Binding Force of Judgment of State Administrative Court Decisions against Government Agencies

Christopher Hartono; Andrew Wijaya

doi:10.25139/lex journal.v9i2.10228

Christopher Hartono Faculty of Law, University of Narotama, Indonesia
Andrew Wijaya Faculty of Law, University of Narotama, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex%20journal.v9i2.10228

Abstract views: 2 ,

PDF downloads: 0

Keywords: State Administrative Court, Binding Force, Inkracht, Government Agencies, Legal Effects

Abstract

Court decisions in the State Administration (PTUN) essentially have binding legal force on the parties, including government agencies as defendants. This research examines how the binding legal force of PTUN decisions applies to government agencies and the legal consequences that arise if the decision is not implemented. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and case studies of several PTUN decisions that were not executed. The results showed that PTUN decisions with permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) have a final nature and must be implemented by government agencies as a form of respect for the rule of law and the principles of the rule of law. However, in practice, there is still a lot of non-compliance from the government to the contents of the decision, which creates legal uncertainty for justice seekers. Such non-compliance not only undermines the principle of due process of law, but can also lead to administrative and criminal legal consequences for authorized officials. Therefore, more effective monitoring mechanisms and sanction instruments are needed to ensure consistent and equitable implementation of PTUN decisions.

References

BOOK

Asshiddiqie, J, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2010).

Basah, S, Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia (Bandung: Alumni, 1997).

Dani, U, Konsep Sanksi dalam RUU-AP: Suatu Upaya Penguatan Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN (Palembang: Pengadilan TUN Palembang, 2018).

Hadjon, P M, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia (Surabaya: Peradaban, 2007).

Hadjon, Philipus M, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987).

Harahap, Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008).

Harahap, Z, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2001).

HR, Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011).

Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1993).

Manan, Bagir, Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah (Yogyakarta: PSH Fakultas Hukum UII, 2002).

Marbun, S F, Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2011).

Marpaung, A, Eksekusi Putusan PTUN dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi (Medan: Fakultas Hukum USU, 2010).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Mengenal Hukum (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006).

———, Penemuan Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2009).

Prodjohamidjojo, M, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2005).

Soekanto, Soerjono, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011).

Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian (Intermasa, 2001).

Supandi, Kepatuhan Pejabat dalam Menaati Putusan PTUN Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2005) [unpublished].

Tanya, B L & others, Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010).

JOURNAL

Afifudin, M, “Eksekusi terhadap Putusan Pengadilan TUN yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap” (2018) 5:2 J Mimb Keadilan 87–102.

Gusman, D, “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Upaya Paksa Putusan Pengadilan TUN” (2010) 39:3 Masal Huk 225–234.

Ladju, K & others, “Sanksi Terhadap Pejabat yang Tidak Menjalankan Putusan PTUN” (2018) 25:2 J Huk Ius Quia Iustum 321–340.

Lubis, M, “Tantangan Eksekusi Putusan PTUN” (2019) 5:2 J Huk Peratun 134–145.

Ramadhani, Kyagus, I Gede Widhiana & Fiska Maulidian Nugroho, “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Pajak (Studi Putusan No. 3839/Pid. Sus/2020/PN Mdn)” (2022) 12:1 J Anti Korupsi 21–37.

Rumadan, I, “Dilema Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN dalam Praktek” (2010) 2:1 J Huk Progresif 91–105.

Tumpa, H A, “Memahami Eksistensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom)” (2010) 2:1 J Huk dan Peradil 45–60.

Usman, L, “Penjatuhan Sanksi terhadap Pejabat Pemerintahan yang Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Peratun” (2021) 9:2 J Huk Progresif 99–110.

Wahyudi, H Yodi Martono, “Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia” (2007) 5 Hukum 1–11.