Discourse on Corruption from an Administrative Law Perspective
Abstract views: 127
,
PDF downloads: 108
Abstract
Corruption is implicitly defined as the unlawful misuse of authority, position, or trust to obtain personal gain or benefit from certain groups that may harm the public interest and may harm the public interest. The criminal offense of corruption in its various forms includes extortion, bribery, and gratuities, which have occurred for a long time with perpetrators ranging from state officials to corruption offenses in various forms include extortion, bribery, and gratuities, which have occurred for a long time with perpetrators ranging from state officials to the lowest from state officials to the lowest employees. Corruption essentially starts with a habit, which is not realized by every apparatus. That every official does not realize, starting from the habit of receiving tribute, gifts, bribes, the provision of certain facilities or others, and in the end. Corruption begins with actions that violate accountability. Accountability. Official accountability is embodied in the principle of accountability. Research This research refers to the normative research method, with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. Statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. This concludes that the criminal offense of corruption is certainly related to administrative law in the context of abuse of authority over the position held.
References
BOOK
Anwar, Syamsul, Fikih Antikorupsi Perspektif Ulama Muhammadiyah Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid PP Muhammadiyah (Jakarta: Pusat studi Agama dan Peradaban (PSAP), 2006).
Brouwer JG dan Schilder, A Survey of Dutch Administratif Law (Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, 1998).
Eny Suastuti, Konsep Kerugian Dalam Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Persero Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 2009) [unpublished].
HD Van Wijk, Hoofdstukken van Administratief Recht (Utrecht: Uitvegerij Lemma BV, 1995).
Hadjon, Philipus M & Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2012).
Henry Campbell Black, MA, Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co, 1968).
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Memahami Untuk Membasmi; Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, 2006).
Lilik Mulyadi, Titik Singgung Mengadili Menyalahgunakan Kewenangan Pada Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Kencana, 2023).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2005).
Muhammad Azhar, Pendidikan Antikorupsi (Yogyakarta: LP3 UMY Partnership, 2003).
Pope, Jeremy, Strategi Memberantas Korupsi; Elemen Sistem Integritas Nasional, (terj.) Masri Maris (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2003).
Ridwan Nasir, Dialektika Islam dengan Problem Kontemporer (Surabaya: IAIN Sunan Ampel Press, 2006).
Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, et-al, Hukum Administrasi Sebuah Bunga Rampai (Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2020).
William Wade, Administrative Law (US, Eight: Oxford University Press, 2000).
JOURNAL
Abidin, Achmad Anwar, “Pembentukan Karakter Siswa Melalui Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Anti Korupsi” (2017) 1:2 JALIE J Appl Linguist Islam Educ 363–364.
Adam Setiawan dan Nehru Asyikin, “Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Dan Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Dalam Penggunaan Diskresi Sebagai Instrumen Pelayanan Publik (Public Service)” (2020) 32:1 Mimb Huk 83–84.
Aled Williams, “Corruption Definitions And Their Implications For Targeting Natural Resource Corruption” (2021) Target Nat Resour Corrupt 2.
Anggraini, Novia Salfat & Hernadi Affandi, “Dismissal of Acting Provincial Heads in Indonesia Based on the Transparency Principle Perspective” (2024) 8:1 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 61–69.
Chandra Ayu Astuti & Anis Chariri, “Penentuan Kerugian Keuangan Negara yang Dilakukan Oleh BPK dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2015) 4:3 Diponegoro J Account 4.
Kautsar, Imaduddin & Najwa Aslami, “Dugaan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Impor Gula: Analisis Celah Pelanggaran Wewenang Menteri Perdagangan” (2024) LK2 FH UI, online: <https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/portfolio/dugaan-kasus-tindak-pidana-korupsi-impor-gula-analisis-celah-pelanggaran-wewenang-menteri-perdagangan/>.
Nur Basuki Minarno, “Pembuktian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2007) 12:1 Perspektif 46.
Rampadio, Hamdan, Ana Fauzia & Fathul Hamdani, “The urgency of arrangement regarding illicit enrichment in Indonesia in order to eradication of corruption crimes by corporations” (2022) 9:2 J Pembaharuan Huk 225–241.
Raspati, Taufik Rachman dan Lucky, “Menakar Makna Merugikan Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-UndangTipikor” (2021) 4:2 Nagari Law Rev 229.
Roesnajanti, Enni, “Penerapan Azas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 1454 K/PID.SUS/2011 dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lamongan No. 262/PID.SUS/2017/PN LMG)” (2021) 4:2 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 211–233.
Serbabagus, S, “Unsur Dapat Merugikan Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara pada Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2017) 1:1 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 113–138.
WEBSITE
Eva Mazrieva, “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Turun ke Peringkat 90”, (2017), online: Voaindonesia.com.
Philipus M Hadjon, Discretionary Power dan Asas Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB), by Philipus M Hadjon (Semarang, 2004).
Copyright (c) 2025 Lanny Ramli, Muklis Alanam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
