Beyond the Limitation Period: Legal Protection of Freehold Land Titles and the Tug-of-War Between Certainty and Substantive Justice in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i2.12364Kata Kunci:
Legal Protection, Substantive Justice, Legal CertaintyAbstrak
A Freehold Title (Sertifikat Hak Milik) serves as the primary instrument in the land registration system, designed to provide legal certainty and protection for land rights holders. Nevertheless, the legal protection afforded to certificate holders following the expiration of the limitation period—as stipulated in Article 32, paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997—remains a subject of debate. This issue becomes particularly contentious when the legal certainty inherent in the certificate clashes with demands for substantive justice, often arising from alleged legal defects in its issuance. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of Freehold Title holders after the limitation period expires, viewed through the lens of balancing legal certainty and substantive justice within Indonesian agrarian law. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this study utilizes both statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed prescriptively using qualitative techniques. The findings indicate that legal protection for Freehold Title holders post-limitation period cannot be granted absolutely based solely on the possession of the certificate and the passage of the five-year timeframe. Instead, protection must be administered proportionally. This requires a thorough examination of the certificate's issuance legality, the rights holder's good faith, the actual physical possession of the land, and the strict absence of fraud, abuse of authority, or fundamental legal defects. Ultimately, this research proposes a legal protection model grounded in the equilibrium between legal certainty and substantive justice, serving as a framework to protect certificate holders without compromising the imperatives of justice within Indonesian land law.
Referensi
BOOK
Ali, Achmad, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) & Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence) Termasuk Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume I Pemahaman Awal (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010).
Arizona, Yance, Tanah Adat dan Reforma Agraria (Bogor: Sajogyo Institute, 2018).
Hadjon, Philipus M, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987).
Harsono, Boedi, Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan UUPA, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2008).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014).
Putra, Eduard Awang Maha, Peraturan Kebijakan (Beleidsregel) dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru, 2024).
Radbruch, Gustav, Legal Philosophy (England: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009).
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).
Santoso, Urip, Hukum Agraria dan Hak-Hak Atas Tanah (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2008).
Sumardjono, Maria S.W., Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi (Jakarta: Kompas, 2000).
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research) (2014).
Sutedi, Adrian, Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023).
JOURNAL
Agustin, Riska Sri, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik yang Digunakan sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah” (2020) 4:2 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 404–421, daring: <https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/3382>.
Amal, Beni, “Pembaharuan Hukum Tanah Nasional dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik” (2024) 6:2 Crepido 1–16.
Hamdani, Fathul et al., “Persoalan Lingkungan Hidup dalam UU Cipta Kerja dan Arah Perbaikannya Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020” (2022) 3:4 J Indones Berdaya 977–986.
Hastungkara, Atindriya, “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Perbedaan Luas Faktual dengan Surat Ukur Pada Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah” (2017) 1:2 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 177–200, daring: <https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/551>.
Irfan, Muhammad & Nia Kurniati, “Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah dan Eksistensi Lembaga Rechtsverwerking dalam Perspektif PP Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah” (2018) 1:1 Acta Diurnal J Ilmu Huk 15–29.
Islam, Andi Abdi, Syahruddin Nawi & Andi Risma, “Penerapan Pasal 32 Ayat (2) PP Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Mengenai Asas Rechtsverwerking” (2024) 5:2 J Lex Philos, daring: <https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1956?__cf_chl_f_tk=mazLyvabB82lKF2a6mQW12g3iH.xdBycUZ.3bGP6rrs-1782987085-1.0.1.1-y3p2vSXeKUTtb2JXQCOfU7XUrXTKbj2Jg491pd_wU7o>.
Putri, Audrey Adyuta & Elisatris Gultom, “John Rawls’ Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection” (2025) 4:1 Inov J Sos Hum dan Pendidik 289–303.
Suwardi & Arief Dwi Atmoko, “Esensi Peralihan Hak Kepemilikan Melalui Jual Beli atas Tanah Sesuai Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Nomor 5 Tahun 1960” (2020) 4:2 Lex J Kaji Huk dan Keadilan 339–360, daring: <https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/3378>.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Restu Adi Putra, Irham Rahman, Divi Kusumaningrum

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







