Political communication model: the campaign narratives on Ganjar Pranowo’s YouTube account
Abstract views: 373
,
PDF downloads: 317
Abstract
Technological advancement has also been used by a number of politicians to express themselves on social media as means of boosting their popularity. This phenomenon is very useful for building political communication in virtual spaces. Therefore, this research examines Ganjar Pranowo's political communication model through his campaign narrative displayed via his personal YouTube account. This research is qualitative research using descriptive and analytical methods in studying Ganjar Pranowo's political communication model. Data collection techniques include selecting content related to the campaign narrative of the @GanjarPranowo’s YouTube account as the primary source. Political communication theory and the elements of argumentation skills– ethos, pathos, and logos. The results of this research found that Ganjar Pranowo used YouTube as a digital platform to build political communication through various content about the campaign. Video content through its campaign narrative enablesGanjar Pranowo to effectively use the elements of ethos, pathos and logos.
References
Abdillah, FM, & Zulhazmi, AZ (2021). Digital campaigns, local politics and social media. IQTIDA: Journal of Da'wah and Communication , 1 (1), 57–75. https://e-journal.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/iqtida/article/view/3752
Ahmed, S., Masood, M., & Wang, Y. (2024). Empowering the religious minority: examining the mobilizing role of social media for online political participation in an Asian democracy. Asian Journal of Communication , 34 (2), 135–155. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01292986.2024.2317314
Alon, AT, Rahimi, ID, & Tahar, H. (2024). Fighting fake news on social media: a comparative evaluation of digital literacy interventions. Current Psychology , 1–19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-024-05668-4
Altay, S., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). News can help! The impact of news media and digital platforms on awareness of and belief in misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 29 (2), 459–484. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/19401612221148981
Amsalem, E., & Zoizner, A. (2023). Do people learn about politics on social media? A meta-analysis of 76 studies. Journal of Communication , 73 (1), 3–13. https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/73/1/3/6726545?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
APJII. (2023). Association of Internet Service Users in Indonesia . https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjY2tbHmqiAAxWsxzgGHczrCrMQFnoECBEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fapjii.or.id%2Fberita%2Fd%2Fsurvey- apjii-internet-users-in-Indonesia-reached-215-million-people&usg=AOvVaw1swMjPcK
Arendt, F. (2024). The Media and Democratization: A Long-Term Macro-Level Perspective on the Role of the Press During a Democratic Transition. Political Communication , 41 (1), 26–44.
Armstrong, M. A., Rice, C. A. G., & Warwick, B. (2022). The visual communication of Brexit in Northern Ireland: decoding public imagery on identity, politics and Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance , 1–19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/21622671.2022.2115544?needAccess=true
Aydemir, N. (2023). Framing Syrian refugees in Turkish politics: a qualitative analysis on party group speeches. Territory, Politics, Governance , 11 (4), 658–676. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21622671.2021.2012247
Barberá, P., Gohdes, A. R., Iakhnis, E., & Zeitzoff, T. (2024). Distract and divert: How world leaders use social media during contentious politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 29 (1), 47–73. https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/abs/10.1177/19401612221102030?cookieSet=1&_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=tc
Botan, M. (2024). The Romanian Media System: Dynamics, Challenges, and Implications for Democracy. Cogitatio , 12 , 1–17. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7847/3688
Boulianne, S., Oser, J., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2023). Powerless in the digital age? A systematic review and meta-analysis of political efficacy and digital media use. New Media & Society , 25 (9), 2512–2536. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614448231176519
Bueno, N.S., Zucco, C., & Nunes, F. (2023). What You See and What You Get: Direct and Indirect Political Dividends of Public Policies. British Journal of Political Science , 53 (4), 1273–1292. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/what-you-see-and-what-you-get-direct-and-indirect-political-dividends- of-public-policies/50B1E448E2EC60D06A7CFFE95E9BF2DF
Carter, M.C., Cingel, D.P., Ruiz, J.B., & Wartella, E. (2023). Social media use in the context of the Personal Social Media Ecosystem Framework. Journal of Communication , 73 (1), 25–37. https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/73/1/25/6825424?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
