Analisis Kebijakan Dana Desa dalam Merespon Masalah Kemiskinan di Indonesia

  • Ajie Hanif Muzaqi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kadiri
  • Djoko Susanto Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kadiri
  • M. Daimul Abror Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kadiri
  • Tri Ambulanto Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kadiri
Abstract views: 382 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 452
Keywords: IDM, Proverty, Village Fund

Abstract

This study purposes to describe the evaluation of village fund program policies in answering the problem of poverty in Indonesia between 2017-2021. To obtain data in evaluating this policy, it is obtained from holistic data consisting of the number of poor people and the Building Village Index (IDM). Meanwhile, data analysis was carried out using a descriptive method by dividing into 6 (six) large regions in Indonesia, namely Sumatra, Java & Bali, Maluku & Nusa Tenggara, Sulawesi, Kalimantan, and Papua. The results showed that for five years the village fund has increased drastically. This condition also coincides with the decline in the poverty rate of around 15% from 2017 to 2021 in Indonesia. Meanwhile, IDM status by province also shows an increase from what was originally a disadvantaged village in 2017 to a developing village in 2021. The Java & Bali region is the region that contributes the most in improving the status of IDM, be it a developing, developed or independent village. Meanwhile, Papua is the largest area in the context of underdeveloped villages in Indonesia.

References

Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Tinjauan atas pelaksanaan keuangan desa dalam mendukung kebijakan dana desa. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 6(1), 61–76.

Adhayanto, O., Arianto, B., Winatawira, W., Suryadi, S., & Nurhasanah, N. (2019). The evaluation of the utilization of the 2018 village funds in Bintan district and Lingga district. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 11(2), 125–136.

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183.

Arham, M. A., & Hatu, R. (2020). Does village fund transfer address the issue of inequality and poverty? A lesson from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(10), 433–442.

Arifin, B., Wicaksono, E., Tenrini, R. H., Wardhana, I. W., Setiawan, H., Damayanty, S. A., Solikin, A., Suhendra, M., Saputra, A. H., & Ariutama, G. A. (2020). Village fund, village-owned-enterprises, and employment: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 382–394.

Azwar, W., Hasanuddin, H., Muliono, M., Permatasari, Y., Amri, M. U., & Yurisman, Y. (2020). The Models of Nagari Indigenous Governments in West Sumatra. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 12(1), 33–42.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Persentase Penduduk Miskin (P0) Menurut Provinsi dan Daerah 2020-2021. In Bps.Go.Id. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/23/192/1/persentase-penduduk-miskin-p0-menurut-provinsi-dan-daerah.html

Bergstrom, K., & Dodds, W. (2021). The targeting benefit of conditional cash transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 194, 104330.

Chakrabarti, S., Peña, I., & Garrett, J. (2018). Developing nutrition-sensitive value chains in Indonesia.

Endah, K. (2018). PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN DESA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 5(1), 76–82.

Fatoni, A. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 12(1), 103–112.

Fatonie, I. (2020). The role of Indonesian Think Tanks as policy entrepreneurs in policy development of village governance. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–17.

Halseth, G., & Ryser, L. (2012). A primer for understanding issues around rural poverty. Community Development Institute at UNBC.

Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2018). Universal basic incomes versus targeted transfers: Anti-poverty programs in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 201–226.

Hardianti, S. (2017). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan infrastruktur desa (program alokasi dana desa di Desa Buntongi Kecamatan Ampana Kota). Katalogis, 5(1).

Kementerian Desa Republik Indonesia. (2020). Tentang Indeks Desa Membangun. https://idm.kemendesa.go.id/view/detil/1/tentang-idm

Kurniawan, K. (2021). Evaluasi dampak dana desa terhadap pembangunan infrastruktur desa di indonesia. FORUM EKONOMI, 23(3), 513–522.

Kushandajani, K. (2017). Implikasi UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 53–64.

Mahadiansar, M., Ikhsan, K., Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., & Aspariyana, A. (2020). Paradigma pengembangan model pembangunan nasional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 17(1), 77–92.

Mahriadi, N., Agustang, A., Idhan, A. M., & Rifdan, R. (2021). KORUPSI DANA DESA PROBLEMATIKA OTONOMI DESA DALAM UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA. Publik: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Administrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 324–336.

Muluk, M. R. K., Pratama, M. R., & Muzaqi, A. H. (2021). The Landscape of Inclusive Public Service Innovation in Indonesian Local Government. 3rd Annual International Conference on Public and Business Administration (AICoBPA 2020), 474–479.

Muzaqi, A. H., & Tyasotyaningarum, B. (2022). Village Community Empowerment Model in Smart Village Perspective (Study on Village Communities in Jombang Regency). JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik), 10(1), 42–53.

Nadeak, H., Dalla, A. Y., Nuryadin, D., & Hadi, A. S. (2015). Batas Wilayah Desa Pasca Berlakunya Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 7(3), 239–250.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. In Language teaching research (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 129–132). Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.

Paellorisky, M. O., & Solikin, A. (2019). Village Fund Reform: A Proposal for More Equitable Allocation Formula. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 11(1), 1–13.

Prain, G., Wheatley, C., Odsey, C., Verzola, L., Bertuso, A., Roa, J., & Naziri, D. (2020). development partnerships for scaling complex innovation: Lessons from the Farmer Business School in IFAD-supported loan-grant collaborations in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 182, 102834.

Prastyanti, S., & Subejo, M. (2018). POVERTY: A NEVER ENDING HOMEWORK IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT.

Purwanto, S. A., Sumartono, S., & Makmur, M. (2013). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dalam Memutus Rantai Kemiskinan (Kajian di Kecamatan Mojosari Kabupaten Mojokerto). Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies, 16(2), 79–96.

Stamboel, K. A. (2013). Panggilan Keberpihakan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Suharto, D. G. (2012). Penyelenggaraan pemerintahan Desa dalam perspektif desentralisasi administratif dan desentralisasi politik. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 4(3), 153–160.

Susilowati, N., Herdiani, A., & Widhiastuti, R. (2018). Village Community Participation Model in Village Funds Management to Exteriorize the Accountability. KnE Social Sciences, 1024–1038.

Watts, J. D., Tacconi, L., Irawan, S., & Wijaya, A. H. (2019). Village transfers for the environment: Lessons from community-based development programs and the village fund.

Wibisono, N. (2017). Mengungkap fenomena pengawasan publik terhadap dana desa di Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal AKSI (Akuntansi Dan Sistem Informasi), 2(2).

Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
Hanif Muzaqi, A., Susanto, D., Abror, M. D., & Ambulanto, T. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Dana Desa dalam Merespon Masalah Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Publik Dan Kebijakan Sosial, 6(2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.25139/jmnegara.v6i2.4847