Law Enforcement Against Police Officers Who Commit Illegal Levies in East Kalimantan Regional Police Jurisdiction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v9i3.11174

Keywords:

Corruption, Illegal Levies, Police Accountability

Abstract

This research examines criminal law enforcement mechanisms against police officers who commit illegal levies within the East Kalimantan Regional Police jurisdiction. Using a juridical sociological methodology with a descriptive analytical approach, the study investigates the legal framework governing police misconduct and identifies systemic obstacles impeding effective enforcement. The research reveals that criminal law enforcement operates through a dual-track system combining criminal prosecution under the Criminal Code and Anti-Corruption Law with internal disciplinary proceedings. Two paradigmatic cases demonstrate contrasting prosecution approaches: Officer E's systematic extortion involving multiple victims prosecuted under Articles 368, 423 KUHP, and Article 12(e) of the Anti-Corruption Law, and Officer JB's more ambiguous illegal levy collection requiring nuanced legal interpretation of coercion elements. The study identifies critical obstacles, including inadequate internal oversight mechanisms, a pervasive institutional culture prioritizing corporate solidarity over legal accountability, economic pressures motivating illegal conduct, victim reluctance to report misconduct due to power imbalances and fear of retaliation, and distinctive evidentiary challenges arising from the clandestine nature of illegal levy transactions. The research concludes that effective criminal law enforcement requires comprehensive institutional reforms addressing surveillance capabilities, witness protection mechanisms, organizational culture transformation, and enhanced evidentiary protocols to ensure police accountability and maintain public trust in law enforcement institutions.

References

Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arief, B. N. (2008). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Kencana.

East Kalimantan High Court. (n.d.). Appellate court records (2023-2024).

East Kalimantan High Prosecutor’s Office. (2024). Interview with Prosecutor, “Evidentiary Challenges in Police Misconduct Cases.”

East Kalimantan Legal Aid Foundation. (2024). Interview with Victim Advocacy Coordinator, “Barriers to Police Misconduct Reporting.”

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023a). Annual Report on Professional Standards and Internal Affairs (Internal Document 2023-2024).

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023b). Case documentation from East Kalimantan Regional Police.

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023c). Case documentation from East Kalimantan Regional Police Division of Profession and Security (Propam), Officer JB Investigation File No. 2023/PROPAM/002.

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023d). Case documentation from East Kalimantan Regional Police Division of Profession and Security (Propam).

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023e). Performance Metrics and Resource Allocation Report (Internal Document).

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2023f). Witness Protection Assessment Report (Internal Document).

East Kalimantan Regional Police. (2024). Interview with Police Welfare Officer “Economic Pressures and Compensation Issues.”

East Kalimantan Regional Police Digital Forensics Unit. (2024). Electronic Evidence in Corruption Cases Analysis (Technical Report).

East Kalimantan Regional Police Internal Affairs Division. (2024). Internal Report-Case Resolution Analysis 2020-2024.

East Kalimantan Regional Police Legal Division. (2023). Prosecutorial memorandum.

East Kalimantan Regional Police Propam. (2024). Interview with Division Head, “Internal Oversight Challenges.”

East Kalimantan Regional Police Propam Division. (2024a). Comparative case analysis.

East Kalimantan Regional Police Propam Division. (2024b). Interview with Senior Investigator.

East Kalimantan Regional Police Propam Operations. (n.d.). Surveillance evidence, Case File No. 2023/PROPAM/001.

Indonesian Supreme Court. (2023). Guidelines for Evidence Evaluation in Corruption Cases.

Interview with Anonymous Source. (2024). Informal Economic Systems in Police Organizations.

Interview with Civil Society Representative. (2024). Institutional Responses to Police Misconduct Complaints.

Interview with Former Police Officer (Anonymous). (2024). Institutional Culture and Misconduct Reporting.

Irianto, B. R., & Rini, F. (2014). Studi Lembaga Penegak Hukum. Justice Publisher.

Litiloly, H. A. H., & Supusepa, R. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Praktik Pungutan Liar (Pungli) Dalam Penerbitan Kendaraan Bermotor. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, 4(1), 49–56.

Rahardjo, S. (2011). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

State Court of Samarinda. (2023). District Court Decision No. 125/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Smr.

Surakhmad, W. (1999). Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah: Dasar Metode dan Teknik. Tarsito.

Suyono, Y. U. (2014). Hukum Kepolisian: Kedudukan Polri dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Laksbang Grafika.

Taimenas, E. (2018). Analisis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pungutan Liar. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Law Enforcement Against Police Officers Who Commit Illegal Levies in East Kalimantan Regional Police Jurisdiction. (2023). Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v9i3.11174

Issue

Section

Articles