Systematic Literature Review: Application of Probing Prompting Learning Model to Improve Students' Numeracy Skill
Abstract views: 200
,
4596 publish downloads: 138
Abstract
Numerical skills are important for students to have because numeracy skills are closely applied in everyday life. This article was written with the aim of finding out whether students' numeracy skills can be improved by applying the probing prompting learning model, how are the numeracy skill indicators, and how numeracy skills indicators can be integrated with probing prompting learning. The method used is the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by reviewing 18 articles of accredited national journals on Sinta 2 to Sinta 5 and international journals indexed by Scopus with the keywords applying the probing prompting model and numeracy skills. The results showed that the implementation of the probing prompting learning model in mathematics learning could improve students' numeracy skills, and indicators of numeracy skills could be integrated in probing prompting learning.
Downloads
References
Kemdikbud, “Desain Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum,” in Desain Pengembangan AKM, 2020, pp. 1–125.
D. J. Purpura, A. R. Napoli, and Y. King, “Development of Mathematical Language in Preschool and Its Role in Learning Numeracy Skills,” in Cognitive Foundations for Improving Mathematical Learning, 1st ed., vol. 5, Elsevier Inc., 2019, pp. 175–193. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815952-1.00007-4.
T. Tasyanti, Wardono, and Rochmad, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation,” in PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2018, pp. 334–346.
S. Hadi and Novaliyosi, “TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi, 2019, pp. 562–569.
D. Harefa et al., “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Script untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika,” JKPM (Jurnal Kaji. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 13, 2020, doi: 10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.6602.
N. H. zain; I. C. S. R. Eryani, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Open Ended terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Tematik Lisenia,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1683–1688, 2021.
D. N. Marceillina, I. Wiryokusumo, and D. A. Walujo, “The Use of Probing Prompting Learning (PPL) and Inside Outside Circle (IOC) Model to Learning Outcome of Plane Figure Material,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. Learn., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2019, doi: 10.20448/2003.51.9.14.
E. Istiana, “Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Probing-Prompting dan Knisley Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa,” UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 2020.
R. Amalia et al., “How Is the Students’ Concept Mastery in Terms of Gender Differences? the Effectiveness of
Probing Prompting Learning Model,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012020.
E. Triandini, S. Jayanatha, A. Indrawan, G. Werla Putra, and B. Iswara, “Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia,” Indones. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 63, 2019.
H. Ulya and R. Rahayu, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Probing-Prompting Berbasis Etnomatematika Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematika,” Teknodika, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 53, 2018, doi: 10.20961/teknodika.v16i2.34779.
S. Hartinah et al., “Probing-prompting based on ethnomathematics learning model: The effect on mathematical communication skills,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 799–814, 2019, doi: 10.17478/jegys.574275.
S. Nelwati and Y. Yeni, “Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik yang Diajar dengan Metode Probing-Prompting Learning Pada Kelas Vii Mtsn Bungus Teluk Kabung Padang Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018,” Math Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019, doi: 10.15548/mej.v3i1.268.
A. S. Sadiah, E. Komala, and R. Sugiarni, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting,” Pi Math. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 69–73, 2019, doi: 10.21067/pmej.v2i2.3367.
D. A. O. Setiawati, I. G. P. Sudiarta, and I. M. Ardana, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Berbantuan Index Card Match Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sukasada,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Mat. Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jppm.v8i1.2845.
F. Lestari, R. Marta, and V. Indah, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 247–255, 2020, doi: 10.31004/jote.v2i1.1225.
S. Nuraeni and A. B. Kusuma, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa Melalui Ctl Dengan Teknik Probing-Prompting Smp Negeri 1 Kembaran,” J. SILOGISME Kaji. Ilmu Mat. dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 44, 2020, doi: 10.24269/silogisme.v5i1.1920.
J. A. Sahensolar and N. Susilowaty, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Model Pembelajaran Accelerated Learning Cycle (ALC) Dan Probing Prompting,” J. Padegogik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/jpd/article/view/2368
E. S. Praja, S. Setiyani, N. Aminah, M. Mudrika, and L. Sagita, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Eksplorasi Matematika dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa,” Fakt. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–59, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v8i1.8604
I. U. Machromah, N. S. Utami, R. Setyaningsih, D. Mardhiyana, and L. W. S. Fatmawati, “Minimum competency assessment: Designing tasks to support students’ numeracy,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 3268–3277, 2021.
D. Ambarwati and M. D. Kurniasih, “Pengaruh Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Media Youtube Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2857–2868, 2021, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.829.
M. R. Baharuddin, S. Sukmawati, and ..., “Deskripsi Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Operasi Pecahan,” Pedagog. J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 90–101, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.my.id/pedagogy/article/view/1607%0Ahttps://e-journal.my.id/pedagogy/article/download/1607/1258
R. Kamsurya and M. Masnia, “Desain Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Menggunakan Konteks Permainan Tradisional Dengklaq Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 67–73, 2021, doi: 10.36312/jime.v7i4.2368.
D. R. Sari, E. N. Lukman, and M. R. W. Muharram, “Soal Geometri Pada Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum-Numerasi Sekolah Dasar,” Fondatia J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 153–162, 2021.
Suriyani and M. S. Wahyuni, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penalaran Matematis Untuk Menstimulasi Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Dengan Konteks ‘Rumahku,’” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 26–29, 2021.
E. R. Widiastuti and M. D. Kurniasih, “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Software Cabri 3D V2 terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1687–1699, 2021.
S. Winarni, A. Kumalasari, M. Marlina, and R. Rohati, “Efektivitas Video Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Dan Digital Siswa,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 574, 2021, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3345.
D. Ate and Y. K. Lede, “Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Numerasi,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 472–483, 2022, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1041.
R. Widyastuti, Suherman, B. S. Anggoro, H. S. Negara, M. D. Yuliani, and T. N. Utami, “Understanding Mathematical Concept: The Effect of Savi Learning Model with Probing-Prompting Techniques Viewed from Self-Concept,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1467, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012060.
W. Jannah, Ellizar, I. Dewata, and Rahadian, “The Correlation Of A Scientific Approach Using The Probing Prompting Technique And A Problem-Based Learning Model On Learning Outcomes On Reaction Rate Material,” Int. J. Progress. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 151–165, 2021.
S. W. Han and F. Borgonovi, “Students’ teaching career expectations by gender and ability levels in science and math: The role of salary and numeracy skills,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 405–427, 2020, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12407.
D. W. Ekowati, Y. P. Astuti, I. W. P. Utami, I. Mukhlishina, and B. I. Suwandayani, “Literasi Numerasi di SD Muhammadiyah,” ELSE (Elementary Sch. Educ. Journal) J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Sekol. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2019, doi: 10.30651/else.v3i1.2541.
A. D. Cahyanovianty and Wahidin, “Analisis Kemampan Numerasi Peserta Didik Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1439–1448, 2021.
N. Anggrieni and R. I. Putri, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelompok Kecil Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe PISA,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, 2018, pp. 472–481.
S. Maryama, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing-Prompting Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 27 Palembang,” UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, 2020.
