Pulang kampung: communication technology network

Abstract views: 1146 , PDF downloads: 528
Revisions Form downloads: 0
Statement Originality downloads: 0
Keywords: communication network, communication technology, cellular phone, kinship


Pulang Kampung, popularly known as mudik bareng, is the activity or event of boro people. It means going back to their village. The activity allows many people to meet and gather with parents, extended families, and neighbours who have also travelled from their village and worked diversely at the migrant regions. This study focused on how one of the boro communities from Pule village at Jakarta mobilise their group members to the program using communication technology of cellular phone. This study applied the community mobilisation and coordination concepts which lead to the communication network model. The network model was analysed by density, centrality, and eigenvalue of social network analysis to depict the coordination and mobilisation map of communication technology network of cellular phone among the group member of boro community. In addition, the network was explored and discussed with types of kinship and community leadership.

Author Biography

Irwansyah, Universitas Indonesia

Senior Lecturer and Researcher at Communication Department Universitas Indonesia


Abraham, A. (2012). Computational social networks: Mining and visualization. In Computational Social Networks: Mining and Visualization (Vol. 9781447140). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4054-2

Blanc, C. S. (1996). Balikbayan: A Filipino Extension of the National Imaginary and of State Boundaries. Philippine Sociological Review, 44(1/4), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/41853680

Bora, A. (2012). Media as a Catalyst for Higher Education. New Media and Mass Communication, 2(0), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.7176/NMMC.VOL260-66

Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009, February 13). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, Vol. 323, pp. 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821

Campbell, S. W., & Kelley, M. J. (2006, May). Mobile phone use in AA networks: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 34, pp. 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600574104

Dougherty, E. (n.d.). Mobilizing a revolution: How cellphones are transforming public health. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/magazine/mobilizing-a-revolution/

Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2011). Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 18. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1242

Emery, T. (n.d.). Cell phone most hated, needed innovation. Retrieved from Bizreport website: http://www.bizreport.com/article.php?art_id=5980

Fox, K. (2006). Society: The New garden fence. The Mobile Life Report 2006, pp. 12–25. Retrieved from http://iis.yougov.co.uk/extranets/ygarchives/content/pdf/CPW060101004_1.pdf

Freeman, L. C. (1989). Network representations. In Research methods in social network analysis (pp. 11–40). Fairfax: George Mason University Press.

Goodwin, P. D., & Wenzel, J. W. (1979). Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study in socio-logic. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637909383480

Green, N. (2003). Community redefined: privacy and accountabilityo Title. In Mobile communication : essays on cognition and community (pp. 43–56). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.

Haddon, L. (2006). Information and communication technologies in everyday life : a concise introduction and research guide. Oxford: Berg.

Haryono, T. J. S. (1999). Jaringan sosial migran sirkuler: studi pada migran sirkuler asal desa Kepatihan Kecamatan Selogiri Kabupaten Wonogiri yang bermigrasi ke Jakarta. Universitas Indonesia.

Irwansyah. (2010). Communication technology as an extension of kinship. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Ito, M. (2005). Mobile phones, Japanese youth, and the re-placement of social contact. In Mobile Communications : Re-Negotiation of the Social Sphere. London: Springer London.

Jones, S. (2004). Canada and the Globalized Immigrant. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(10), 1263–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204264254

Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (2006). Perpetual contact : mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koentjaraningrat. (1961). Review of: Hildred Geertz, The Javanese family; A study of kinship and socialization. American Antrhopologist, 872–874.

Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (2002). Structure, culture and simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Social Networks, 24(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00008-4

Layne, J. E., Sampson, S. E., Mallio, C. J., Hibberd, P. L., Griffith, J. L., Das, S. K., … Castaneda-Sceppa, C. (2008). Successful dissemination of a community-based strength training program for older adults by peer and professional leaders: The people exercising program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(12), 2323–2329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02010.x

Lee, K. (n.d.). Balik Kampung. Retrieved from www.kenleewrites.com website: http://www.kenleewrites.com/2010/03/balik-kampung.html

Lewis, D. K. (1998). Kinship, self-concept, and self-identity: Roles in racial identity, spirituality, and psychopathology in African-American and Caucasian-American Women. Virginia.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications Inc.

Ling, R. S. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.

Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2006). Hyper-coordination via mobile telephones in Norway. In Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maksum, I. Ri. (2009). Mengelola megapolitan Jakarta: Quo vadis? Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 13(1), 13–18.

Nadeau, E. G. (2010). The first mile: the potential for community-based health cooperation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved from University of Wisconsin website: http://www.uwcc.wisc.edu/pdf/Staff Papers/Community-Based Health Cooperatives.pdf

Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601

Panda, M., Abraham, A., Dehuri, S., & Patra, M. R. (2012). Performance Evaluation of Social Network Using Data Mining Techniques. In Social Network: Mining and Visualizato (pp. 25–50). London: Springer Science and Business Media.

Picot, A. (2016). Understandings of biological kinship ties in social workers’ accounts: A cross-cultural study of out-of-home placements in Norway and France. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 15(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015586247

Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. London: Sage Publications.

Qanitat, F. (2012). Pulang Kampung Bareng siap angkut 77.428 penumpang. Retrieved from www.bisnis.com website: http://www.bisnis.com/articles/Pulang Kampung-bareng-siap-angkut-77-dot-428-penumpang

Rahyono, F. X. (2011). The concept of fairness as expressed in Javanese propositions: A study of cultural wisdom. Makara Sosial Humaniora, 21–28.

Schnettler, S., & Steinbach, A. (2011). How do biological and social kinship play out within families in the U . S .? An evolutionary perspective on perceived parental care and closeness. Journal of Family Research, 173–195.

Schultz-Jones, B. (2007). The Intersection of Social Networks in Public Service Model: A Case Study. University of North Texas.

Scott, J. (2000). Social network Analysis: A handbook 2nd edition. London: Sage.

Simmel, G. (1964). The web of group-affiliations. New York: Free Press.

Srivastava, L. (2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour. Behaviour and Information Technology, 24(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290512331321910

St-Pierre, D. (2010). Resource mobilization: a practical guide for research and community-based organizations 2nd edition. Manila: Venture for Fund Raising.

Stein, M., & Verclas, K. (n.d.). Cellphones for civic engagement strategy guide. Retrieved from Mobile Active website: http://mobileactive.org/files/MobileActiveGuide1_0.pdf

Taylor, A. S., & Harper, R. (2003). The gift of the gab?: A design oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025091532662

Uy-Tioco, C. S., & Cabalquinto, E. C. B. (2020). Transnational Mobile Carework: Filipino Migrants, Family Intimacy, and Mobile Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1790-6_10

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. London: Cambridge University Press.

Wete, F. N. (1988). Mass communication and development: impact depends on strategies. Africa Media Review, 3(1), 34–45.

White, P. B., & White, N. R. (2008). Maintaining co-presence: Tourists and mobile communication in New Zealand. In Handbook of mobile communications (pp. 195–207). Massachusetts: MIT Press.

World Bank. (2012). Information and Communications for Development 2012 : Maximizing mobile. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8991-1
How to Cite
Irwansyah. (2020). Pulang kampung: communication technology network. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 4(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i1.2238