Public expectations towards the roles of the Indonesian house of representatives

  • Mohammad Hidayaturrahman
  • Edy Purwanto wiraraja university
  • Astriana Baiti Sinaga Muhammadiyah University Jakarta
  • Ahmad Hasan Ubaid Brawijaya University
  • Widya Desary Setia Wardhani Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Anak Agung Putu Sugiantiningsih STISPOL Wira Bhakti, Bali
Abstract views: 187 , PDF downloads: 60
Keywords: digital communication; house of representatives; legislative communication; political communication

Abstract

Abstract The People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI)  plays an important role in a democratic country, functioning as a means of control for the government in office. With its authority to make laws, set budgets, and supervise government administration, the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia has a strong position. This research was conducted to understand and analyse the public's perception of the DPR RI in its role. This research uses quantitative descriptive methods. Data was collected using questionnaires from respondents in 26 provinces, consisting of 71 cities and regencies in Indonesia from 2019 to 2022. This study discovered that most Indonesian people see a role for the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia and that they hope that the DPR will continue to work to create legislation and oversee the government. The existence of the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia is still of interest to the citizens of the Republic of Indonesia. So far, the ministry has only used mass media as a means of communication and political information. In the future, the parliament needs to use social media, as well as institutional websites, including video conferences and live streaming as a means of political communication in the era of digital democracy. To establish the groundwork, communication will not only be one-way but also two-way between parliament and the public, as well as between the public and parliament.

References

Aagaard, P. (2016). The fourth age of political communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication? Nordicum Mediterraneum, 11(3), 2–3. https://forskning.ruc.dk/en/publications/the-fourth-age-of-political-communication-democratic-decay-or-the

Abdiansyah, M. A., Ningrum, S., & Pancasilawan, R. (2020). Efektivitas Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Dalam Menghasilkan Undang-Undang Pada Tahun Sidang 2016 – 2017. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v3i1.23465

Aidulsyah, F., Margiansyah, D., Kurniawan, F. E., Dwiyanti Kusumaningrum, K. S., & Aini, Y. N. (2020). Peta Pebisnis di Parlemen: Potret Oligarki di Indonesia (01; Issue 01). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31169.17765

Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Populism Against Europe in Social Media: The Eurosceptic Discourse on Twitter in Spain, Italy, France, and United Kingdom During the Campaign of the 2019 European Parliament Election. Sec. Media Governance and the Public Sphere, 5, 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00054

Auel, K., Eisele, O., & Kinski, L. (2018). What Happens in Parliament Stays in Parliament? Newspaper Coverage of National Parliaments in EU Affairs. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(3), 628–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12685

Azed, A. B. (2014). Menyoroti Kinerja Legislasi DPR. Legalitas, VI(1), 1–31.

Bailer, S. (2011). People’s voice or information pool? the role of, and reasons for, parliamentary questions in the swiss parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595123

Ben-Porat, C. S., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. (2020). Electoral system influence on social network usage patterns of parliamentary assistants as their legislators’ stand-in: The United States, Germany, and Israel. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820906553

Biro Pemberitaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2020). Ikhtisar Berita Hasil Analisis Media: Vol. 30 Desembe.

Campos-Domínguez, E., & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2021). Parliaments and Key Transformations in Digital Communication. In Digital Political Communication Strategies (pp. 25–26). The Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81568-4_2

Crum, B., & Oleart, A. (2023). Information or Accountability? A Research Agenda on European Commissioners in National Parliaments. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(3), 853–854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13399

Dahlberg, L. (2005). The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously? Theory and Society, 34, 111–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-0155-z

Dipboye, R. L., & Foster, J. B. (2002). Multi-level theorizing about perceptions of organizational politics (F. Yammarino, F.J. and Dansereau, Ed.; pp. 255–270). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(02)01035-4

Dommett, K., & Verovšek, P. J. (2021). Promoting Democracy in the Digital Public Sphere: Applying Theoretical Ideals to Online Political Communication. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 28(4), 358–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1955206

Duell, D., Kaftan, L., Proksch, S.-O., Slapin, J., & Wratil, C. (2023). Communicating the Rift: Voter Perceptions of Intraparty Dissent in Parliaments. The Journal of Politics, 85(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/720645

Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions (F. Yammarino, F.J. and Dansereau, Ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(02)01034-2

Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management (IJM), 18(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800107

Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies, 63(December 2019), 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111

Foundethakis, P. (2003). The Hellenic Parliament: The new rules of the game. Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233032000250644

Gava, R., Varone, F., Mach, A., Eichenberger, S., Christe, J., & Chao-Blanco, C. (2017). Interests groups in Parliament: Exploring MPs’ interest affiliations (2000-2011). Swiss Political Science Review, 23(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12224

Gestrich, A. (2006). The Public Sphere and the Habermas Debate. German History, 24(3), 413–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/0266355406gh381oa

Gilardi, F., Gessleram Theresa, Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social Media and Political Agenda Setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390

Habermas, J. (1990). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article. In Critical Theory and Society (1st ed., pp. 6–7). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003059509-13/public-sphere-encyclopedia-article-j%C3%BCrgen-habermas

Harmonis;, Purnamasawi;, & Adawiyah. (2014). Persepsi publik terhadap peran dan fungsi anggota DPR RI tahun 2009-2014. Komunikasi, 434–445.

