Climate change awareness of gen z: the influence of frame and jargon on online news

  • Angga Ariestya Charles University
  • Gracia Paramitha LSPR Communication and Business Institute Jakarta
  • Maria Advenita Gita Elmada Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Abstract views: 1393 , PDF downloads: 879
Keywords: Climate change, youth, frame, jargon, online media

Abstract

This study seeks to know how climate change frames and jargon in online news influence Gen Z’s awareness. It is important since only a few studies on climate change communication focus on Gen Z. The research took the quantitative within-subject experimental method to college students as participants (N=110). Participants were divided into an experimental and control group and manipulated by customised online news containing frames and jargon about climate change. The finding is that the climate change frame on the online news influences Gen Z’s awareness, while jargon does not. The awareness is higher when Gen-Z was given an uncertainty-risk frame than an economic cost-benefit frame. Despite Gen Z being aware of climate change, a correlation between cognitive and conative awareness is arguably low. The internal factor (less role model) and external factor (less policy involvement) could be the factors of low conative awareness.

References

Albert, M., Hurrelmann, K., & Quenzel, G. (2010). Jugend 2010- Eine pragmatische Generation behauptet sich [Youth 2010: A Pragmatic Generation Asserts Itself]. In Shell Jugendstudie.

Ariestya, A. (2018). Efek Bingkai Berita Online Terhadap Penilaian Heuristik Individu. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v5i2.8297

Ariestya, A. (2019). Framing Effects of Online News Survey Results on Individual Heuristics. Jurnal Komunikasi ISKI.

Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., & Wolling, J. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386741

Aswani, R., Ghrera, S. P., Kar, A. K., & Chandra, S. (2017). Identifying buzz in social media: a hybrid approach using artificial bee colony and k-nearest neighbors for outlier detection. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-017-0461-2

Barrón, N. G., Gruber, S., & Huffman, G. (2022). Student Engagement and Environmental Awareness: Gen Z and Ecocomposition. Environmental Humanities, 14(1), 219-232.

Basu, R. (2022). Green Six Sigma: A Lean Approach to Sustainable Climate Change Initiatives. John Wiley & Sons.

Baxter, Leslie A. & Babbie, E. (2018). The Basic of Communication Research. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Bruine de Bruin, W., Rabinovich, L., Weber, K., Babboni, M., Dean, M., & Ignon, L. (2021). Public understanding of climate change terminology. Climatic Change, 167(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03183-0

Copsey, T, Dalimunthe, S, Hoijtink, L, and Stoll, N. (2013). How the people of Indonesia live with climate change and what communication can do. https://www.bbc.co.uk/climateasia

Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research and Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Thousand Oaks California.

Dauda, S., & Nik Hasan, N. N. (2018). Framing the sustainable development goals in Malaysian online news. SEARCH (Malaysia), 10(1).

Davis, J. J. (1995). The Effects of Message Framing on Response to Environmental Communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203

De Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., & Ellemers, N. (2016). Perceptions of Manipulation and Judgments of Illegitimacy: Pitfalls in the Use of Emphasis Framing when Communicating about CO 2 Capture and Storage. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1047884

Dumitrica, D., & Felt, M. (2020). Mediated grassroots collective action: negotiating barriers of digital activism. Information Communication and Society, 23(13). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1618891

Elmada, M. A. G., Ariestya, A., Lestari, C. I., Lolita, T. L. V., & Widjono, R. A. (2020). Enhance The Awareness Of Food Waste Management Through The Digital World. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Dan Corporate Social Responsibility (PKM-CSR), 3, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.37695/pkmcsr.v3i0.794

Field, A., & Hole, G. (2003). How to Design and Report Experiments. SAGE Publication.

Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Rivenes, V. (2016). Young Norwegians and their views on climate change and the future: findings from a climate concerned and oil-rich nation. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(8), 1128–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1145633

Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (2012). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. In Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601360

Ham, M., Horvat, M., & Mrčela, D. (2016). Insights for Measuring. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 1, 159–176.

