The Effect of The Board of Commissioners Structure on Dividend Policy : Study of The Non-Financial Family Firm in Indonesia Period 2017-2020

  • Ayu Pita Winarti Lampung University
  • Ernie Hendrawaty Lampung University
  • R.A Fiska Huzaimah Lampung University
Abstract views: 195 , PDF Journal downloads: 141
Keywords: family ownership, non-financial, dividend, Board of Commissioners Structure


This study intends to research the impact of the board of commissioners structure along with the control variables of return on assets, debt level, firm size, firm growth, and the existence of other priority stackholders on family firm’s dividend policy in Indonesia’s non-financial sector. The research uses panel regression of 116 IDX non-financial listed family firm over the period 2017-2020. In order to explore the effects of board independence, family board, board size, board meeting frequency, and audit committee size on family firms’s dividend policy in non-financial sector in Indonesia. According to the study's findings, for the years 2017 to 2020, the dividend policy of family firm in Indonesia operating in non-financial sectors will be positively and significantly impacted by board independence, board presence from family, the board size, board meeting frequency, and audit committee size.


[1] Abbas, A., Hashmi, S. H., & Chishti, A. F. (2017). Dividend Policy and Capital Structure: Testing Endogeneity. SSRN Electronic Journal, March.
[2] Buachoom, W. (2018). How Do Board Structures of Thai Firms Influence on Different Quantile Levels of Firm Performance? In Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance, 6, 157–189.
[3] Duygun, M., Guney, Y., & Moin, A. (2018). Dividend policy of Indonesian listed firms: The role of families and the state. Economic Modelling, 75(July), 336–354.
[4] Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Analisis multivariat dan ekonometrika: teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan eview 10 (Edisi 2). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
[5] Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. The Economic Journal, 82(326), 770.
[6] Hendrawaty, E. (2020). Examining The Excess Cash Holdings As An Indicator of Agency Problems. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 4(2), 71–80.
[7] Hendrawaty, E., Hasnawati, S., & Purnamasari, L. (2021). Do Independent Commissioners Control the Effect of Family-Owned Business Characteristics on Dividend Policy? A Study in Indonesian Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 2(2), 55–62.
[8] Kilincarslan, E. (2021). The Influence of Board Independence on Dividend Policy in Controlling Agency Problems in Family Firms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(June), 552–582.
[9] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
[10] Rajput, M., & Jhunjhunwala, S. (2019). Corporate governance and payout policy : evidence from India. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 19(5), 1117–1132.
[11] Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137–151.
[12] Setia-Atmaja, L., Tanewski, G. A., & Skully, M. (2009). The role of dividends, debt and board structure in the governance of family controlled firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36(7–8), 863–898.