Strategi Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa: Sebuah Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/smj.v14i2.11593Abstract
Abstract
Students’ low mathematical communication skills pose a challenge in 21st-century mathematics education. This study aims to explore applicable methods for improving students’ mathematical communication skills in mathematics education through a systematic literature review (SLR). The study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved using Publish or Perish and Google Scholar with the keyword “mathematical communication skills,” yielding 654 articles. The articles were then screened based on inclusion criteria, resulting in 93 final articles for analysis. Data were analyzed using thematic synthesis to categorize the methods or approaches for improving students' mathematical communication skills. The results of the study indicate that there are five categories for improving students’ mathematical communication skills: constructivist models, cooperative learning, problem-based approaches, technology-based learning, and metacognitive or scaffolding. The dominant criterion used was constructivist models, with 35 articles. In particular, the models most commonly used are CTL and RME. This study recommends that mathematics teachers integrate one of the five criteria into their instructional design. Furthermore, future research could conduct qualitative explorations involving broader and more in-depth studies to uncover how students’ mathematical communication skills improve, as well as develop a wider variety of assessment tools beyond written tests..
Keywords: Learning Mathematics, Mathematical Communication skills, Systematic Literature Review
Abstrak
Rendahnya kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menjadi tantangan dalam pembelajaran matematika abad ke-21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi cara yang dapat diaplikasikan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika melalui metode systematic literature review (SLR). Penelitian dilakukan berdasarkan prosesedur PRISMA, pencarian data menggunakan bantuan publish or perish dan Google Cendikia dengan kata kunci kemampuan komunikasi matematis yang dihasilkan sebanyak 654 artikel. Kdemudian artikel diseleksi berdasarkan kriteria inklusi hingga diperoleh 93 artikel final untuk dianalisis. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik thematic synthesis untuk mengkategorikan metode atau cara meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang didapatkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 5 kategori untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa, yaitu constuctivist models, cooperative learning, problem based approaches, technology based learning, dan metacognitive atau scaffolding. Kriteria yang dominan digunakan constuctivist models yaitu sebanyak 35 artikel. Sedangkan, model-model secara spesifik yang bayak digunakan adalah CTL dan RME. Penelitian ini menyarankan agar guru matematika mengintegrasikan salah satu dari lima kriteria ke dalam desain pembelajaran. Selain itu, untuk penelitian selanjutnya dapat melakukan eksplorasi kualitatif yang melibatkan penelitian secara global dan lebih mendalam untuk mengungkap bagaimana proses peningkatan komunikasi matematis siswa, serta pengembangan instrumen asesmen yang lebih variatif di luar tes tulis.
Kata Kunci: Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis, Pembelajaran Matematika, Systematic Literature Review
Downloads
References
[1] D. Mahrunnisya, “Keterampilan Pembelajar Di Abad Ke-21,” JUPENJI J. Pendidik. Jompa Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.jomparnd.com/index.php/jupenji/article/view/598
[2] M. Muhali, “Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 25, 2019, doi: 10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126.
[3] M. R. Masdul, “Komunikasi Pembelajaran,” Iqra J. Ilmu Kependidikan dan Keislam., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 3, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.56338/iqra.v13i2.259.
[4] T. Siregar, “Enhancing Students ’ Mathematical Collaboration and Communication Skills through Discovery Learning,” Eur. J. STEM Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18283282.
[5] D. R. Thompson and M. F. Chappell, “Communication and representation as elements in mathematical literacy,” Read. Writ. Q., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 179–196, 2007, doi: 10.1080/10573560601158495.
[6] B. Thornhill-Miller et al., “Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
[7] N. Noperta, A. Armiati, D. Permana, and Y. Yerizon, “The Validity of realistic mathematics education based mathematics learning materials for vocational high school students,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1554, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012008.
[8] N. F. Siregar, “Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” Logaritma J. Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidik. dan Sains, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 74–84, 2018, doi: 10.24952/logaritma.v6i02.1275.
[9] M. Genç and R. Özdemir, “Teachers ’ Thoughts on the Role of Mathematical Communication in Special Education,” Technol. Innov. Spec. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2023.
[10] N. Rohid, Suryaman, and R. D. Rusmawati, “Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills (MCS) in Solving Mathematics Problems: A Case in Indonesian Context,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 19–30, 2019, doi: 10.29333/aje.2019.423a.
[11] OECD, PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing, 2021. doi: 10.1787/9789264190511-en.