Hendriks, C. M., & Kay, A. (2019). From ‘Opening Up’ to Democratic Renewal: Deepening Public Engagement in Legislative Committees. Government and Opposition, 54(1), 25–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.20

Hillman, B. (2018). The Limits of Gender Quotas: Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1368092

Hochwarter, W. A., Rosen, C. C., Jordan, S. L., Ferris, G. R., & Maher, L. P. (2020). Perceptions of Organizational Politics Research : Past , Present , and Future. Journal of Management, XX(X), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319898506

Jalal, A. (2020). Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia: Studi Perilaku Anggota Dalam Melaksanakan Kekuasaan. Ilmu Dan Budaya, 41(68), 7989–8006. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.47313/jib.v41i68.875

Jamil, A., & Eriyanto, E. (2021). Social media communication: content analysis of Indonesian parliament instagram account. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 5(3), 746–747. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i3.3807

Judge, D., & Leston-Bandeira, C. (2017). The Institutional Representation of Parliament. Political Studies, 66(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717706901

Kanapyanov, T. (2018). Role and place of the parliament of Kazakhstan in the system of checks and balances. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.01.007

Kaplan, D. (2023). When a Club Turns into a Public Event: The Structural Transformation of the British Parliament and the Making of Collective Solidarity. Society, 60, 881–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00897-y

Kinski, L. (2020). What role for national parliaments in EU governance? A view by members of parliament. Journal of European Integration, 00(00), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1817000

Kjekshus, H. (1974). Parliament in a One-Party State—the Bunge of Tanzania, 1965–70. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 12(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00008958

Larasati, A., Jamil, A., & Briandana, R. (2021). Communication Strategies in Providing Good Government Education Through Social Media: A Case Study at the Parliament of the Republic of Indonesia. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 722–723. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3791898

Lay, C. (2017a). Political linkages between CSOs and parliament in Indonesia: a case study of political linkages in drafting the Aceh Governance Law. Asian Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2017.1297243

Lay, C. (2017b). The Emerging of New Democratic Space: CSOs and Parliament in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. PCD Journal, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.26286

Lord, C. (2018). The European Parliament: a working parliament without a public? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 34–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444624

Meganck, S., Guidry, J., Messner, M., & Medina-Messner, V. (2019). @JunckerEU vs. @MartinSchulz: How leading candidates in the 2014 European Parliament elections campaigned on Twitter. First Monday, 24(11), 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i11.9856

Mietzner, M. (2017). Indonesia in 2016: Jokowi’s Presidency between Elite Consolidation and Extra-Parliamentary Opposition. Asian Survey, 57(1), 165–172.

Mukhortov, D. S., & Zhovner, E. A. (2023). Linking Word Use and Personality Characteristics: A Contrastive Study into Parliamentary Communications of Labour Leaders Jeremy Corbyn and Keir Starmer. Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-1-53-69

Nemţoi, G. (2014). The Decisive Role of Parliaments in Democracy of Social-political Life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.242

Oquendo, Á. R. (2002). Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(2), 189–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.2.189

Pfetsch, B., Benert, V., & Schieferdecker, D. (2023). Ever More Dynamic, Complex, and Transnational: Comparing Political Communication Under the Conditions of Digital Environments and Disrupted Democracy. In Streamlining Political Communication Concepts (pp. 23–24). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45335-9_3

Prihatini, E. S. (2018). Indonesian young voters: Political knowledge and electing women into parliament. Women’s Studies International Forum, 70, 46–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.015

Prihatini, E. S. (2019). Women’s views and experiences of accessing National Parliament: Evidence from Indonesia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 74(December 2018), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.001

Putra, D. R., & Riwanto, A. (2018). Analisis peranan badan legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia dalam penyusunan Undang-Undang. Res Publica, 2(1), 28–42.

Raunio, T. (1996). Parliamentary questions in the European parliament: Representation, information and control. Journal of Legislative Studies, 2(4), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339608420492

Riana, S. E. (2018). Konsep Diri Anggota Dewan Perempuan DPR RI (Studi Interaksionisme Simbolik Tentang Konsep Diri Anggota Dewan Perempuan DPR RI Dari Kalangan Selebritas Periode 2014-2019). Universitas Bhayangkara.

Richardson, A., & Sheinberg, D. (2008). Promoting Inclusive Parliaments: The representation of minorities and indigenous peoples in parliament.

Rittberger, B. (2012). Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(SUPPL.1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x

Rivera, M. (2018). Growth in parliament: Some notes on the persistence of a dogma. Futures, 95(September 2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.002

Rudkowsky, E., Haselmayer, M., Wastian, M., Jenny, M., Emrich, Š., & Sedlmair, M. (2018). More than Bags of Words: Sentiment Analysis with Word Embeddings. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1455817

Salahodjaev, R. (2020). Women in parliament and deforestation: cross-country evidence. Journal for Nature Conservation, 125830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125830

Shukralla, E. K., & Allan, W. J. (2011). Foreign aid, women in parliament and corruption: Empirical evidence from the 2000s. Economics Bulletin, 31(1), 519–533.

Solihah, R. (2016). Pola Relasi Bisnis Dan Politik Di Indonesia Masa Reformasi: Kasus Rent Seeking. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 1(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v1i1.10546

Soontjens, K., & Sevenans, J. (2022). Electoral incentives make politicians respond to voter preferences: Evidence from a survey experiment with members of Parliament in Belgium. Social Science Quarterly, 103(5), 1125–1126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13186

Stockemer, D. (2011). Women ’ s Parliamentary Representation in Africa : The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x

Törnquist, O. (2019). Many Votes, Little Voice: Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections. Pacific Affairs, 92(3), 459–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5509/2019923459

Waterhouse, S. J. (2015). People’s Parliament? An assessment of public participation in South Africa’s legislatures. University of Cape Town.

Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095

Published
2024-03-29
How to Cite
Hidayaturrahman, M., Purwanto, E., Sinaga, A., Ubaid, A., Wardhani, W., & Sugiantiningsih, A. (2024). Public expectations towards the roles of the Indonesian house of representatives. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 8(1), 183 - 194. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v8i1.7432
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)