Expressing national identity: national issues from the Indonesian Muslim diaspora

  • Tati Hartimah Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta
  • Nina Farlina Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta
  • Setyadi Sulaiman Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta
  • Endi Aulia Garadian Northern Illinois University
Abstract views: 52 , PDF downloads: 44
Keywords: democracy, identity discourse, Indonesian diaspora, nationalism, social media

Abstract

Abstract  This study analysed how Indonesian Muslim diasporas utilise social media to express their national identity. This research employed a qualitative approach, utilising the symbolic interaction theory of G.H. Mead and virtual ethnographic analysis to examine the Indonesian Muslim diaspora's activity on Twitter (now known as X) to maintain an intense connection with Indonesian public discourse through actively posting their notion on the platform. The research discovered that several Indonesian Muslim diasporas who are active on Twitter have experienced intimidation because of their tweets. Twitter, which should be a free space to express opinions, has become a space of judgment. Tweets that criticise social, political, economic and religious issues affect their lives; they are threatened, intimidated, and dehumanised in various ways, and their space is restricted. Not only on national issues but intimidation also applies when they respond to international issues, such as the Palestine conflict. Their activism in tweeting about Palestine resulted in the termination of their work contracts and ostracisation in academic circles in Europe. This research shows the critical role of Twitter as a medium for disseminating national ideas and ideas that strengthen the national identity of the Indonesian Muslim diaspora. They leverage social media for digital activism, shaping national identity, democracy, and governance. Their participation extends beyond discourse into transnational political engagement, where they construct counter-public and intersectional narratives that challenge dominant perspectives. Through these digital spaces, they contribute alternative viewpoints on socio-political issues, influencing both national and international discussions.

References

Abdul Reda, Amir, Semuhi Sinanoglu, and Mohamed Abdalla. (2024). "Mobilizing the masses: measuring resource mobilization on Twitter." Sociological Methods & Research 53, No. 1: 153-192.

Ahyar, M., & Alfitri, A. (2019). Aksi Bela Islam: Islamic Clicktivism and the New Authority of Religious Propaganda in the Millennial Age in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v9i1.1-29

Aksan, N., Kısac, B., Aydın, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic Interaction Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160

Alinejad, D., & Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Migrancy and Digital Mediations of Emotion. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(5), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920933649

Anderson, B. R. O. (1992). Long-distance Nationalism: World Capitalism and the Rise of Identity Politics. Centre for Asian Studies Amsterdam.

Anderson, B. R. O. (1994). Exodus. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/448713

Srisai, Arissara P. (2025). The Role of Social Media in Political Mobilization Among Youth in Thailand: Case Study of the 2020 Thai Protests. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 4(1), 34–37. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/view/1173

Aziz, Abdul. (2024). Rohingya diaspora online: Mapping the spaces of visibility, resistance and transnational identity on social media. New Media & Society 26, No.9:5219-5239. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614448221132241

Bolat, Nursel, Ömer Çakın, and Esennur Sirer. (2024). Study on Understanding the Changing Diaspora and Virtual Communities through Digitalization. Quaestio Rossica. Т. 12. No.1: 110-128. DOI 10.15826/qr.2024.1.868; https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130176

Candidatu, Laura, and Sandra Ponzanesi. (2022). Digital diasporas: Staying with the trouble. Communication, Culture and Critique 15, No. 2: 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcac010.

Cooper, Kylie. (2023). The effectiveness of online activism: Who it is effective for, what issues it is effective for, and what time period it is effective for. Political Science. 42. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_pos/42

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Crenshaw, K. (2019). On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. The New Press.

Cunningham, S. (2001). Popular Media as Public ‘Sphericules’ for Diasporic Communities. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400201

de Gaulle, Ondine (2025) 'Podcasts and Digital Diasporic Identities: A Case Study of Iranian Diasporas.' The SOAS Journal of Postgraduate Research, 16. pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00043307

Denisova, A. (2019). Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469404

Dinh, T. C. T., & Lee, Y. (2021). “I Want to Be as Trendy as Influencers” – How “Fear of Missing Out” Leads to Buying Intention for Products Endorsed by Social Media Influencers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0127

Dinh, T., Kopf, K., & Seitz, B. (2017). The Power of Social Media – Shareholder Activism via Twitter and a Firm’s Market Value. Die Unternehmung, 71(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2017-1-50

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240

Fraser, N. (2014). Transnationalizing the Public Sphere. John Wiley & Sons.

