Analysis Level of Digital Literacy of Digital Natives: How The Impact On Their Self-Regulated Learning?
This study aims to analyze the level of digital literacy of millennial generation and how it affects their abilities in their learning process (self-regulated learning). Data were obtained through an online questionnaire distributed to students at several universities in Yogyakarta. The number of questionnaires that can be processed is 100 questionnaires. Furthermore, the collected data is then analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results showed that the level of digital literacy of female students could be said to be higher than that of male students. However, both male and female students have not so high scores on the dimensions of critical understanding as one dimension of digital literacy. The results of this study also show that digital literacy has a positive effect on self-regulated learning.
Bol, L., & Garner, J. K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Buckingham, D. (2009). Digital Media Literacies : rethinking. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43
Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 34(February), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
Edvard, O., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Computers & Education Students ’ ICT self-e ffi cacy and computer and information literacy : Determinants and relationships, 118(November 2017), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011
Goulão, M. de F., & Fombona, J. (2012). Digital Literacy and Adults Learners’ Perception: The Case of a Second Chance to University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.121
Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers and Education, 76, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008
Knutsson, O., Blåsjö, M., Hållsten, S., & Karlström, P. (2012). Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.002
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture and Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use : A study of China and the UK, 48, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
Markauskaite, L. (2005). Exploring differences in trainee teachers ’ ICT literacy : Does gender matter ?, 445–455.
Markless, S., & Streatfield, D. (2007). Three decades of information literacy : redefining the parameters. Change and Challenge: Information Literacy for the 21stCentury, 17. Retrieved from http://informat.org/pdfs/Streatfield-Markless.pdf
Meelissen, M. R. M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes : Does the school matter ?, 24, 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.001
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nijlen, V., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., Devlieger, I., Aesaert, K., & Braak, J. Van. (2015). Computers & Education The contribution of pupil , classroom and school level characteristics to primary school pupils ’ ICT competences : A performance-based approach, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.014
Park, S. (2012). Sora Park, (142), 87–100.
Perera, M. U. (n.d.). Analyzing the Relationships between Digital Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning of Undergraduates – A Preliminary Investigation LEARNING via Personal Learning Environments what they need , rarely. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1169&context=isd2014
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Rahmah, A. (2015). Digital Literacy Learning System for Indonesian Citizen. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.109
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2013). Albert D . Ritzhaupt, 45(4), 291–307.
Selcuk, H. (2019). Digital Literacy, Creativity, and Autonomous Learning, (April), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0
Skills, I. (2011). Media & Society Internet Skills and the Digital Divide, (December 2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
Soysal, F., Çallı, B. A., & Coşkun, E. (2019). Intra and Intergenerational Digital Divide through ICT Literacy , Information Acquisition Skills , and Internet Utilization Purposes : An Analysis of Gen Z, 8(1), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM81-37
Toering, T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jonker, L., van Heuvelen, M. J. G., & Visscher, C. (2012). Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS). International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2012.645132
Willem, C., Aiello, M., & Bartolome, A. (2006). Blended Learning and New Literacies: An Experience at the University of Barcelona (Spain), 2003-2005. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 2(8), 107–114. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/868017132?accountid=14540%0Ahttp://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk:4550/resserv?genre=article&issn=18323669&title=International+Journal+of+Technology%2C+Knowledge+and+Society&volume=2&issue=8
Zhang, H., & Zhu, C. (2016). A Study of Digital Media Literacy of the 5th and 6th Grade Primary Students in Beijing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0285-2
Zimmerman, B. (1990). Zimmerman (1).Pdf. Educational Psychologist.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Zimmerman, B. J. (2018). C H A P T E R 39 Development and Adaptation of Expertise : The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ekspektra : Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekspektra : Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemenis licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.