[12] R. Rifai and Y. S. Kusumah, “Increasing Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability Through Web-Based Learning,” J. Anal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 81–90, 2022, doi: 10.15575/ja.v8i2.19989.
[13] A. Astuti and Leonard, “Peran Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa,” J. Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 2012, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v2i2.91.
[14] D. T. Lestari, E. E. Rohaeti, and E. Senjayawati, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis,” J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 440–444, 2019, doi: 10.31004/joe.v1i2.85.
[15] A. Hidayatuloh and T. S. Sumartini, “Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa smp pada materi segiempat,” J. Authentic Res. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 203–2014, 2023, doi: 10.37058/jarme.v3i1.2340.
[16] L. Amatul Wahid and Rina Marlina, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Pada Materi Relasi Dan Fungsi,” Didact. Math., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 138–147, 2022, doi: 10.31949/dm.v4i1.2004.
[17] L. Linda and E. A. Afriansyah, “Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Self-efficacy pada Materi Segiempat dan Segitiga di Desa Sirnajaya,” J. Math. Sci. Comput. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 20, 2022, doi: 10.20527/jmscedu.v2i1.5127.
[18] R. Nasri and E. Z. Jamaan, “Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (Lkpd) Berbasis Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Sma,” JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Mat. dan Sains), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 140–148, 2022, doi: 10.25273/jems.v10i1.12051.
[19] N. S. Putri, D. Juandi, and A. Jupri, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Talk-Write terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa: Studi Meta-Analisis,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 771–785, 2022, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1264.
[20] W. D. Indriani and L. H. Pasaribu, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 291–299, 2022, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1196.
[21] Hidayati, Z. Abidin, and B. I. Ansari, “Improving students’ mathematical communication skills and learning interest through problem based learning model,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1460, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012047.
[22] H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, no. March, pp. 333–339, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
[23] K. Khan, R. Kunz, J. Kleijnen, and G. Antes, “RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Five steps to conducting a systematic review,” J. R. Soc. Med., vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 118–121, 2003, doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118.
[24] A. S. Lathifah, K. Hardaningtyas, Z. A. Pratama, and I. Moewardi, “Penerapan Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v3i1.2233.
[25] S. Negi, “Constructivist approach of Vygotsky for innovative trends in learning and teaching,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 349–353, 2020, doi: 10.33545/27068919.2020.v2.i1f.662.
[26] M. J. Kieffer, “Development of Reading and Mathematics Skills in Early Adolescence: Do K-8 Public Schools Make a Difference?,” J. Res. Educ. Eff., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 361–379, 2013, doi: 10.1080/19345747.2013.822954.
[27] R. Shafira, E. Suanto, and K. Kartini, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Berorientasi Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 401–410, 2021, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.416.
[28] R. Febriana, “Application of the RME Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Concepts Understanding,” Tarbawi J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 118–125, 2021, doi: 10.32939/tarbawi.v17i2.1006.
[29] S. Green and M. Gredler, “A Review and Analysis of Constructivism for School-Based Practice,” School Psych. Rev., vol. 31, pp. 53–70, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086142.
[30] E. Talkhan, S. Alhubaidah, A. Muthanna, and S. Qadhi, “Social Sciences & Humanities Open The effect of cooperative learning toward mathematics achievement of primary students : A systematic review using meta-analysis,” vol. 12, no. November, 2025.
[31] Salamun et al., Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, I. Lampung: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2023.
[32] E. Zakaria, L. C. Chin, and M. Y. Daud, “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics,” J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 272–27, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.272.275.
[33] J. B. Arbo and D. A. Ching, “Problem-Based Learning Approach in Developing Mathematical Skills,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–47, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.53378/352873.
[34] M. Shirley, K. Irving, V. Sanalan, S. Pape, and D. Owens, “The practicality of implementing connected classroom technology in secondary mathematics and science classrooms,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 9, pp. 459–481, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9251-2.
[35] L.-D. Fredy, B. Oscar, and V. Ana, “Pedagogical mediation with ICT for the development of critical thinking in primary education : A systematic review,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 60, no. November 2025, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102085.
[36] S. Gartmann and M. Freiberg, “Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving: Helping Students to Ask The Right Questions,” Math. Educ., vol. 6, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.63301/tme.v6i1.1785.
[37] M. Anggreni, Anwar, and S. Munzir, “Pedagogical scaffolding strategies for supporting students with mathematical learning difficulties in special education,” J. Elem., vol. 11, no. July, pp. 648–668, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i3.29996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath by http://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/mipa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Â
