication strategies in the educational organisation: perspective from Jakarta, Indonesia

Eshauqi Fitrayatra; Engkus  Kuswarno; Ilham Gemiharto

doi:10.25139/jsk.v7i3.6635

Eshauqi Fitrayatra Universitas Padjadjaran
Engkus Kuswarno Universitas Padjadjaran
Ilham Gemiharto Universitas Padjadjaran

https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v7i3.6635

Abstract views: 174 ,

PDF downloads: 88

Keywords: educational organisation; ethnographic study; indirect communication strategies

Abstract

This study investigates the use of indirect communication strategies within an educational institution in Jakarta, Indonesia, focusing on discussing their significance in achieving communication objectives within professional contexts. The primary emphasis is on how these indirect communication strategies are applied to cultivate supportive relationships and create a favourable professional environment within educational settings. The following research questions guide the ethnographic study: 1) How are indirect communication strategies employed in educational organisations? and 2) What factors influence the adoption of these communication strategies? This research utilised four data collection methods: participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. Participants in this study included school principals, vice-principals, teachers, support staff, students, and parents from a state primary school in Jakarta, Indonesia. The study's findings reveal that indirect communication strategies are predominantly employed to achieve various communication objectives, such as conveying humour, expressing frustration, delivering implied messages, seeking assistance, and expressing uncertainty. These strategies are deeply rooted in the cultural context, particularly influenced by Betawi culture, which strongly emphasises preserving social harmony and promoting respectful interactions. Several influential factors, including shared cultural values, power dynamics, and age, were identified as elements affecting the adoption of these indirect communication strategies.

References

AlAfnan, M. A. (2014). Politeness in business writing: The effects of ethnicity and relating factors on email communication. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2014.

Bigdeli, P., & Doroudi, H. (2021). Investigating the impact of Strengthening Employees' Communication Skills on Extra-Role Performance with the Mediating Role of Communication Effectiveness. Governance and Development Journal, 1(2)

Câmpeanu-Sonea, E., Sonea, A., Gabor-Supuran, R., & Muresan, A. (2011). Organisational competence development framework. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society. Proceedings, 48.

Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 61-88). Springer.

Dai, Y., Li, H., Xie, W., & Deng, T. (2022). Power distance belief and workplace communication: The mediating role of fear of authority. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2932.

Flamson, T. J., & Bryant, G. A. (2013). Signals of Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, 1, 49.

Furqon, C. (2003). Hakikat komunikasi organisasi. Hakikat Komunikasi Organisasi, 2(15), 1-9.

Furxhi, G., & Dollija, E. (2021). An analysis of factors that impact the change management process. Technology transfer: innovative solutions in Social Sciences and Humanities, 18-20.

Harvey, J. H., & Wenzel, A. (2006). Theoretical perspectives in the study of close relationships. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 35-49.

Hossain, M. I. (2023). Global Citizens, Civic Responsibility, and Intercultural Communication in a Rapidly Globalising Multicultural World: Community Revitalisation and Reflective Practise. Ethnopolitics, 1-28.

Huang, L., Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for expressers and recipients. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 131, 162-177.

Inesi, M. E., Adams, G. S., & Gupta, A. (2021). When it pays to be kind: The allocation of indirect reciprocity within power hierarchies. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 165, 115-126.

Jackson, B. W. (2014). Theory and practice of multicultural organisation development. The NTL handbook of organisation development and change, 175-192.

Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., De Luque, M. S., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67-90.

Khristoforova, I. V., Popova, J. S., Makeeva, D. R., Shtrafina, E. D., & Arkhipova, T. N. (2015). Innovative development of higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 594.

Kirkhaug, R. (2009). The management of meaning–conditions for perception of values in a hierarchical organisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 317-324.

Kreuz, R. (2020). Irony and sarcasm. MIT Press.

Kristiani, W., Matin, M., & Sugiarto, S. (2019). The effect of organisational culture and perceived organisational support (POS) towards organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) Teacher SDK PENABUR Jakarta. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(6), 528-532.