Cassell, K. J. (2023). The populist communication strategy in comparative perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 28 (4), 725–746. https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/abs/10.1177/19401612211055695?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=tc
Chan, M., Yi, J., & Kuznetsov, D. (2022). Government digital repression and political engagement: A cross-national multilevel analysis examining the roles of online surveillance and censorship. The International Journal of Press/Politics . https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/abs/10.1177/19401612221117106?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc#core-collateral-purchase-access
Chatterjee, J., & Dutta, G. (2024). Power of Social Media in Political Marketing – An India Based Empirical Study. Studies in Media and Communication , 12 (1), 242–253. https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6633/6414
Cheng, Z., Zhang, B., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2023). Antecedents of political consumerism: Modeling online, social media and WhatsApp news use effects through political expression and political discussion. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 28 (4), 995–1016. https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/full/10.1177/19401612221075936?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=tc
Dadakhonov, O.A. (2024). Analysis of Media and Information Literacy Definitions: A Qualitative Approach. Studies in Media and Communication , 12 (2), 116–129. https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6659
Dai, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Opinion Extremity Predicted by Media Exposure, Information Processing Mode, and Issue Sophistication About US–China Trade Dispute. International Journal of Communication , 17 , 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21294
Harbers, F., Banjac, S., & Eldridge II, S. (2024). Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Media Innovation and Change. Media and Communication , 12 , 1–8. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8152/3650
Hassan, MS, Mahbob, MH, Sah Allam, SN, Mustaffa, F., & Ibrahim, NAN (2022). Media literacy and young people's integrity in political participation: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Communication: Malaysian Journal of Communication , 38 (4), 355–373. https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/59660
Haugsgjerd, A., & Karlsen, R. (2022). Election Campaigns, News Consumption Gaps, and Social Media: Equalizing Political News Use When It Matters? The International Journal of Press/Politics , 29 (2), 507–529. https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/full/10.1177/19401612221112014?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=tc
Haugsgjerd, A., Karlsen, R., & Steen-Johnsen, K. (2023). Uninformed or misinformed in the digital news environment? How social media news use affects two dimensions of political knowledge. Political Communication , 40 (6), 700–718. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10584609.2023.2222070
Hidayat, H., & Muksin, NN (2023). Political Public Relations Ganjar Pranowo to Build Political Communication on Social Media. Proceedings of the University Research Colloquium , 39–58. http://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/2274
Hill, S. J., & Roberts, M. E. (2023). Acquiescence bias inflates estimates of conspiratorial beliefs and political misperceptions. Political Analysis , 31 (4), 575–590. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political- analysis/article/acquiescence-bias-inflates-estimates-of-conspiratorial-beliefs-and-political-misperceptions/36461392CC22A6AC6813767D64490A64
Huda, RI, Fauziah, N., Halimatussadiah, S., & Gumelar, RG (2022). Ganjar Pranowo's Political Communication of Empathy and Homophily. Madani Journal of Politics and Social Affairs , 14 (03), 472–483. http://www.e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/MADANI/article/view/3727
Jakob, J., Dobbrick, T., & Wessler, H. (2023). The integrative complexity of online user comments across different types of democracy and discussion arenas. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 28 (3), 580–600. https://journals-sagepub-com.translate.goog/doi/full/10.1177/19401612211044018?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=tc
Jun, TJ, & Firdaus, A. (2022). Social media political information dependency (SMPID): Theorizing news seeking in an age of sharing and posting. Journal of Media and Communication Research , 15 (1), 1–21. https://fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/social-media-political-information-dependency-smpid-theorising-news-seeking-in-an-age-of-sharing-and-posting-2/
Kang, K. K. (2024). Is Communication Visibility a Threat or an Opportunity? Social Media and Anonymous Social Support Organizations. International Journal of Communication , 18 , 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21192/4560
Manzilati, A. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods, Paradigms, Methods, and Applications . Brawijaya University Press.
