Legal Analysis of the Validity of Certificates of Ownership (SHM) with Legal Defects (Case Study of Decision Number: 252/PK/PDT/2024)

Yani Maryadi; Bachrul Amiq; Tamsil

doi:10.25139/lex.v8i1.9327

Yani Maryadi Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Bachrul Amiq Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Tamsil Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v8i1.9327

Abstract views: 91 ,

PDF downloads: 40

Keywords: Certificates of Ownership, Legal Defects, Legal Analysis

Abstract

In the field, there are many cases that show that Land Rights Certificates can be sued through the Court, one of which is as in case Number: 252 PK/PDT/2024. This study examines the Ratio Decidendi of Judges in deciding cases against the validity of Legally Defective Certificates of Ownership (SHM), and examines the legal consequences of the validity of Legally Defective Certificates of Ownership (SHM), as in Decision Number: 252 PK/PDT/2024. This research uses normative research methods, with statutory and case approaches. The results showed that the Ratio Decidendi of the Panel of Judges in the Examination of Judicial Review Case Number 252 PK/PDT/2024 was correct and correct. According to the researcher, the reasons of the Petitioner for Judicial Review cannot be justified, and the Decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Judicial Review is appropriate. The legal effect of the Supreme Court Decision on Judicial Review Case Number 252 PK/PDT/2024 is that the Certificate of Ownership which is the object of the dispute is declared legally defective, so that it does not have binding legal force.

References

Book
Amiruddin & H Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006).
Effendie, Bachtiar, Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia dan Peraturan-Perturan Pelaksaanya (Bandung: Alumni, 1993).
Parlindungan, A P, Bunga Rampai Hukum Agraria serta Landreform Bagian II (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009).
Rasjidi, Lili, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012).
Suarda, I Gede Widhiana, Hukum Pidana (Materi Penghapus, Peringan, dan Pemberat Pidana) (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2011).
Sutedi, Adrian, Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011).

Journal
Fauzia, Ana, Deva Gama Rizky Octavia & Fathul Hamdani, “The Conflict of the Norms in the Execution of Secured Objects Which are Enforced by Liability Rights When the Debtor is Bankrupt” (2022) 4:1 Progress Law Rev 1–9.
Febriyanto, Mohammad Dwi & Wahyu Prawesthi, “Sengketa Hak Milik Tanah Sawah Akibat Kegiatan Jual Beli yang Tidak Sah” (2024) 10:4 J Ilm Wahana Pendidik 461–473.
Gayatri, Ni Made Silvia, I Putu Gede Seputra & Luh Putu Suryani, “Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Akibat Cacat Administrasi” (2021) 3:1 J Analog Huk 79–83.
Hamdani, Fathul et al, “Constitutional Analysis of the Need for the Tribal Peoples Bill: Initiatives to Establish a Fair Customary Court” in Pros Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masy Huk Adat di Tingkat Nas dan Int (Recognition, Respect, Prot Const Rights Indig Peoples a Natl Int Perspect (Jakarta: Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Adat (APHA), 2023) 191.
Ismail, Ilyas, “Sertipikat sebagai Alat Bukti Hak Atas Tanah dalam Proses Peradilan” (2011) 13:1 J Ilmu Huk 23–34.
Moertiono, R Juli, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Akibat Penguasaan Tanah Tanpa Hak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1319 K/Pdt/2011)” (2020) 2:1 J Ilm METADATA 1–21.
Nurcahyo, Dedy Dian & Nainuri Suhadi, “Kajian Hukum terhadap Pernerbitan Sertifikat yang Diterbitkan Tanpa Dihadiri oleh Saksi Batas” (2017) 5:1 Yuriska J Ilm.
Sartika, Maya, “Kedudukan Putusan Pengadilan yang Sudah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap dalam Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah” (2019) 2:1 J Sos Hum 71–78.