Analysis of the Principle of Justice in Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-XXI/2023 on Campaigning in Educational Places and Government Facilities

Zaini Suryono; Bachrul Amiq; Tamsil

doi:10.25139/lex journal.v8i2.9477

Zaini Suryono Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Bachrul Amiq Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Tamsil Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.25139/lex%20journal.v8i2.9477

Abstract views: 87 ,

PDF downloads: 65

Keywords: Principle of Justice, Constitutional Court Decision, Campaign, Place of Education

Abstract

As stated in Ruling Number 65/PUU-XXI/2023, the Constitutional Court's legal ratio for permitting campaigns in government buildings and educational institutions is to be examined in this study, together with the legal implications of the quo Constitutional Court ruling. This study employs a normative technique incorporating case, conceptual, and legislative approaches. According to the research findings, the Constitutional Court's decision to permit campaigns in government buildings and educational settings was made to ensure that the rules in Law No. 7 of 2017—specifically, Article 280 paragraph (1) letter h—do not conflict with the provisions in the Explanatory Chapter. In addition, the Court thinks that permitting campaigns in government buildings and educational institutions will promote political understanding, particularly among students. The legal analysis of the Constitutional Court ruling and associated election regulations reveals the necessity for more specific legal requirements to effectively govern campaign processes and concepts, such as Article 280 paragraph (1) letter h. The rules outlined in the explanatory chapter are not always followed by restrictive regulations as specified in the body because the Court should adopt a methodical and forward-looking (futuristic) interpretation.

References

BOOK
Amiruddin & H Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006).
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Hukum Acara Pengajuan Undang-Undang (Jakarta: Sekertariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkama konstitusi RI, 2006).
Fajar, Mukti & Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Normatif dan Empiris (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2015).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014).
Mawardi, Irvan & Moh Nizar, Keadilan Pemilu: Dilema Bakal Pasangan Calon di Pilkada (Yogyakarta: Nusamedia, 2021).
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
Ziruddin, Ahmad, Kholilur Rahman & Mohammad Agus Maulidi, Merawat Negara Hukum (Bogor: Guepedia, 2023).

JOURNAL
Fatayati, Sun, “Relevansi Asas-Asas Pemilu Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Demokratis dan Berintegritas” (2017) 28:1 Tribakti J Pemikir Keislam 147–163.
Gaffar, Janedjri M, “Kedudukan, fungsi dan peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia” (2009) J Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Hamdani, Fathul & Ana Fauzia, “Legal Discourse: The Spirit of Democracy and Human Rights Post Simultaneous Regional Elections 2020 in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era” (2021) 5:1 Lex Sci Law Rev 97–118.
Hanafi, Ridho Imawan, “Pemilihan Langsung Kepala Daerah di Indonesia: Beberapa Catatan Kritis untuk Partai Politik Direct Election for Local Leaders in Indonesia: Some Critical Notes For Political Parties” (2014) 11:2 J Penelit Polit 1–16.
Hermanto, Bagus, Nyoman Mas Aryani & Ni Luh Gede Astariyani, “Penegasan Kedudukan Penjelasan Suatu Undang-Undang: Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2020) 17:3 J Legis Indones 251–268.
Indra, Mexsasai, “Konsepsi Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Cita Hukum Pancasila” (2014) 1:2 J Selat 120–126.
Kafandi, Muhamad Afif, Yogi Prabowo & Achmad Hafizar, “Kajian Kritis Kedudukan Surat Keputusan Bersama Ditinjau Dari Teori Perundang-Undangan (Studi Pada Surat Keputusan Bersama Tentang Pedoman Pembinaan Dan Pengawasan Netralitas Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pennyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Dan Pemiliha” (2023) 3:5 Innov J Soc Sci Res 1423–1435.
Leawoods, Heather, “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher Notes” (2000) 2 Washingt Univ J Law Policy 489.
Mulyono, Galih Puji & Rizal Fatoni, “Demokrasi sebagai wujud nilai-nilai sila keempat Pancasila dalam pemilihan umum daerah di Indonesia” (2019) 7:2 Citizsh J Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 97–107.
Nazmi, Didi, “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 65/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Kampanye di Ranah Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia” (2023) 6:1 UNES Law Rev 53–62.
Prang, Amrizal J, “Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2011) 13:1 Kanun J Ilmu Huk.
Sabrina, Dian Fitri & Muhammad Saad, “Keadilan dalam Pemilu Berdasarkan Sistem Presidential Threshold” (2021) 3:1 Widya Pranata Huk J Kaji dan Penelit Huk 15–37.
Sarbaini, “Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung dan Demokratis Sebagai Bentuk Perwujudan Hak Asasi Politik Masyarakat di Indonesia” (2020) 12:1 Leg J Huk 107–136.
Setiawan, Ari, “Problematika Dukungan Masyarakat pada Calon dalam Tahapan Kampanye Pemilihan Umum” (2022) 2:1 AWASIA J Pemilu dan Demokr 59–68.
Setiawan, Heru, “Mempertimbangkan Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2017) 14:1 Lex Jurnalica.
Solihah, Ratnia, Arry Bainus & Iding Rosyidin, “Pentingnya Pengawasan Partisipatif dalam mengawal pemilihan umum yang demokratis” (2018) 3:1 J Wacana Polit 14–28.