Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law in Modern Governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.12203

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Administrative Law, Modern Governance, Algorithmic Accountability, Rule of Law

Abstract

This research examines the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision-making (ADM) on administrative law and modern governance. As governments increasingly integrate AI into public services—from welfare distribution and tax administration to law enforcement—foundational principles of administrative law, including legality, transparency, and accountability, face unprecedented challenges. The objective of this study is to analyze how existing legal doctrines adapt to the "black-box" nature of AI and to evaluate emerging global regulatory frameworks. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical methodology rooted in a comprehensive literature review of international legal scholarship and landmark case law, the study identifies a growing tension between administrative efficiency and the protection of fundamental rights. The findings suggest that while AI enhances productivity by reducing "noise" in human judgment, it risks entrenching systemic biases and eroding procedural fairness. The results highlight the necessity of "communicative accountability" and "prospective benchmarking" to maintain the rule of law. The study concludes that modern governance requires a transition from traditional human-centric oversight to integrated socio-technical regulatory models, exemplified by the EU AI Act and the lessons learned from the failures of systems like SyRI in the Netherlands and Robodebt in Australia.

References

Ameen, K. S., Towfiq, T. A., Mousa, K. M., & Pooyanmehr, M. (2026). Judicial review of algorithmic administrative systems legality evidence and remedies in the smart city state. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1802986

Appelman, N., Fathaigh, R. Ó., & Hoboken, J. van. (2021). Social Welfare, Risk Profiling and Fundamental Rights: The Case of SyRI in the Netherlands. JIPTEC, 12, 257–271.

Bantekas, I., & Bratsiakou, V. (2025). Automated Decision-Making Systems and Black Box Challenges Under European Union Administrative Law. Fordham International Law Journal, 49(1), 1–47. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2918&context=ilj

Chowdhury, S. (2024). Technology is never neutral: Robodebt and a human rights analysis of automated decision-making on welfare recipients. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 30(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2024.2409620

Editorial Board. (2025). Resetting Antidiscrimination Law in the Age of AI. Harvard Law Review, 138(6), 1562–1584. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/resetting-antidiscrimination-law-in-the-age-of-ai/

Engstrom, D. F., & Ho, D. E. (2020). Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State. Yale Journal on Regulation. https://reglab.stanford.edu/publications/algorithmic-accountability-in-the-administrative-state/

European Commission. (2024). AI Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai

Fan, Y. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in the digital transformation of government: opportunities and ethical challenges. Front Public Health, 4(13). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1694996

Fatmawati, E. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Governance, Ethics, and Decision-Making. VISIONER, 17(2), 37–48. https://ejournal.goacademica.com/index.php/jv/article/download/1420/872/

Hannah, A., & Botterill, L. C. (2025). Avoiding the brakes: Malign policy and legal advice in the Robodebt scandal. Policy and Society, 44(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf018

Huggins, A. (2025). Regulating Automated Government Decision-Making: An Australian Perspective - Combatting the Code book forum. https://www.auspublaw.org/blog/2025/11/regulating-automated-government-decision-making-an-australian-perspective-combatting-the-code-book-forum

IAPP. (2021). Digital welfare fraud detection and the Dutch SyRI judgment. https://iapp.org/news/a/digital-welfare-fraud-detection-and-the-dutch-syri-judgment

Jenkins, M. (2021). Algorithms in public administration: How do we ensure they serve the common good, not abuses of power? The use of algorithmic decision-making is growing faster than you might think. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/blog/algorithms-artificial-intelligence-public-administration-transparency-accountability

Kastanas, I., & Pavlidis, G. (2025). Algorithmic Administration and the EU AI Act: Legal Principles for Public Sector Use of AI. Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies, 7(2), 59–79.

Lee, J., & Dai, Y. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Data-Driven Technology in the Public Policy Cycle: Comparative Applications, Opportunities, and Risks. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 27(5–6), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2025.2598371

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2025). Artificial Intelligence 2025 Legislation. https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2025-legislation

Obuba, M. O. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Public Sector Leadership: Navigating Challenges and Emerging Opportunities. Open Journal of Leadership, 15(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2026.151009

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Governing with Artificial Intelligence: The State of Play and Way Forward in Core Government Functions. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_795de142-en/full-report/how-artificial-intelligence-is-accelerating-the-digital-government-journey_d9552dc7.html

Panagopoulou, F. (2024). Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22259/2642-8318.0601001

Schneider, G. (2019). The Algorithmic Governance of Administrative Decision-Making: Towards an Integrated European Framework for Public Accountability. EUROJUS, 1, 134–148. https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/197823

Sheehy, B., & Ng, Y.-F. (2024). The Challenges of AI Decision-Making in Government and Administrative Law: A Proposal for Regulatory Design. Indiana Law Review, 57, 664–699.

Tomlinson, J., & McGurk, B. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law: The UK’s Search for a New Framework. Yale Journal on Regulation. https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/artificial-intelligence-and-administrative-law-the-uks-search-for-a-new-framework-by-joe-tomlinson-brendan-mcgurk/

UNESCO. (2022). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: The Recommendation. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

United Nations. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI). https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/artificial-intelligence

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. (2024). AI and human rights: the new international Framework Convention. https://vu.nl/en/research/ai-and-human-rights-the-new-international-framework-convention

Zhu, X. (2026). Public administration with, of, and through AI: toward a new paradigm in the era of intelligence. Journal of Chinese Governance, 11(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2025.2578589

Downloads

Published

2026-05-24

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law in Modern Governance. (2026). Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(2), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.12203

Issue

Section

Research Collaboration