Freedom of Opinion of Judges in Dissenting Opinion in a Criminal Verdict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v9i2.10227Keywords:
Dissenting Opinion, Judge, Comparative LawAbstract
Dissenting opinion refers to the views expressed by one or more members of the panel of judges who disagree with the majority's decision. In Indonesia, although a dissenting opinion is the view of a minority of judges, it does not change the decision that has been agreed upon in the deliberations of the panel of judges, either for now or in the future. The main purpose of dissenting opinions in Indonesia is to accommodate the freedom of judges to express legal opinions that differ from the majority. Unlike the United States, where dissenting opinions can become the basis for jurisprudence and be referenced in similar cases, the legal impact of dissenting opinions in Indonesia is more limited. In the United States, dissenting opinions of judges can immediately become part of the development of the applicable law, in line with social changes and community needs. In contrast, changing the law through dissenting opinions in Indonesia requires a long process through the legislative institutions. Although there are differences in the application of the concept of dissenting opinion between the two countries, they both strive to maintain judicial transparency and accountability. In the United States, judges' dissenting opinions can shape the law without going through the legislative process, while in Indonesia, while not changing the verdict, dissenting opinions still reflect judges' independence and transparency in decision-making. This comparison shows differences in legal approaches, but both aim to ensure legal certainty and accountability to the public.
References
BOOK
Cruz, Peter De, Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Coomon Law, Civil Law dan Socialist Law (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010).
Mahdi, Imam, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Teras, 2011).
Mahfud, Moh Md, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, 1st ed (Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES, 1998).
Wojowasito, S & WJS Porwadarminta, Kamus Lengkap Inggris Indonesia, dan Indonesia Inggris (Bandung: Penerbit Hasta, 2001).
JOURNAL
Abidah, Tsuwaibah et al, “Comparison of the Civil Law System between the Netherlands and Indonesia in the Application of Criminal Law” (2025) 1:1 J Verum Legis Indones 38–44, online: <https://journal.abhinaya.co.id/index.php/jvli/article/view/41>.
Ali, Ashgar, Ali Mohamed Ahmad & Ibrahim Kulliyyah, “Dissenting Opinion: the Voice of the Future” (2016) 4:4 Malayan Law J Artic MLJ lxiii Malayan Law J Artic 495–517.
Amato, Anthony D, “Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper” (1978) 468:10 Yale Law J.
Ashalirrohman, Yusron, “Deontology and Equality in Corruption Law Enforcement” (2025) 1:1 Iuris Philos J 1–10, online: <https://jurnal.jurisprudenceinsights.com/index.php/Iurisphilosophiajournal>.
Ayu WP, Zendy Wulan & Haidar Adam, “Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang” (2014) 29:2 Yuridika 168–190.
Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, Putri Anjelina Nataly Panjaitan & Rizky Kurniyanto Widyasasmito, “Peran Dissenting Opinion Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional” (2020) 20:1 J Penelit Huk Jure 1.
Minarno, Nur Basuki, “Authorities of Preparation and Hospitality of Applications for Post-Conditions Post-Decision of Constitutional Court” (2019) 35:1 Yuridika 75.
NG, Marshal, “Dissenting Opinion Dalam Hukum Indonesia” (2018) 30:39 Varia Huk.
Ramadhan, Muh Zafri, “Failure of Criminal Sanctions in Law Enforcement Environmental Crime in Indonesia” (2025) 1:1 J Verum Legis Indones 28–37, online: <https://journal.abhinaya.co.id/index.php/jvli/article/view/31>.
Register, Virginia Law, “Dissenting Opinions. Their Purpose and Results Author ( s): Walter Stager Source : The Virginia Law Register, Nov 1925, New Series, Vol. 11, No. 7 ( Nov, 1925 ), Published by : Virginia Law Review Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable/110 (1925) 11:7 395–399.
Salman, Radian, Sukardi Sukardi & Mohammad Syaiful Aris, “Judicial Activism or Self-Restraint : Some Insight Into the Indonesian Constitutional Court” (2018) 33:1 Yuridika 145.
Singh, Yogesh Pratap, Afroz Alam & Akash Chandra Jauhari, “Dissenting opinions of judges in the supreme court” (2016) 51:5 Econ Polit Wkly 13–16.
Snelgrove, Huon, Nick Gosling & Greg McAnulty, “The dissenting opinion: Can simulation-based multi-professional training reduce ‘groupthink’?” (2011) 87:1027 Postgrad Med J 323–324.
Sunarmi, “Dissenting Opinion Sebagai Wujud Transparansi Dalam Putusan Pengadilan” (2007) 12:2 J Equal 3–7.
WEBSITE
Biro Program Informasi International Departemen Luar Negeri AS, “Garis Besar Sistem Hukum Amerika Serikat”, (2010).