Jaskulsky, L., & Besel, R. (2013). Words That (Don’t) Matter: An Exploratory Study of Four Climate Change Names in Environmental Discourse. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 12(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2013.795836

Kahn, M. E., & Kotchen, M. J. (2011). Business Cycle Effects on Concern about Climate Change: The Chilling Effect of Recession. Climate Change Economics. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007811000292

Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’10, 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., & Marlon, J. (2013). Climate Change in the American Mind. Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in November 2013. In Yale University and George Mason University.

Luthfia, A. R., & Alkhajar, E. N. S. (2018). Strengthening public awareness on climate change: Lesson learned from a youth social movement in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/200/1/012033

MacKenzie, J., McGuire, R., & Hartwell, S. (2014). The First Generation of the Twenty-First Century. 1–18. http://magid.com/sites/default/files/pdf/MagidPluralistGenerationWhitepaper.pdf

Murthy, D. (2015). Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz? Information Communication and Society, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1006659

Narksompong, J., & Limjirakan, S. (2015). Youth Participation in Climate Change for Sustainable Engagement. In Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12121

O’brien, K., Selboe, E., & Hayward, B. M. (2018). Exploring youth activism on climate change: Dutiful, disruptive, and dangerous dissent. Ecology and Society, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10287-230342

Ødegard, G., & Berglund, F. (2008). Political participation in late modernity among Norwegian youth: An individual choice or a statement of social class? Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802247573

Ojala, M. (2012a). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

Ojala, M. (2012b). Regulating worry, promoting hope: How do children, adolescents, and young adults cope with climate change? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.

Ojala, M. (2013). Coping with climate change among adolescents: Implications for subjective well-being and environmental engagement. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052191

Pacoma, M. A. (2019). Environmental realities: Evaluating climate change coverage of Philippine online news media. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 3(1), 1-26.

Pandve, H. T., Deshmukh, P. R., Pandve, R. T., & Patil, N. R. (2009). Role of youth in combating climate change. In Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.55130

Parker, L., Prabawa-Sear, K., & Kustiningsih, W. (2018). How Young People in Indonesia see themselves as Environmentalists. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(136). https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1496630

Parzonko, A. J., Balińska, A., & Sieczko, A. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviors of generation z in the context of the concept of Homo Socio-Oeconomicus. Energies, 14(6), 1597.

Popescu, A. M., & Pennacchiotti, M. (2010). Detecting controversial events from Twitter. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871751

Roziqin, A., Sumiarto, R. S., & Aziz, F. N. (2021). Mental Revolution, Youth, and Environmental Issues in Indonesia. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(11), 1191-1201.

Sanson, A. V., & Burke, S. E. L. (2020). Climate Change and Children: An Issue of Intergenerational Justice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22176-8_21

Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2006). Empowered for Action? How Do Young People Relate to Environmental Challenges? In Beyond Cartesian Dualism. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_5

Schuldt, J. P. (2016). “Global Warming” versus “Climate Change” and the Influence of Labeling on Public Perceptions. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (Issue November 2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.309

Schuldt, J. P., Konrath, S. H., & Schwarz, N. (2011). “Global warming” or “climate change”? Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq073

Schuldt, J. P., & Roh, S. (2014). Media frames and cognitive accessibility: What do “global warming” and “climate change” evoke in partisan minds? Environmental Communication, 8(4), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.909510

Schuldt, J. P., Roh, S., & Schwarz, N. (2015). Questionnaire Design Effects in Climate Change Surveys: Implications for the Partisan Divide. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555066

Sladek, S., & Miller, J. (2018). Ready or Not, Here Comes Z. In xyzuniversity. https://www.xyzuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Ready-or-Not-Here-Comes-Z-Final.pdf

Stecula, D. A., & Merkley, E. (2019). Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014. Frontiers in Communication, 4(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006

Sulistyawati, S., Mulasari, S. A., & Sukesi, T. W. (2018). Assessment of knowledge regarding climate change and health among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9716831

Tranter, B., & Skrbis, Z. (2014). Political and social divisions over climate change among young Queenslanders. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46285

Vegh, S. (2013). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyber protests against the world bank. In Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203954317-9

Villar, A., & Krosnick, J. A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change, 105(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9882-x

Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.” Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506073088

Published
2022-11-10
How to Cite
Ariestya, A., Paramitha, G., & Elmada, M. A. G. (2022). Climate change awareness of gen z: the influence of frame and jargon on online news. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 6(3), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i3.5287
Section
Articles