Criminalization of Separatism in Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v7i2.11796Keywords:
Criminalization, Criminal Law, Separatism, Terrorism, Legal SystemAbstract
The enactment of Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism marks a significant legislative development in Indonesian criminal law by formally criminalizing separatism through Articles 12A and 12B. Despite this regulatory advancement, the placement of separatism provisions within anti-terrorism legislation raises complex juridical questions regarding conceptual clarity, norm harmonization, and the balance between national security imperatives and constitutional human rights guarantees. This study examines two central issues: first, the regulatory framework governing the criminalization of separatism under Law No. 5 of 2018; and second, the juridical implications of such criminalization for the Indonesian criminal law system. Employing a normative juridical research method, this study applies three complementary approaches — statutory, conceptual, and historical — to analyze the relevant legal materials. The theoretical framework draws upon Sudarto's criminalization theory to evaluate the philosophical, sociological, and juridical justifications underlying Articles 12A and 12B, and Friedman's legal system theory to assess the broader systemic implications across the dimensions of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The findings indicate that the criminalization of separatism substantially satisfies the requirements of Sudarto's theory, yet notable weaknesses persist in terms of definitional precision and inter-norm harmonization. The juridical implications encompass institutional specialization within the law enforcement structure, conceptual hybridization of terrorism and separatism within the criminal law substance, and a cultural shift in balancing security protection with human rights within the criminal justice system. This study concludes that regulatory refinement through clearer conceptual elaboration and strengthened institutional capacity is essential to optimize the implementation of separatism criminalization within a democratic and just Indonesian criminal law framework.
References
Akbar, M. F. (2023). The urgency of law reforms on economic crimes in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2175487
Benard, S., Tembo, M., Msiska, U., Nsoma, P., & Chadza, M. (2023). Non-Industrial Sugarcane Value Chain Analysis in Zombwe Extension Planning Area, Mzimba North, Malawi. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 2971–2981. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3036
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Galingging, R. (2023). Legal and Political Implications of Designating the Free Papua Movement as a Terrorist Organization. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 4(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v4i3.452
Hasibuan, H., & Tijow, L. M. (2024). The Government’s Role in Enforcing the Law Against Perpetrators of Terrorism. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e3145. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3146
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711
Lianingsih, N., Irman, D., & Nurnisaa, N. (2025). The Impact of the Digital Economy on Employment and Workforce Structure in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 6(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v6i1.889
Ojo, J. S. (2024). Transforming Pacifists into Warmongers? Separatist Movement, State Repression, and the Politics of Framing Terrorism in Nigeria: Evidence from IPOB and Yoruba Nation’s Freedom Frontiers. Journal of Applied Security Research, 19(3), 377–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2023.2189867
Rahmadi, A., Karjoko, L., & Hartiwiningsih, H. (2025). The Price of Corruption on State Losses Policy. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 479–502. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14813
Riduan, I. M. (2024). Unraveling Legitimacy: A Critical Examination of Anti-Terror Legislation in Indonesia. Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 14(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v14i1.2580
Yunanto, S., & Damayanti, A. (2024). The politics of labeling TNPPB-OPM as terrorist: Explanation, process, and implications. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 10(1), 75–92. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20578911241231998
Zipursky, B. C. (2025). The Long Arc of Legality: Hobbes, Kelsen, Hart David Dyzenhaus. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 38(1), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.12