George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From Clicktivism to Hacktivism: Understanding Digital Activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.001

Georgiou, M. (2010). Identity, Space and the Media: Thinking through Diaspora. Revue Européenne Des Migrations Internationales, 26(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.5028

Georgiou, M. (2013). Diaspora in the Digital Era: Minorities and Media Representation. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 12(4), 80–99.

Gitlin, T. (2003). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press.

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (5th or later Edition). MIT Press.

Hine, C. (2020). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003085348

Husin, S. S., Rahman, A. A. A., & Mukhtar, D. (2021). The Symbolic Interactionism Theory: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences, 4(17), Article 17.

Kadhim, M. J. (2024). Social Networks' Place in Contemporary Political Movements. International Journal of Social Trends, 2(2), 51-59.

Latif, J. (2018). Muslim American Cyber Contestations between Scholars and Activists Debating Racism, Islamophobia and Black Lives Matter. 7(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888099-00701005

Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077

Lee, K. (2015). When Big Brother Uses Twitter, Too: Productive Forms of Policing and the Role of Media in the Seoul G20 Protests in South Korea: When Big Brother Uses Twitter, Too. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(3), 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12087

Lim, M. (2013). Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386

Lim, M. (2023). From Activist Media to Algorithmic Politics: The Internet, social media, and civil society in Southeast Asia. In E. Hansson & M. L. Weiss (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Civil and Uncivil Society in Southeast Asia (pp. 25–44). Routledge.

Majeed, T., & Abushbak, A. M. (2024). Politics of phygital protests: Palestinian# GreatMarchofReturn discourse on Twitter. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00072_1

Maigari, Muhammad Abdullahi, and Kamselem Shehu. (2025). Diasporic Participation In Homeland Democratic Processes: Democracy Beyond Border In The Internet Era. Journal of Religion and Local Politics 1, no. 1: 1-19.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self & Society. University of Chicago Press.

Naithani, Arunima, and Devam Thapa (2024). "Digital Activism: Political Mobilisation of Youth in Uttarakhand, North India." In Cultures of Learning, pp. 202-221. Routledge India.

Neog, Krishanu Bhargav. (2024). "Memes, National Identity and National Belonging: Visual “Nation-Talk” on Indian Social Media Pages." Television & New Media 25, No. 2: 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231180496

Nyangulu, D., & Sharra, A. (2023). Agency and Incentives of Diasporic Political Influencers on Facebook Malawi. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 20563051231177936. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177936

Orsini, Alessandro. (2024). "Symbolic Interactionism." In Sociological Theory: From Comte to Postcolonialism, pp. 435-484. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland

Özturan, P., & Grinstein, A. (2022). Impact of Global Brand Chief Marketing Officers’ Corporate Social Responsibility and Sociopolitical Activism Communication on Twitter. Journal of International Marketing, 30(3), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X221104077

Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital Diasporas: Postcoloniality, Media and Affect. Interventions, 22(8), 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1718537

Riswati, R. (2021). Implementasi Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Berbasis Digitalisasi Teknologi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v3i2.2474

Sahu, M. K., & Gupta, T. C. (2024). Social Media and Political Activism in India: A Content Analysis of Online Movements. Economic Sciences, 20(2), 35-46.

Swandari, A., Satwika, C., & Harsulistyati, L. (2019). KPK Berdiri untuk Negeri. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. //catalog.umj.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D66303

Udoudom, U., Bassey, B., George, K., & Etifit, S. (2024). Impact of Symbolic Interactionism, Pragmatism and Social Constructionism on Communication and Media Practice. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-25.

Xinjian, W., & Yao, Z. (2024). Symbolic Interactionism. In The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 1-2). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Published
2025-03-25
How to Cite
Hartimah, T., Farlina, N., Sulaiman, S., & Garadian, E. A. (2025). Expressing national identity: national issues from the Indonesian Muslim diaspora. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 9(1), 041-053. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v9i1.9385
Section
Articles