Consumer Protection against the Inclusion of Standard Clauses Containing Exconeration Clauses in Parking Agreements

Siti Khidratul Jalilah; Djumardin; Hirsanuddin

doi:10.25139/lex journal.v9i2.10092

Siti Khidratul Jalilah Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, University of Mataram, Indonesia
Djumardin Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, University of Mataram, Indonesia
Hirsanuddin Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, University of Mataram, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex%20journal.v9i2.10092

Abstract views: 21 ,

PDF downloads: 15

Keywords: Consumer Protection, Standard Clauses, Parking Agreement

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal consequences of the inclusion of standard clauses containing exoneration clauses in agreements based on the Civil Code, analyze consumer protection against the inclusion of standard clauses containing exoneration clauses in parking agreements based on the GCPL and analyze the responsibility of parking managers for the loss of consumer vehicles in the parking area based on the GCPL. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research using a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal consequences of including standard clauses containing exoneration clauses in agreements based on the Civil Code are null and void. In consumer protection against the inclusion of standard clauses containing exoneration clauses in parking agreements, there are two types of legal protection efforts: preventive and repressive. Preventive legal efforts in the scope of consumer protection against the inclusion of standard clauses containing exoneration clauses in parking agreements are Article 18, paragraph (1), letter (a), prohibiting business actors from including standard clauses in every agreement and document that states the transfer of responsibility. While repressive legal remedies aim to resolve problems that arise, consumers can claim compensation and choose to resolve disputes through or out of court. Regarding the responsibility of parking managers for the loss of consumer vehicles in the parking area, it is regulated in Article 19, paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.

References

BOOK
Amiruddin & H Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006).
Burhanuddin, S, Pemikiran Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dan Sertifikasi Halal (Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2011).
Herlina, Rita, Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata (Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI, 2017).
Kurniawan, Faizal, Perkembangan Hukum Perikatan: Doktrin Unjustifeffied Enrichment sebagai Dasar Tuntutan Ganti Rugi untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Berperikatan (Malang: Cita Intrans Selaras, 2017).
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
Shidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia (Jakarta: Grasindo, 2006).
Sidabolok, J, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006).
Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika, 2011).
Subekti, R, Hukum Perjanjian (Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 2005).
Tobing, Rudyanti Dorotea, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Sebuah Bunga Rampai (Yogyakarta: LaksBng Justitia, 2021).

JOURNAL
Abbas, Ririn Yulandari, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pengelola Parkir Atas Kehilangan dan Kerusakan Kendaraan Bermotor Persfektif Perlindungan Konsumen” (2024) 5:2 J Lex Theory 850–860, online: .
Fauzia, Ana, Fathul Hamdani & Deva Gama Rizky Octavia, “The Revitalization of the Indonesian Legal System in the Order of Realizing the Ideal State Law” (2021) 3:1 Progress Law Rev 12–25.
Hadiyono, Venatius, “Indonesia dalam Menjawab Konsep Negara Welfare State dan Tantangannya” (2020) 1:1 J Hukum, Polit dan Kekuasaan 23–33, online: .
Muthmainnah, Alifiah & Abd Rais Asmar, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen dalam Perjanjian Parkir yang Mengandung Klausula Eksonerasi” (2023) 5:3 Alauddin Law Deveplopment J 561–570, online: .
Purnawati, Putri Citra, Achmad Busro & R Suharto, “Kajian Hukum terhadap Klausula Baku dalam Perjanjian Jasa Parkir PT Cipta Sumina Indah Satresna dengan Konsumen di Samarinda (Studi Kasus Putusan MA No 2157 K/PDT/2010)” (2017) 6:2 Diponegoro Law J 1–14, online: .
Purnomo, Singgih et al, “Klausula Baku dalam Persfektif Perjanjian Dagang” (2021) 5:4 J Ilmu Sos dan Pendidik 1105–1112, online: .
Sumitro, Silvia Sari, Ronny Adrie Maramis & Herlyanty Y A Bawole, “Tanggung Jawab Pengelola Parkir terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan Konsumen di Area Parkir Berdasarkan Undang-Undangn Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen” (2024) 13:1 Lex Priv 1–14, online: .
Syafitri, Isdiana, “Analisis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen atas Produk Skincare Ilegal Universitas Amir Hamzah Medan” (2022) 5:2 J Insitusi Politek Ganesha Medan Juripol.

WEBSITE
Detik News, “MA Juga Pernah Vonis Pengelola Parkir Ganti Honda Tiger yang Hilang”, (2012), online: .
Tim Hukum Online, “Perlindungan Hukum: Pengertian, Unsur, dan Contohnya”, (2023), online: .