Kulbayeva, A. (2020). Balancing power and solidarity through indirectness: A case study of Russian and Kazakh meeting chairs. Journal of Politeness Research, 16(2), 159-191.

Kung, F. Y., & Scholer, A. A. (2018). Message framing influences perceptions of feedback (in) directness. Social Cognition, 36(6), 626-670.

Kuswarno, E. (2008). Ethnography of communication. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017). Self-managing organisations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organising. Research in organisational behaviour, 37, 35-58.

McNamara, N., Stevenson, C., Costa, S., Bowe, M., Wakefield, J., Kellezi, B., Wilson, I., Halder, M., & Mair, E. (2021). Community identification, social support, and loneliness: The benefits of social identification for personal well‐being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1379-1402.

Merkin, R. S., & Merkin, R. S. (2018). Power distance, receiver facework, innovation, and superior-subordinate relationships. Saving Face in Business: Managing Cross-Cultural Interactions, 165-195.

Miehle, J., Minker, W., & Ultes, S. (2022). When to say what and how: Adapting the elaborateness and indirectness of spoken dialogue systems. Dialogue & Discourse, 13(1), 1-40.

Musheke, M. M., & Phiri, J. (2021). The effects of effective communication on organisational performance based on the systems theory. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), 659-671.

Mykhailyshyn, H., Kondur, O., & Serman, L. (2018). Innovation of education and educational innovations in conditions of modern higher education institutions.

Nas, P. J. (2022). Jakarta Batavia: Socio-cultural essays (Vol. 187). Brill.

Pirzadeh, P., Lingard, H., & Blismas, N. (2020). Effective communication in the context of safe design decision-making. Safety Science, 131, 104913.

Purbasari, M. (2010). The beauty of Betawi. Humanities, 1(1), 1-10.

Rafay, A., & Ozbutun, E. (2023). Why are some people better than others? Is it because of their cultural background, personal competence, or the company's influence?

Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Mann, K. V., Pisarski, E. E., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2018). About politeness, face, and feedback: Exploring resident and faculty perceptions of how institutional feedback culture influences feedback practices. Academic Medicine, 93(9), 1348-1358.

Ruslan, A., Karlinah, S., Hidayat, D. R., & Kuswarno, E. (2021). Discourse and Identity in the Indonesian Short Animation" Si Pitung". Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5).

Saunders, G. H., Jackson, I. R., & Visram, A. S. (2021). Impacts of face coverings on communication: An indirect impact of COVID-19. International Journal of Audiology, 60(7), 495-506.

Siregar, I., Anjani, S. D., & Yahaya, S. R. (2023). Projection of the Vitality of the Betawi Language in the Future Time in Jakarta. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(3), 39-46.

Sitdikova, F. B., & Asmolovskaya, M. V. (2021). Implicatures in the context of communicative act. Revista EntreLinguas, e021049-e021049.

Skinner, J. (2013). The interview: An ethnographic approach (Vol. 49). A&C Black.

Stevens, R. J. (2004). Why do educational innovations come and go? What do we know? What can we do? Teaching and teacher education, 20(4), 389-396.

Syakur, A., Susilo, T. A. B., Wike, W., & Ahmadi, R. (2020). Sustainability of communication, organisational culture, cooperation, trust and leadership style for lecturer commitments in higher education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1325-1335.

Tirtosudarmo, R. (2022). Managing Multicultural Society in Indonesia. ISLAM NUSANTARA: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture, 3(2), 21-38.

Virgana, V., & Kasyadi, S. (2020). The effect of organisational culture, personality, job satisfaction, and trust on school supervisor performance. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(3), 434-441.

Wasino, W. (2013). Indonesia: from pluralism to multiculturalism. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 23(2).

Widhiastuti, H. (2012). The effectiveness of communications in hierarchical organisational structure. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 185.

Yusoff, W., Baharuddin, K. H., Azlan, M. A. K., & Mohamed, A. F. (2014). Investigating the implementation of indirect communication strategy among practical training students in the workplace context.