Matthes, Jorg Nanz, Andreas Kaskeleviciute, Ruta Reiter, Franz Freiling, Isabelle Neureiter, Ariadne Stubenvoll, Marlis Sherrah, Sebastian E Juricek, Sarah Munzir, AA (2023). The Way We Use Social Media Matters: A Panel Study on Passive Versus Active Political Social Media Use and Affective Polarization. International Journal of Communication (19328036) , 17 . https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19015/4294
Mir, A. A. (2022). Pandemic Politics Through Social Media: A Study of India. J. Pol. Stud. , 29 (2), 1–12. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/pols/pdf-files/1-v29_2_2022.pdf
Nie, Kho Suet Zawawi, JW (2023). Systematic Review of Mediatization of Politics in Southeast Asia. Malaysian Journal of Communication , 39 (1), 294–308. https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/61970/13938
Pujihartati, Sri Hilmi Nurhaeni, Ismi Dwiastuti, Kartono, Drajat Tri, Demartoto, A. (2023). New Media and Green Behavior Campaign Through Corporate Social Responsibility Collaboration. Malaysian Journal of Communication , 39 (2), 325–337. https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/64776/14231
Raeisi-Varzaneh, M., Dakkak, O., Alaidaros, H., & Avci, İ. (2024). Internet of Things: Security, Issues, Threats, and Assessment of Different Cryptographic Technologies. Journal of Communications , 19 (2), 78–89. https://www.jocm.us/show-303-1972-1.html
Rakhmetov, B. (2022). The Internet's Influence on Society and Politics: Cyber Optimism and Cyber Pessimism. American Communication Journal , 24 (2), 1–10. https://www.ac-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Rakhmetov_Formatted_PDF-Version.pdf
Stolz, K. (2024). Dual polity, dual careers? The dynamic interaction of political careers and territorial order in the developing United Kingdom. Territory, Politics, Governance , 1–19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21622671.2023.2294797
Stromer-Galley, J., Wojcieszak, M., John, N., & Massanari, A. L. (2023). Introduction to the special issue of social media: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Communication , 73 (3), 193–197. https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/73/3/193/7189838?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
Tan, Y., & Chou, H.-Y. (2024). Image, issue, and affective priming effects of candidates' Facebook posts on voters' trait perceptions and overall evaluations. Asian Journal of Communication , 34 (1), 1–23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01292986.2023.2282426
Tatchou, C.N. (2022). The mediatization of politics in Cameroon: a political actor-centric approach. African Journalism Studies , 43 (1), 107–126. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23743670.2022.2044876
Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (2023). Metropolitan democracy from below: participation and rescaling in Delhi. Territory, Politics, Governance , 11 (2), 338–353. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21622671.2020.1837218
Thal, A. (2023). Do Political Elites Have Accurate Perceptions of Social Conditions? British Journal of Political Science , 53 (4), 1189–1207. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/abs/do-political-elites-have-accurate-perceptions-of-social-conditions/06DFAD98A8E9D9B7A4685BD0D9A53028
Varaine, S., Magni-Berton, R., Benslimane, I., & Crosetto, P. (2024). Egoism and altruism in intergroup conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution , 68 (2–3), 348–380. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00220027231164928
Wells, C., & Friedland, L. A. (2023). Recognition Crisis: Coming to terms with Identity, Attention and Political Communication in the Twenty-First Century. Political Communication , 40 (6), 681–699.
Yi, J. (2023). Engender tolerance and participation in polarized gender issues: the mediating role of discussion in cross-cutting exposure. Asian Journal of Communication , 33 (4), 369–389. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01292986.2023.2216720
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Studi Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal (comments to the editor can be added below).
