Review Aspects and Tools for Formal Review of Legislation under the Law by the Supreme Court


Abstract
This study examines the aspects of judicial review and its touchstone in the formal evaluation of regulations below the law by the Supreme Court, which has not been explicitly regulated. The judicial review of rules below the law is governed by Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2011, which focuses solely on Material Review. This study employs a legal-normative method utilizing conceptual, statutory, historical, and comparative approaches. Theoretically, a formal review includes aspects of power and the procedure for regulation-forming. However, in the current Indonesian legal system, only the procedural aspect is regulated, while the power aspect remains unclear. Ideally, the regulation of the power-aspect review should be incorporated into the Supreme Court Law. Regarding touch-stone, Article 24A of the 1945 Constitution, Article 9 (2) of Law No. 12 of 2011, and Article 26 of Law No. 48 of 2009 designate laws as the touch-stone, whereas the Supreme Court Law and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2011 use higher-level regulations as the touch-stone. Ideally, only laws should be used as touchstones by the hierarchy of norms. The principles in Articles 5 and 6 of Law No. 12 of 2011 can also serve as the basis for reviewing power and procedural formation, offering greater flexibility and development through case law.
References
Andrea, S J Fockema, Rechtsgeleerd Handwoordenboek (Groningen/Batavia: J.B. Wolter, 1948).
Assidiqie, Jimmly & M Ali Safaat, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006).
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna, Hukum Acara dan Wacana Citizen Lawsuit di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019).
Garner, Bryan A, Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed (USA: Thomson West Publishing Co., 2004).
Hamdani, Fathul et al, Meaningful Participation dalam Pengesahan Perjanjian Internasional: Perspektif Pembentukan Perundang-undangan (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2025).
Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine der Normen (Wien: Manz, 1979).
Mahkamah Agung, Himpunan Putusan Hak Uji Materiel Mahkamah Agung RI (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2002).
Manan, Bagir, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi (Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2012).
Munaf, Yusri, Hukum Administrasi Negara (Pekanbaru: Marpoyan Tujuh, 2016).
Slapper, Gary & David Kelly, The English Legal System, 6th ed (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2003).
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-undangan Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007).
Wahid, Abdul, Fathul Hamdani & Ana Fauzia, Pengujian Undang-Undang: Mengurai Konsep Judicial Review & Judicial Preview (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2024).
JOURNAL
Arwanto & Wike Anggraini, “Good Governance, International Organization and Policy Transfer: A Case of Indonesian Bureaucratic Reform Policy” (2022) 26:1 J Kebijak dan Adm Publik 33–46, online:
Asmara, Galang et al, “Konsep Penguatan Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD NRI Tahun 1945” (2019) 4:2 J Kompil Huk 193–205, online:
Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede & Bagus Hermanto, “Paradigma Keilmuan dalam Menyoal Eksistensi Peraturan Kebijakan dan Peraturan perundang-undangan: Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Agung” (2019) 16:4 J Legis Indones 435–449.
Fudin, Hanif, “Aktualisasi Checks and Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2022) 19:1 J Konstitusi 202–224, online:
Hanafi, Muhammad F & Sunny U Firdaus, “Implementasi Teori Hans Nawiasky dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia” (2022) 1:1 J Demokr dan Ketahanan Nas 79–83.
Idris, Tarwin, “Status Hukum Pemberlakuan Peraturan Pelaksana Undang-Undang Setelah di Batalkannya Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2020) 3:5 J Lex Renaiss 607–625.
Irfani, Nurfaqih, “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum” (2020) 16:3 J Legis Indones 305–325.
Madril, Oce & Jery Hasinanda, “Perkembangan Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) dalam Pengujian Administratif di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Uji Materi di Mahkamah Agung” (2021) 51:4 J Huk Pembang 952–970, online:
Meidiana, “Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2019) 2:2 Undang J Huk 381–408, online:
Nurfransiska, Ferika et al, “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Ketentuan Metode Penghitungan 30 Persen Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Pencalonan Anggota Legislatif oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 24 P/HUM/2023)” (2024) 3:2 J Lawnesia 579–589.
Piotrowski, Ryszard, “Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the Limits of Popular Sovereignty: Rethinking the Polish Experience” (2019) 79 Stud Iurid 78–91, online:
Prianto, Wahyu, “Analisis Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Teori Norma Hukum oleh Hans Kelsen dan Hans Nawiasky” (2024) 2:1 J Ilm Ilmu Sos dan Pendidik 8–19, online:
Purwaningtyas, Lovika Augusta, Bayu Dwi Anggono & A’an Efendi, “Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang” (2023) 4:1 Interdiscip J Law, Soc Sci Humanit, online:
Ridwan, “Eksistensi dan Urgensi Peraturan Menteri dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Sistem Presidensial” (2021) 18:4 J Konstitusi 828–845, online:
Setyaning, Khofifah, “Kewenangan Uji Materi Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2023) 2:3 Souvereignty J Demokr dan Ketahanan Nas 299–303, online:
Syah, alwiyah Sakti Ramdhon, “Simplifikasi terhadap Peraturan-Peraturan Pelaksanaan yang Dibentuk oleh Presiden dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia” (2021) 10:2 J RechtsVinding 249–262, online:
Voermans, WJM, “Delegatie van regelgevende bevoegdheid: de Aanwijzingen voorbij” (2001) 2 Regelmaat 65–73, online:
Zabavs’ka, Khrystyna & Yaryna Zavada, “The checks and balances system – the evolution of public governance in a historical and theoretical context” (2023) 24:1 J Echa Przesz 107–119, online:
Zeldi, L M R et al., “Application of theory and regulation of hierarchy legal regulations in the problem of forest area status” (2019) 343 IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1–6, online:
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti, M. Galang Asmara, Khairul Umam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.