Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage Registration: A Critique of Judicial Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.11580Keywords:
Human Rights, Interfaith Marriage, Religious DiversityAbstract
In 2023, the Supreme Court enacted the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023 on Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases of Marriage Registration Requests between People of Different Religions and Beliefs (SEMA 2/2023). The SEMA 2/2023 prohibits judges from granting applications for the registration of interfaith marriages between individuals of different religions and beliefs. This judicial policy does not cohere with the reality that some religions in Indonesia do not strictly prohibit interfaith marriage. Thus, such judicial policy unjustifiably infringes on the human rights of the citizens. This research is conducted to analyze the inconsistency of the SEMA 2/2023 with the Marriage Law, the reality of religious diversity in Indonesia, and the human rights principle. This research is conducted as normative legal research using the statutory and conceptual approach. The finding of this research is that the SEMA 2/2023 is in line with the Marriage Law, the reality of religious diversity in Indonesia, and the human rights principle. Thus, the judge shall not enforce the SEMA 2/2023.
References
BOOK
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015).
Przybylinski, Stephen, Politico- Philosophical and Normative Traditions of Justice (Bristol University Press, 2023).
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Hukum dan Masyarakat (Bandung: Angkasa, 1986).
Sommers, Tamler, Relative Justice: Cultural Diversity, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility (Princeton University Press, 2012).
Suteki, Hukum dan Masyarakat (Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2021).
Tamanaha, Brian Z, A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
JOURNAL
Bose, SK, “An Insight into the Concept of Constitutionalism: A Safeguard against Arbitrary Power” (2025) 5:3 SSRN 727–735, online: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5318809>.
Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan, “Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila sebagai Dasar Filosofis dan Ideologis Bangsa” (2017) 13 DiH J Ilmu Huk.
Firdaus, Muhammad Ihsan, “Legalization of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia (Between Universalism and Cultural Relativism)” (2023) 1:2 Easta J Law Hum Rights 64–72, online: <https://esj.eastasouth-institute.com/index.php/eslhr/article/view/52>.
Hamdani, Fathul & Ana Fauzia, “Tradisi Merariq dalam Kacamata Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam” (2022) 3:6 J Huk Lex Gen 433–447.
Harahap, Candra Andreansah, Agung Syarifudin & Universitas Batam, “Legal Construction of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesian Pluralism Context: Analysis of Regulation and Practice” (2025) 1:4 Int J Soc Sci Humanit 53–64, online: <https://international.appisi.or.id/index.php/IJSS/article/view/158>.
Istimeisyah, Dian, “Natural Law as a Normative-Ethical Framework for the Protection of Human Rights” (2025) 3:4 Media Huk Indones Publ by Yayasan Daarul Huda Krueng Mane 514–520, online: <https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/index>.
Jaiswal, Maitreyee, “Constitutionalism Through the Lens of Doctrine and Precedents” (2024) 4:1 Indian J Integr Res Law 617–629.
Khoirunnisa & Didi Jubaidi, “Political Configuration of Law in Law Enforcement in Indonesia” (2023) 4:4 Ilomata Int J Soc Sci 560–576.
Kholiq, Achmad, Abdul Aziz & Ahmad Yani, “RECONSTRUCTION INTERFAITH MARRIAGE LAW IN INDONESIA: Relevance of Sociology Knowledge and Maqasid Sharia” (2025) 25:1 Al-Risalah 70–86.
Lestari, Julita, “PLURALISME AGAMA DI INDONESIA Tantangan dan Peluang Bagi Keutuhan Bangsa” (2010) 6:1 Wahana Akad J Stud Islam dan Sos 29–38, online: <https://www.neliti.com/publications/337371/pluralisme-agama-di-indonesia-tantangan-dan-peluang-bagi-keutuhan-bangsa>.
Pueyo-Ibáñez, Belén, “Moral Inquiry Beyond Objectivism and Subjectivism” (2021) 35:2 J Specul Philos 165–175.
Purnama, Muhammad Ilham & Septiayu Restu Wulandari, “Legal Review of Interfaith Marriage from a Human Rights Perspective” (2024) 3:4 J-CEKI J Cendekia Ilm 1621–1632.
Putra, Irman & Arief Fahmi Lubis, “Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law in Indonesia: Historical Development and Contemporary Issues” (2023) 1:2 West Sci Law Hum Rights 89–96.
Putri, Nerisma Eka, Khaidir Ali Junid & Muhammad Azkia Fahmi, “Marriage Between Religions Based on Human Rights Perspectives” (2024) 9:1 SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS 372–384.
Sangdel, Djawed & Damla Mesulam, “Abusive Constitutionalism: Comparative Analysis” (2024) 16:2 Geopolit Hist Int Relations 62–81.
Siregar, Wahidah Zein Br & Ella Syafputri Prihatini, “Passing the Sexual Violence Crime Law in Indonesia: Reflection of a Gender‐Sensitive Parliament?” (2024) 12 Polit Gov 1–17.
Suhariyanto, Didik, “Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights from the Authority of the President in Indonesia” (2022) 2:12 Eduvest - J Univers Stud 2684–2690.
Winda Fitri, Shelvi Rusdiana, Windi Regina Anggia Putri, “Legal Issues Of Interfaith Marriages In Indonesia: A Comparative Study” (2024) 14:1 J Huk Media Justitia Nusant 53–70.
WEBSITE
Central Statistics Agency of Samarinda City, “Agama di Indonesia”, (2024).
Congregation Development Materials, “Tata Gereja dan Tata Laksana Gereja Kristen Indonesia”, (2023), online: <https://s.id/bahanbinajemaatgkisoka>.
Diocese of Surabaya, “Kitab Hukum Kanonik”, (1983), online: <https://www.keuskupansurabaya.org/document/kitab-hukum-kanonik-1983/>.
Silvia Estefina Subitmele, Nurrohman Sidiq, “Tak Terhalang Beda Keyakinan, 6 Pasangan Artis Ini Gelar Pernikahan di Luar Negeri”, (2025), online: Liputan6.
Subangkit, Windari, “Beda Agama, 10 Bukti Hangatnya Keluarga Jamal Mirdad dan Lydia Kandou”, (2020), online: Popbela.